cj_sparky
Full Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 8,919
Has that Celtic defender not kicked the Rangers player?
To be fair isn’t that how tripping works?Has that Celtic defender not kicked the Rangers player?
To be fair isn’t that how tripping works?
I’d say if you’re completely unbiased, you recognise that both sides of the old firm benefit greatly over the rest.Celtic are a team who really benefit from VAR.
I think that’s a foul though. It a trip in all but nameI'm not sure I'd call that a trip, the Rangers' player planted his foot and the Celtic defender in attempting to kick the ball kicked him instead.
I think that’s a foul though. It a trip in all but name
Edit not a foul, the rangers player doesn’t even extend his leg
Scottish Premiership football is the quality of League 1. It’s terrible.Watching the Rangers/Celtic game & I'm surprised by the low quality of both teams.
They’re both in terrible form and there’s huge pressure on both teams/manager. It’s not that surprising that the quality has been poor. The ones later in the season will be better.Anyone else feel the quality is very low in this game? So many unnecessary give aways.
I'm not sure I'd call that a trip, the Rangers' player planted his foot and the Celtic defender in attempting to kick the ball kicked him instead.
The quality on show was horrific.
That guy Dessers is absolutely shocking.
No Carter VickersScandalous decision.
There is no way he’s a footballer. Nothing you can say will ever convince me otherwise.Lammers is another, the guy has 6 goals for his last 5 teams.
Why me? I had money on a Celtic win. I was rooting for you guys.
Huge win for us. Psychologically, monumental, given we were 3 / 4 first team starters.Kyogo is really good isn’t he?
Celtic are a team who really benefit from VAR.
I’d say if you’re completely unbiased, you recognise that both sides of the old firm benefit greatly over the rest.
I’ve said it before but the fact that both sides cry foul over the other benefiting is irony on a different level.
Scandalous decision.
It really wasn't. By letter of the law it was a foul. Your own team benefited from this recently:
Unless you think that was really a penalty to St. Mirren?
Remember Morelos v Dortmund too? Don't you think it's interesting that referees continue to give these decisions? It's almost like it's the law