- Joined
- Jan 15, 2018
- Messages
- 69
Not as good as the previous two games but still put in a solid performance.
Great work rate and lots of attempts at fast progressive passing through the lines. Exactly what you want from him.
Too bad he cant pass and has hardly any ability on the ball.
Fred and He weren't the problem. Our frontline sucked. The attackers were getting the ball so it wasn't a problem of lack of forward aggression
Was going to point out the exact same thing. Perfectly summed up why we should be looking to replace him at some point. It’s great that he works hard and loves the club, but with how technical football is in the modern game, those attributes simply don’t cut it for a club looking to dominate games and compete against the best of the best.There was a moment in the first half which really summed up his flaws. Tried a progressive pass, which got intercepted and rolled straight back to him. Tried the exact same pass again. Intercepted again. Was depressing to watch.
Such a limited player. I really would like to see what people see in this guy
Whilst they cover a lot of the field we shouldn’t be picking a midfield duo to cover for the deficiencies of our £100mil+ CB pairing.McTominay and Fred are shielding the back 4...McFred is critical to our success moving forward with Harry and Lindelof. McTominay is the steel while Fred is dynamo. Defensively, it looks really secure with McTominay and Fred.
Such a limited player. I really would like to see what people see in this guy
I know right... it's as if the problem is actually at the back which we've been ignoring... or a better system than the current 4231 which basically necessitates two good workhorse CDM to cover our defensive frailties and weaknesses in system due to weakness in perhaps coaching?Whilst they cover a lot of the field we shouldn’t be picking a midfield duo to cover for the deficiencies of our £100mil+ CB pairing.
Being sound positionally defensively & being able to pick some form of a pass consistently should be the minimum expectation for a Manchester United midfielder - both do the former adequately & the latter sporadically.
Being more mobile than Matic-Pogba seems to have boosted the pairs reputation well beyond their abilities.
Thought it was a very poor performance to be honest, expect more from him, gave the ball away too often and never felt he offered a platform to build attacks from.
We were actually able to get a hold of the game and mount sustained pressure when he was subbed off. Before that, him and AWB kept ruining every attack. Their presence in the team hurts us so much.And here we go... let the hating begins.
So that's another "big game" vs "top" side where he play and we didn't lose.
After he's out, our defense immediately opened up, which thankfully Chelsea's attacks are off and shit.
We should have signed Partey instead of VDBPut in a shift but his passing was terrible. We needed someone who can take charge on the ball and he isn't that player.
Exactly this, summed him up in a nutshell, he isnt good enough, if he didnt give the ball away so much, he wouldn't need to charge around trying to win it backThere was a moment in the first half which really summed up his flaws. Tried a progressive pass, which got intercepted and rolled straight back to him. Tried the exact same pass again. Intercepted again. Was depressing to watch.
Yeah it's basically this. Part of the reason we looked offensively blunt is because we have two central midfielders who don't even attempt to offer anything going forward. If either of them were able to play the ball quickly through the lines we'd be fine, but neither of them have that ability.We look more solid with Fred and McTominay because we’re getting two players to do the job that one person does for most top teams.
And here we go... let the hating begins.
So that's another "big game" vs "top" side where he play and we didn't lose.
After he's out, our defense immediately opened up, which thankfully Chelsea's attacks are off and shit.
It it part of the reason we looked offensively blunt against, but the smallest part.Yeah it's basically this. Part of the reason we looked offensively blunt is because we have two central midfielders who don't even attempt to offer anything going forward. If either of them were able to play the ball quickly through the lines we'd be fine, but neither of them have that ability.
Still the main issue would be attack rather than midfield.Im really hoping this isn't the template going forward for when we play decent teams, barely gives us a platform to play any decent football if the front players have anything close to an off day.
It it part of the reason we looked offensively blunt against, but the smallest part.
Firstly, you need quality in attack in the first place - we had only Rashford (against 5 Chelsea defenders).
Secondly, it would be nice if fullbacks were joining the attack. Today not only we played two conservative fullbacks, but also they were asked to stay back.
Thirdly, the midfield. It would be nice if McTominay and Fred were better passers, or could carry the ball better but with the way we were set up yesterday, I don't think it would've made much of a difference.
Still the main issue would be attack rather than midfield.