see what happens when veron doesnt play,we play our best football

Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>

yet, he was excellent in 99, CL!! i think teams found him and our style out, hence we changed to a 4-5-1!

i agree, his short passing isn't great, still think he can go a very good job, especially in the PL.. but he has to stop having dellusions of grandeur..and just be content, in knowing that he's the worlds best crosser and not a playmaker...</strong><hr></blockquote>

can't disagree too much there...how boring. ;)
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>

4-5-1 suits europe....

who gives a feck what u want to see?</strong><hr></blockquote>

that's not a proven argument. 4-5-1 didn't give us any upperhand in the two games against Leverkusen. 4-5-1 may suit the most difficult games or the away games in Europe. But in home games or in games where we must win I don't think 4-5-1 is the way to go.

And I wonder if 4-5-1 is so good in Europe why no other big club is using it at this moment.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

While their theonly two fit central midfielders fit i expect to see them together.
when their all fit id like the following.
451: Scholes in the hole with 2 of Keane, Veron & Butt in defensive roles.
442: 1 defensive and attackminded midfielder, which would be Scholes + of the the three as well.
It also depends on the opposition. 2 defensive midfielders may be the preferred option which leaves Scholes out

</strong><hr></blockquote>

With his current form, I won't leave Scholes out no matter what formation we play. Even if we play 6-1-3, I will still use Scholes as the only midfielder!
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

that's not a proven argument. 4-5-1 didn't give us any upperhand in the two games against Leverkusen. 4-5-1 may suit the most difficult games or the away games in Europe. But in home games or in games where we must win I don't think 4-5-1 is the way to go.

And I wonder if 4-5-1 is so good in Europe why no other big club is using it at this moment.</strong><hr></blockquote>

we got to the semis with that formation... and we've qualified with ease with the 4-5-1.

Real Madrid, they play with a withdrawn striker... as do most teams in Europe...


how many play 4-4-2? not many that i can think of...
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>
And I wonder if 4-5-1 is so good in Europe why no other big club is using it at this moment.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Do Real Madrid count as a big club because they use it a fair bit?
For example in Rome recently to devestating effect. :cool:
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

Do Real Madrid count as a big club because they use it a fair bit?
</strong><hr></blockquote>

apparently not.. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

Do Real Madrid count as a big club because they use it a fair bit?
For example in Rome recently to devestating effect. :cool: </strong><hr></blockquote>

If Raul and Ronaldo are both fit will they leave one of them out?
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

If Raul and Ronaldo are both fit will they leave one of them out?</strong><hr></blockquote>

they'll leave out morientes.

raul and ronnie are completed different types of forwards.

do you watch football? ;)
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>If Raul and Ronaldo are both fit will they leave one of them out?</strong><hr></blockquote>

I presume so.
Ronaldo was dropped tonight for example, came down with a "sudden illness", afraid of the Barca reception in other words.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>

we got to the semis with that formation... and we've qualified with ease with the 4-5-1.

Real Madrid, they play with a withdrawn striker... as do most teams in Europe...


how many play 4-4-2? not many that i can think of...</strong><hr></blockquote>

First we must get the definition clear. When I said 4-5-1 I mean the decision to play only one natural striker/forward up front, with a midfielder (Scholes) fill the hole. I never object to play with a "withdrawn striker". Actually we have some very successful withdrawn strikers in the past (Cantona, Sheringham, etc.)
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

First we must get the definition clear. When I said 4-5-1 I mean the decision to play only one natural striker/forward up front, with a midfielder (Scholes) fill the hole. I never object to play with a "withdrawn striker". Actually we have some very successful withdrawn strikers in the past (Cantona, Sheringham, etc.)</strong><hr></blockquote>


well thats what the 4-5-1 system allows.

the problem is that we don't have a cantona type player to make it work as well as it should be working...


aimar or ronaldhino would be perfect for that role.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>


well thats what the 4-5-1 system allows.

the problem is that we don't have a cantona type player to make it work as well as it should be working...


aimar or ronaldhino would be perfect for that role.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That should be our first priorty when we go to strengthen our squad next time.

