Grealish because he is
1) The best player amongst those mentioned there
2) He would offer us a whole new dimension in attack that we don't have as of yet especially against low block teams. Just imagine camping teams at the edge of their box and Grealish constantly running with the ball in tight space to create an opening,
Bruno having the time of day spraying passes around to pick out runs from the constant movement of the likes of
Cavani, Greenwood and
rashford. And then the sheer entertainment you'd get as a fan watching
Martial and
Grealish interlink and toy with several defence with their close control.
We would just need a capable DM for all these to work and I don't subscribe to this view of us not needing Grealish because his best position is a LW or CAM, that is simply not true. The guy played as an 8 in central midfield for a whole season back when villa were in the championship and was excellent, him being played in those two positions now his simply because he is that good and would be the most effective on the whole for villa as a team to have him closer to the box.
I have no doubt if given a different role in our team he would absolutely excel in it, he is just that good and his biggest asset to us would be his ball carrying ability, which we absolutely need( we have no one as good as him in the team) especially as we keep trying to play from the back, you literally have to foul the guy to get the ball off him.
3) Finally, I just don't want to see him in any other epl team apart from ours if he where to leave villa. Would be a huge mistake if we allowed him join city without competing, the kind we made back in 2011 with the Silva and Aguero transfers.
@Becks00
Edited to create paragraphs. It would also be nice to read your very good posts if in the future you could capitalise names.
Sultan