antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
He plays for you.- Rijkaard is better suited to drop back defensively against Leonardo and Signorini and support Di Livio.
He plays for you.- Rijkaard is better suited to drop back defensively against Leonardo and Signorini and support Di Livio.
I get the dynamics behind your tactics, but feel that you lack to ability to stretch his defence. Sinister is playing a narrow sitting deep midfield and Maldini able to tuck in too. Having more bodies in same area will only increase the overlap and without someone to stretch and open the defence up, I don't think it'd be effecting in goal scoring despite you being able to enjoy a high possession %.
.......Salas.....Crespo.......
Recoba................Ortega
....Davids....Rijkaard.....
is how your team should look like imo. Kind of a narrow 4-4-2.
- Davids behind Recoba will have a more powerful effect in overloading Sinisters weak spot, his right defence.
- Rijkaard is better suited to drop back defensively against Leonardo and Signorini and support Di Livio.
I would look at keeping Ayala in the other CB role and finding a different one to cover Di Livio.
I would be very worried about the amount of responsibility you are assigning to two players which may not even show up.
But then, the other issue is your outball from the back. Bar Di Livio as a runner on the right, your ability to execute the transition from the back is suspect. That's where Davids on the left would also help. I suspect part of the reason for Ortega central and Recoba so deep was not getting accused of lacking creativity in the middle of the park. The team looks broken in halves, which is a shame when you have a very dynamic box-to-box player stuck on the right to help cover a wingback I rate but doesn't merit that sacrifice. I'll probably get lambasted, but I'm not entirely convinced Rijkaard>Davids in this context. Davids on the left would completely change your side's balance and ability to move up the pitch IMO.
I get the dynamics behind your tactics, but feel that you lack to ability to stretch his defence. Sinister is playing a narrow sitting deep midfield and Maldini able to tuck in too. Having more bodies in same area will only increase the overlap and without someone to stretch and open the defence up, I don't think it'd be effecting in goal scoring despite you being able to enjoy a high possession %.
.......Salas.....Crespo.......
Recoba................Ortega
....Davids....Rijkaard.....
is how your team should look like imo. Kind of a narrow 4-4-2.
- Davids behind Recoba will have a more powerful effect in overloading Sinisters weak spot, his right defence.
- Rijkaard is better suited to drop back defensively against Leonardo and Signorini and support Di Livio.
Maldini looks a bit wasted on the left with only Di Livio as an attacking threat...
@Lord SInister who are your reserves? Think 5-3-2 with Leonardo at LWB, Maldini LCB and an AM instead of Conseicao would've been better personally.
I'm not 100% sure, but didn't he start in a similar role in his first season at Milan and alternated with Ziege? He was moved in a more attacking position in his second season, but from memory thought he was pretty close to that role - would need a bit of selling of courseLeonardo wouldn't have lasted for so long if you could play him there. He never played there for AC Milan and would not have been in the spirit of the draft.
At least I would have snapped him before LS if I could play him there.
I'm not 100% sure, but didn't he start in a similar role in his first season at Milan and alternated with Ziege? He was moved in a more attacking position in his second season, but from memory thought he was pretty close to that role - would need a bit of selling of course
He certainly played in a left midfield role, albeit in a classic 4-4-2 in some games. As I said probably up for interpretation as you don't have a right winger to trouble Maldini so a back three and Maldini as LCB might be the best use of his strengths also free Leonardo in a more attacking role.Ziege did play almost 2/3rd of the games that season, so doubt if Leonardo had played there too much if not at all.
From what I know, Leonardo's AC Milan career was limited in the attacking end of the pitch.
Leonardo was not fit to play LWB at that stage of his career. As I said, had turned very one-paced and slowed down Milan's tempo considerably. I actually have it down as the low point of his career.He certainly played in a left midfield role, albeit in a classic 4-4-2 in some games. As I said probably up for interpretation as you don't have a right winger to trouble Maldini so a back three and Maldini as LCB might be the best use of his strengths also free Leonardo in a more attacking role.
