Cliche Guevara
Full Member
That fee is mental.
Annoying how easily they managed to wrap this one up, also annoying how quickly Bayern have replaced Robben and Ribery what with Gnabry and now Sane. Just watch when they replace Lewandowski with Haaland
Such a well run club
He has interviewed Sane straight after his operation last summer therefore he had a strong connection about this transfer.As this Christian Faulk guy seems to get this right, are we treating his other stuff as being more reliable now?
Very good transfer for Bayern Munich and their 9th league title in a row is now 99% sure.
But Manchester City wouldn't miss him.
Very good transfer for Bayern Munich and their 9th league title in a row is now 99% sure.
But Manchester City wouldn't miss him.
Got our money back on a player whose given us 3 seasons, coming off a big injury and with only 12 months on his contract, Not the best deal in the world but not the worst. Shame because the lad is a serious talent.
Annoying how easily they managed to wrap this one up, also annoying how quickly Bayern have replaced Robben and Ribery what with Gnabry and now Sane. Just watch when they replace Lewandowski with Haaland
Such a well run club
Annoying how easily they managed to wrap this one up, also annoying how quickly Bayern have replaced Robben and Ribery what with Gnabry and now Sane. Just watch when they replace Lewandowski with Haaland
Such a well run club
Be interesting to see how he links up with Alphonso Davies on the left. Sane plays very wide which you’d think wouldn’t give Davies much space on the overlap. On the flip side it could be devastating.
I don’t think Pavard will be the RB long-term. You’ll buy someone this window.He might not play on the left. At Schalke he used to play mainly on the right (same for Germany) and Gnabry is stronger on the left. That way Bayern could have, once again, two wingers who can cut in and be a goal threat while Davies/Pavard provide more width. I also feel that Pavard could be a better combination with Sane because he provides defensive cover for him while Gnabry has the work rate/discipline to cover for Davies/help him out defensively (which is sometimes needed with Davies very attacking style).
So Gnabry/Davies and Sane/Pavard seems more balanced to me.
I don’t think Pavard will be the RB long-term. You’ll buy someone this window.
I expect Dest to come in and compete with Parvard. And as someone already mentioned I wouldn’t be surprised to see Sané on the right wing, aka the Robben position with Gnabry being the Ribery on the left wing.I don’t think Pavard will be the RB long-term. You’ll buy someone this window.
He's been superb on RB. We might buy a player like Dest, but Pavard will be the first option nonetheless. RCB spots will be blocked by Süle, Kouassi, and probably Boateng(for another yr).
Likewise. He also profits from Bayern’s asymmetrical back 4 where the LB is pushing forward and the RB is setup more defensively. Sané on the right would therefore also work.To be honest, he has really surprised me. I really thought that he wouldn't be good enough as a RB and would play CB but he has actually developped his technique which isn't that common at that age.
Likewise. He also profits from Bayern’s asymmetrical back 4 where the LB is pushing forward and the RB is setup more defensively. Sané on the right would therefore also work.
He's been superb on RB. We might buy a player like Dest, but Pavard will be the first option nonetheless. RCB spots will be blocked by Süle, Kouassi, and probably Boateng(for another yr).
He's not been superb at all. You see his limitations in almost every game and even his positioning defensively is questionable at times. It's just that there are few wingers in the Bundesliga who can really take advantage of his terrible center of gravity for a RB. The best, most explosive and most agile wingers in the world will tear him apart. Furthermore he limits our attack potential on the right wing a great deal.
Replacing him with the right player is definitely a priority.
We can't have both FBs go gung ho, and expect us to stable at the back. And still, he does contribute quite a bit going forward, despite you claiming otherwise. 4 goals, 5 assists in 32 apps are a good indicator
My entire assessment is based on Pavard in games that matter the most.
which by your definition have not taken place yet. Still you, being an oracle, know of course how he'll fare in those games.
No. I'm simply measuring Pavard's strength and weaknesses against the requirements at the highest level and from his struggles against even slightly agile Bundesliga wingers we can easily extrapolate what he will look like against the best in the world.
You need only look at his center of gravity to realise that it has the potential to be truly awful. Hansi Flick seems to be in agreement by the way or else during the winter break he wouldn't have called out RB as a position that needs to be reinforced.
It's really not rocket science. I for one am simply in favour of solving an apparent problem before it costs us a Champions League title.
We have never been able to cherry pick from Liverpool or Chelsea though, whereas Bayern regularly take players from their strongest rival, that makes it much easier to look like a "well run club".
At the time and before those transfers Dortmund definitely was a rival of Bayern, in every sense. It wasn’t the only factor but it shifted the power balance a lot.I see this claim quite a lot, and I think this is vastly exaggerated. I've just looked at the signings of last decades, and Bayern tends to buy mostly internationally or from lower tier clubs. Not from their actual rivals. The only signings that would fit that description in the past decade would be Mats Hummels (a player they sold back to Dortmund after one contract term), Mario Götze (also sold back after one term) and Lewandowski. So there's one signing that actually lasted at Bayern where I would agree with you that they "took a player from their strongest rival". However, as can be seen every week, for a good reason. Not to hurt Dortmund as much as getting themselves arguably an European top 5 striker.
In addition, Hummels is still performing just fine for Dortmund and Götze, well... one hit wonders do be like that. So, to be frank, I have no clue what you're on about. But looking at the entire transfer volume for Bayern, they get more of their own youths into the first team than "taking players from their strongest rival". And let's be clear on this, "the strongest rivals" for Bayern don't play in the Bundesliga. They play in other leagues and have names like Barcelona, Madrid (either one, tbh), Juventus, Liverpool etc.
Last I heard is that he‘ll be on €17m gross p.a.Are we all going to ignore that Bayern committed to paying Sane 100m pounds over the next 5 years?
That's almost 400k/week.
If he is not completely over his injury issues, this will very quickly turn into a Sanchez like signing.
And that's ignoring the high benchmark they have now set for every future contract negotiation.
Last I heard is that he‘ll be on €17m gross p.a.
that would be £295k per week.