But at present, Scholes is the way to go in midfield in EPL. We just can't scrafice him for Veron, just like Real won't play Zidane as a striker in order to accomodate, say, Mcmanamann ;)
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>just like Real won't play Zidane as a striker in order to accomodate, say, Mcmanamann ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
I cant believe hes still at Real and one their highest paid players, alls he ever does is come on as a sub and run around like a headless chicken.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
I cant believe hes still at Real and one their highest paid players, alls he ever does is come on as a sub and run around like a headless chicken.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Real simply has too much money to spend ;)
 
Honestly, why is there a need for this thread at all.

It's not as if there is not another mountain of threads dealing with this.

I'm trying to contain myself, but I'm trying, no, I cannot.

mazie, you're a cnut!!!!!! :mad:

I bet it's another incarnation of Giggzy anyway. <img src="graemlins/annoyed.gif" border="0" alt="[Annoyed]" />
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Honestly, why is there a need for this thread at all.

It's not as if there is not another mountain of threads dealing with this.

I'm trying to contain myself, but I'm trying, no, I cannot.

mazie, you're a cnut!!!!!! :mad:

I bet it's another incarnation of Giggzy anyway. <img src="graemlins/annoyed.gif" border="0" alt="[Annoyed]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Cool it Weaste, these type of thread will always exists ;)
 
well its like this keep 4-4-2 and play scholes in the middle and play like we did today?

or

play 4-4-1-1 and play scholes in hole let his forum dip[as well as the teams]thus playing like we have in recent weeks,

to be honest i think all or problems have came since we started 4-4-1-1 and buying veron,

scholes has to stay in the middle,epl and in europe,let the team settle in a formation.then we will start to see better performances,swapping and changing formation is no good,we have not been found out,if that was thr case why isnt real madrid found out,they play the same way week in week,and won euro cup over and over,

it all goes down to veron or scholes?

vote now,

i go for scholes
 
Originally posted by mazie:
<strong>it all goes down to veron or scholes?

</strong><hr></blockquote>

FFS, this comparison have been done ages ago and yet you have to bring it up again? <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> :rolleyes:
 
4-4-1-1 or 4-5-1, whatever you want to call it is a 4-4-2! It's not table football when they are all in lines connected to poles and cant move.

When will people understand this? We have played 4-4-1-1 many times before.

Oh ah, Cantona.

People forget this. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by One Remi Moses:
<strong>Veron has been our best player in Europe.

By a country mile.</strong><hr></blockquote>

True but
 
Originally posted by One Remi Moses:
<strong>Veron has been our best player in Europe.

By a country mile.</strong><hr></blockquote>

True but will he maintain those performances against higher quality teams
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>4-4-1-1 or 4-5-1, whatever you want to call it is a 4-4-2! It's not table football when they are all in lines connected to poles and cant move.

When will people understand this? We have played 4-4-1-1 many times before.

Oh ah, Cantona.

People forget this. :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

But we haven't got Eric now. :(

It might work sometimes with Scholes - but he proved where he plays best yesterday.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>

But we haven't got Eric now. :(

It might work sometimes with Scholes - but he proved where he plays best yesterday.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He has proved it a dozen times now, not only yesterday.
Yet someone is so stubborn that even if he proves it 100 times more, they would still think that he is not as good as Veron. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>
Yet someone is so stubborn that even if he proves it 100 times more, they would still think that he is not as good as Veron. :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

They are two totally different types of player. You cannot compare them.
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>4-4-1-1 or 4-5-1, whatever you want to call it is a 4-4-2! It's not table football when they are all in lines connected to poles and cant move.

When will people understand this? We have played 4-4-1-1 many times before.

Oh ah, Cantona.

People forget this. :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

the main difference between the 4-4-1-1 of Cantona's time and now is that the wings don't play out wide anymore.

Ole played out wide against Newcastle and we looked very very strong on the wings. can you imagine if becks kept out? and even giggs kept outside? it'll be smashin IMO.

i have no problem with 4-4-1-1 persay, but i do have problems with our players playing out of position in this new 4-4-1-1.

Least to least i'd like to see the old 4-4-1-1 back in use. in the EPL atleast.
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>

They are two totally different types of player. You cannot compare them.</strong><hr></blockquote>


Why not? Tell me one thing Veron can do while Scholes can't.
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>


Why not? Tell me one thing Veron can do while Scholes can't.</strong><hr></blockquote>

They can both do everything, but are each better than the other at certain things.

