Bubz27
No I won’t change your tag line
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,020
You really don't think he did anything wrong today?Seeing a lot of people blaming him on Twitter. I don't think he done anything wrong
You really don't think he did anything wrong today?Seeing a lot of people blaming him on Twitter. I don't think he done anything wrong
They're already a legitimately great team but yes Youngs isn't of the standard required. I think England will be grand in the 6 nations the next 2 years with Ireland and France heading into a transition phase. Scotland have regressed so only Wales are a threat currently I reckon.
2 years down the road will be interesting as Ireland have some serious talent coming through but Farrell needs to get a good attack coach and needs to be on the phone to James Lowe as soon as he becomes eligible.
Give me a couple of examples and I'll offer my opinion. Right now sitting here there is nothing jumping out a me.You really don't think he did anything wrong today?
Had that thought as well. NZ weekness fed into England strength whose weaknesses are SA strength whose weaknesses is NZ strength...Funnily enough, I think New Zealand would've beat SA comfortably. But the England match up wasn't the best for the all blacks.
Really!! don't know why I thought you were Indian.Being half English and half South African has never been weirder... Got people sending me messages of congratulations and commiserations
assuming your dropping earls for him?
Give me a couple of examples and I'll offer my opinion. Right now sitting here there is nothing jumping out a me.
The fans booed the 1st try but the passes were all flat.
England were dominated in the scrum, he wasn't just making penalties up.
He gave the english something like a 15 phase advantage on the tryline when it would normally have been pulled up a lot earlier.
I cant think of anything standing out today
Very sad that @JJ12 is such a negative Nigel. It seems the Welsh are devoid of class. Good game well played, South Africa!
oh im agreeing with dropping earls, just checking it was him being dropped and not stockdale.I like Earls but yes Lowe is a better player IMO and more of a threat for scoring tries. Obviously though I wouldn't be getting rid of Earls entirely. But I agree with @christy87 that we need to move on from some of the players. Hell I'm of the opinion that Sexton should call it a day and focus on Leinster for the rest of his career. Not that he isn't good enough but we need to start giving Carberry and Carty the mantle to build from. Also I'd love to see Cooney start getting more minutes over Murray. The important thing now is to build for four years time and be at our best for a World Cup and not 2 years before which has been a massive problem for us.
We desperately need an attack coach because our players are capable of playing a much better style.
This i can agree with. He was perfectly fine todayHe did nothing wrong, he is in general a shit referee but there was nothing wrong in that game.
Called Lawes for not moving away very quickly but let SA have a few times when they took longer to roll away.Give me a couple of examples and I'll offer my opinion. Right now sitting here there is nothing jumping out a me.
The fans booed the 1st try but the passes were all flat.
England were dominated in the scrum, he wasn't just making penalties up.
He gave the english something like a 15 phase advantage on the tryline when it would normally have been pulled up a lot earlier.
I cant think of anything standing out today
Called Lawes for not moving away very quickly but let SA have a few times when they took longer to roll away.
Called Farrell for not releasing after about 2 seconds but let Etzebeth get away with 5 seconds and not releasing.
Blatant cynicism from de Klerk should've been a yellow (on a couple of occasions as well) but he just let them all go, one given as a penalty.
The knock on from Watson was a knock on, but amazing that he gives it after what he'd let SA get away with in the game.
And that pass in the build up to their first try, it looked forward. It may not have been, but I think it definitely needed to be looked at more clearly. My mind goes back to how many times they looked at Cueto's toe in 2007 to how this was just brushed over. It's frustrating.
But that all said, it doesn't take away from SA and how excellently they played.
Sexton is 34, he should step aside now, there is nothing left for him, the records are not within reach. I’d say o Mahoney as well he’s played a lot of rugby and has shown signs of it getting to him, Kearney has to go. I’d say a few of them should look for the money in FranceI like Earls but yes Lowe is a better player IMO and more of a threat for scoring tries. Obviously though I wouldn't be getting rid of Earls entirely. But I agree with @christy87 that we need to move on from some of the players. Hell I'm of the opinion that Sexton should call it a day and focus on Leinster for the rest of his career. Not that he isn't good enough but we need to start giving Carberry and Carty the mantle to build from. Also I'd love to see Cooney start getting more minutes over Murray. The important thing now is to build for four years time and be at our best for a World Cup and not 2 years before which has been a massive problem for us.
We desperately need an attack coach because our players are capable of playing a much better style.
Sexton is 34, he should step aside now, there is nothing left for him, the records are not within reach. I’d say o Mahoney as well he’s played a lot of rugby and has shown signs of it getting to him, Kearney has to go. I’d say a few of them should look for the money in France
The kids who won the grand slam should be moved in and from what I’m hearing the academy’s are bursting with talent.
He just let some have a go for longer than he let others have a go for.You have spent a good chunk of the first half playing the ball on the ground in rucks. He let everyone have a go on the ground.
...
Really!! don't know why I thought you were Indian.
I think a few got some game time during this tournament.Some very exciting players at u20 level who'll hopefully start getting introduced with the provinces and then push on.
He just let some have a go for longer than he let others have a go for.
SA's momentum was built through a combination of their excellence, the injury to Sinckler and the referee giving them the edge in early decisions.
Ahh the penalty not be awarding to itoje after that lineout was def a mistake. That i agree with.Called Lawes for not moving away very quickly but let SA have a few times when they took longer to roll away.
Called Farrell for not releasing after about 2 seconds but let Etzebeth get away with 5 seconds and not releasing.
Blatant cynicism from de Klerk should've been a yellow (on a couple of occasions as well) but he just let them all go, one given as a penalty.
The knock on from Watson was a knock on, but amazing that he gives it after what he'd let SA get away with in the game.
And that pass in the build up to their first try, it looked forward. It may not have been, but I think it definitely needed to be looked at more clearly. My mind goes back to how many times they looked at Cueto's toe in 2007 to how this was just brushed over. It's frustrating.
But that all said, it doesn't take away from SA and how excellently they played.
I think a few got some game time during this tournament.
For the provinces while the team was awayFor Ireland? I don't think any of that recent u20 team have broken through yet.
I definitely haven't been a sore loser. I agree that we didn't get close to breaking the game line.He didn't, don't be a sore loser. England had the longest advantages that Rugby has ever seen and they were allowed to play the ball in rucks for ever. The reality is that you failed to break the advantage line which didn't put you on the front foot all that often. It's frustrating but it had nothing to do with the referee who was fair to both teams, even though he doesn't know the rules.
I might be wrong but doing what de Klerk did deliberately twice would be grounds for a yellow.Ahh the penalty not be awarding to itoje after that lineout was def a mistake. That i agree with.
Faf gave away 2 penalties in the game. One at the half way line, one at the 22 when you had a 15 phase advantage at the 5. They were irrelevant, no way should he have seen a card.
I dont think the passes deserved a second look at all. They were flat even the english commentators said so
Well he shouldnt have had a chance for the 2nd one. That must be one of the longest advantages in history.I might be wrong but doing what de Klerk did deliberately twice would be grounds for a yellow.
It's just toeing a line and maybe stayed just on the right side.
Speaking of which...
It's working for me to be fair.It's the only remedy
It's working for me to be fair.