Leonardo was not fit to play LWB at that stage of his career. As I said, had turned very one-paced and slowed down Milan's tempo considerably. I actually have it down as the low point of his career.
Leaving Leonardo aside, it's an interesting discussion in that one of my options was Mihajlovic at LWB. He played LW, LM (occasionally with a back three so technically the same) and LB so with a three at the back should have been fine, but I was expecting that to be brought up as an issue.
Any other team and I would have done it, but with Donadoni involved I felt it had to be Benarrivo there. Not that anyone seemed to care at all.
What a match! Goals galore in this one, with both managers fielding high quality strike forces and seriously dodgy defences. First Taribo West gives away a free kick and gets a yellow for a nasty tackle, probably pissed off at Montella saying that the weird green things on his head were snakes. Leonardo steps up and curls the free kick into the corner, all while maintaining a quite immaculate hairstyle and leaving several female fans, and Roberto Di Matteo, all in a tizz. 1-0 to Sinister City but hardly a comfortable lead, especially when all four of your defenders started their careers at full back.
Soon Sinister's team of pretty boys are up against it, and the Crespo Salas combination pays off, despite it sounding a bit like something I might have ordered from Carluccio's once for a light lunch. After some superb work from the Oranje midfield, Ortega threads through a perfect ball, Salas rounds the keeper and lays it for Crespo to tap in. 1-1. Maldini is not happy with the three other defenders all marking Recoba just because they prefer right back, especially since Recoba has actually barely moved since kick off, since the ball has actually been moving almost constantly all that time. Not his game, apparently.
Still time for more goals before half time, with Signori outpacing West and Ayala with ease and stroking one in, and Crespo replying with a header after Di Livio nearly killed himself with a run the full length of the pitch into the gap at left back created by Maldini filling in for the three right backs.
After the break some of the players look a bit knackered and upset with so many goals, not least Recoba who seems to be doing one of those creepy street statue impressions, until finally the idmanager mingers get a free kick 35 yards out, and wouldn't you know, he only belts it in with his titanium left foot before having to go off 'injured' (couldn't be arsed).
3-2 to the mingers and this time buoyed by Recoba no longer being on the pitch they finally press their considerable midfield advantage, with both Rijkaard and Davids repeatedly bemused at what the feck Aron Winter is doing lined up against them but gradually getting over it and knocking it about for fun. To cap off the scoring, Davids fires in a rocket from 25 yards to make it 4-2 and take the mingers through to the next round, where their strong spine will be a problem for any team, but how do you solve a problem like Recoba?
I'm actually stunned Paolo was picked in R1 to play leftback. As far as quality is concerned he belongs right up there, but there's only 1-2 players in the pool that he could be useful to face and not exactly George Best so you could make do with someone like Favalli.Poor Paolo
I'm actually stunned Paolo was picked in R1 to play leftback. As far as quality is concerned he belongs right up there, but there's only 1-2 players in the pool that he could be useful to face and not exactly George Best so you could make do with someone like Favalli.
Yeah, it's a shame really because the tactical blueprint was spot on for this game and I can see Signori making serious damage.Indeed. Especially this match where you want your best player in the center of things to snuff out the Salas-Crespo combo. That combo is clear from just reading the names and you'd want Paolo in the mix to counter that not left out left sad and alone.
Maldini looks a bit wasted on the left with only Di Livio as an attacking threat...
@Lord SInister who are your reserves? Think 5-3-2 with Leonardo at LWB, Maldini LCB and an AM instead of Conseicao would've been better personally.
While it has no bearing on the result here, you MUST name him.In hindsight, I agree, 4-2-2-2 was better. Probably much better since EAP's post hits the bulls eye.
But I got way too invested in the Recoba role I wanted to portray and built the rest of it around him.
My unnamed AM approved of the formation as well and hence went with it.
Wanted a discussion around Recoba in that role and whether my understanding of the player was correct.
I voted you because the tactics were spot on, but you did indeed make a mess of that backline.I have N'Gotty, and I was seriously messed up this time around.
While it has no bearing on the result here, you MUST name him.
Congratulations @idmanager
I voted you because the tactics were spot on, but you did indeed make a mess of that backline.