Verón is a butterfly, Scholes is a bee. ;)
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>

They can both do everything, but are each better than the other at certain things.

Verón is a butterfly, Scholes is a bee. ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>


So do you want someone in midfield who floats or stings?
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>


So do you want someone in midfield who floats or stings?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Depends who we are playing against.
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>

Depends who we are playing against.</strong><hr></blockquote>

In England you need someone who stings.
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>

Depends who we are playing against.</strong><hr></blockquote>

So in which kind of match should we pick someone who looks beautiful but can't fight rather than someone who can actually hurt opponent?
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>

They can both do everything, but are each better than the other at certain things. </strong><hr></blockquote>

No, Veron can't tackle. Sometimes he put out his feet "pretends" he is going to tackle, but that's not really doing any harm at all.
Veron's passing is less accurate than Scholes, and he need more time on the ball.
Every time Scholes shoot it looks like it will go in. Every time Veron shoot 80% of them fly into row Z.
Veron may have something better than Scholes, though he doesn't want to show it in United.
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

Every time Veron shoot 80% of them fly into row Z.
Veron may have something better than Scholes, though he doesn't want to show it in United.</strong><hr></blockquote>


hmm, i'd love to see the stats on his accuracy.. sure someone can supply them..

he made two amazing passes when he came on for a few mins against New U.

i doubt 80 percent fly into row z.. classic ABU BS.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>


hmm, i'd love to see the stats on his accuracy.. sure someone can supply them..

he made two amazing passes when he came on for a few mins against New U.

i doubt 80 percent ply into row z.. classic ABU BS.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He has made too many risky passes, even he admits it himself.
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

He has made too many risky passes, even he admits it himself.</strong><hr></blockquote>

ok.

now that is a bit different than saying 80 percent fly into row z, isn't it?

can recall keane saying that he's the most skillful player at OT, the stuff he can do is amazing... to call him crap or shite is well outta order.. its not his fault his game doesn't suit the PL.. how many times has it been said that playmakers don't suit the premiership???? even Platini said he would have struggled...


why don't you 'fans' get off his back.


i hate the Blanc haters n'all... for some reason, they think he's been the reason for our decline.. even tho' he was VERY good last year..and same again this season.. they seem to think that we defend deeper due to his lack of pace..even tho' its NOT been the case in the games i've seen... must be them TV pundits and inparticular andy gay with his 'expert' analysis <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>

ok.

now that is a bit different than saying 80 percent fly into row z, isn't it? </strong><hr></blockquote>

When I said that sentence I refer to his shooting, not passing though.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>hmm, i'd love to see the stats on his accuracy.. sure someone can supply them..
BS.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He is nr 1 in Europe for passes completed,
someone posted a link for it roughly a month ago.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>
can recall keane saying that he's the most skillful player at OT, the stuff he can do is amazing... to call him crap or shite is well outta order.. its not his fault his game doesn't suit the PL.. how many times has it been said that playmakers don't suit the premiership???? even Platini said he would have struggled...


why don't you 'fans' get off his back.


i hate the Blanc haters n'all... for some reason, they think he's been the reason for our decline.. even tho' he was VERY good last year..and same again this season.. they seem to think that we defend deeper due to his lack of pace..even tho' its NOT been the case in the games i've seen... must be them TV pundits and inparticular andy gay with his 'expert' analysis <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Think it was Scholes who said that about Veron, not Keane.

Personally I would like Veron to be sold in January because he isn't the type of player we need or can accomodate in our side. I don't blame Veron for this, BTW.

As for Blanc, sorry but no team with aspirations to be the best in the world should be running out with a 37 year old in defence. It sends out totally the wrong message. We used to sell players when they hit a certain age, now we hire them!

And it's Alan Hansen, a world-class defender himself in his day, who has made observations about how Blanc's play is stretching the defence.
 
Originally posted by nickm:
<strong>

And it's Alan Hansen, a world-class defender himself in his day, who has made observations about how Blanc's play is stretching the defence.</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> is this the same Alan Hansen who said United would never win anything with kids?
is this the same Alan Hansen who normally ends up in an arguement with Martin O'Neill (a good judge of a player and a good manager)
is this the same Alan Hansen who was too chicken to move into management?
its easy to criticise from his armchair.
hes probably jealouse because he couldnt play on at the top level till he was 37.