Dearie me, that is beyond ridiculous![]()
The fact that you believed me reflects poorly on the IRB.

Dearie me, that is beyond ridiculous![]()
You have this amazing ability to suck any joy that exists out of anything thats going onEnjoyed the game. I've enjoyed the whole tournament.
Pretty unconvincing world champions though. Second best to Ireland, second best in large parts to 14 man New Zealand, lucky against France and didn't really deserve to beat England either, albeit due to being drawn into reducer tactics. They won their knockout games by a combined total of 3 points which is, well, crap if we're being honest
Puts a little dampener on it because I thought NZ would have been far more deserving winners, but still its not like SA are a bad side.
Luck and getting a few timely reffing decisions played it’s part, but you cannot fault the absolute clutch-ness of South Africa winning the 3 final knockout games by a point.Enjoyed the game. I've enjoyed the whole tournament.
Pretty unconvincing world champions though. Second best to Ireland, second best in large parts to 14 man New Zealand, lucky against France and didn't really deserve to beat England either, albeit due to being drawn into reducer tactics. They won their knockout games by a combined total of 3 points which is, well, crap if we're being honest
Puts a little dampener on it because I thought NZ would have been far more deserving winners, but still its not like SA are a bad side.
He's messing. It's still 20 months before the tournament (instead of the 33 for this one) but the draw will be held in Jan 2026.
The fact that you believed me reflects poorly on the IRB.![]()
Enough time for you to have reverted to a fallow period and that world ranking to have dropped 6 or 7 placesHe's messing. It's still 20 months before the tournament (instead of the 33 for this one) but the draw will be held in Jan 2026.
Enjoyed the game. I've enjoyed the whole tournament.
Pretty unconvincing world champions though. Second best to Ireland, second best in large parts to 14 man New Zealand, lucky against France and didn't really deserve to beat England either, albeit due to being drawn into reducer tactics. They won their knockout games by a combined total of 3 points which is, well, crap if we're being honest
Puts a little dampener on it because I thought NZ would have been far more deserving winners, but still its not like SA are a bad side.
Luck and getting a few timely reffing decisions played it’s part, but you cannot fault the absolute clutch-ness of South Africa winning the 3 final knockout games by a point.
That’s the kind of mentality that other nations would be crying out for
Fair point.True but one of them, even when you are nowhere near your best and at major risk of elimination, you still find a way to pull through and win the game.
You have this amazing ability to suck any joy that exists out of anything thats going on
There were poor decisions in the French match that impacted both teams. Penaud could have been sin-binned at the start of the game for a poor tackle on Eztebeth.Instead of judging what actually happened you are spreading clichés for the sake of it. The reality of the matter is that France lost a game by one point with several key mistakes by the referee including an obvious penalty to France that the referee somehow gave to SA. This has nothing to do with France lacking bottle during the QF also Kolbe was offside on the try conversion.
If you can't acknowledge factual things, say nothing otherwise it's annoying to see bs like the ones you came up with.
How about just stop being such a misery guts in every single thread you ever post in. That would be lovelySorry I'll refrain from saying I enjoyed the game and enjoyed the whole tournament in future, in case this sucks the joy out of everything for you
Note I also included Ireland, and was also referencing Ireland's inability to get beyond the quarters. But France have been a brilliant rugby team for a long time now, but don't have a RWC to show for it.Get out... France not only lost to the actual greatest ever team only 8-7 in 2011, but they actually knocked them out in the previous tournament as well as turning up for the greatest match in the history of Rugby also knocking out an ultra favoured All Blacks in 99. Sure they haven't finished it with a cup, but they've only truly had one seriously massive bottle job in 2007 when England beat them on their own turf with a historically bad England setup.
How about just stop being such a misery guts in every single thread you ever post in. That would be lovely
How about just stop being such a misery guts in every single thread you ever post in. That would be lovely
Sheesh, feel bad to comment in here in with all the takes coming out on SA. Suddenly, I actually know how it feels being a minority supporter on a forum. Bit awkwardI don't know how they do it.
so I won't say what I really want to say, other than congrats to all the teams that made the rugby world cup a nail biting/thrilling/historic/predictable/boring tournament.
Say it! We won. We had to play the top 6 to win it. People can complain that we crawled over the line, but I don’t think any team has had to play the other top 6 to win the WC. The cumulative fatigue is a real thing in rugby, it’s why the tournament is so longSheesh, feel bad to comment in here in with all the takes coming out on SA. Suddenly, I actually know how it feels being a minority supporter on a forum. Bit awkwardI don't know how they do it.
so I won't say what I really want to say, other than congrats to all the teams that made the rugby world cup a nail biting/thrilling/historic/predictable/boring tournament.
Sheesh, feel bad to comment in here in with all the takes coming out on SA and the tournament in general. Suddenly, I actually know how it feels being a minority supporter on a forum. Bit awkwardI don't know how they do it.
So I won't say what I really want to say, other than congrats to all the teams that made the rugby world cup a nail biting/thrilling/historic/predictable/boring tournament.
I'm sat here in utter disbelief really on just how we did it, it's a phenomenal feat, so hearing it was unconvincing or down to luck or bad reffing, really just makes me think to go where I can actually celebrate what this means to us, it's so much more than just a sport.Say it! We won. We had to play the top 6 to win it. People can complain that we crawled over the line, but I don’t think any team has had to play the other top 6 to win the WC. The cumulative fatigue is a real thing in rugby, it’s why the tournament is so long
I may have to buy an inverter to celebrate! It is massive for us as a country, I don’t think others here realise how much more it is than just a sport.I'm sat here in utter disbelief really on just how we did it, it's a phenomenal feat, so hearing it was unconvincing or down to luck or bad reffing, really just makes me think to go where I can actually celebrate what this means to us, it's so much more than just a sport.
I mean, we have had no loadshedding for a month, and that's purely down to the rugby. Now we gotta go back to the shite of SA once the team comes home. They gave us something to look forward to each weekend.
If I recall, the president said he would make Monday a public holiday if we won it, I hope he keeps his word![]()
Note I also included Ireland, and was also referencing Ireland's inability to get beyond the quarters. But France have been a brilliant rugby team for a long time now, but don't have a RWC to show for it.
I don't think there's anything controversial at all to say Ireland, France and the NH teams in general seem to miss those nerves of steel when it comes to the knockouts in the RWC. I mean, England are the only NH team to have won it, the proof is in decades of RWC history.
Goalkicking let New Zealand down, for whatever reason they didn't have their kicking boots on. On another day they would have kicked that conversion and penalty over.
Looks like he's joining the English ticket after the world cupAny chance Felix Jones joining us after World Cup can let us into the SA secrets after being with them for last two tournaments
Looks like he's joining the English ticket after the world cup
What were they thinking not taking points,kicking for the corner is such a risky strategy when the game is so close.
New Zealand thought they could force the issue and get the ball over line with a temporary man advantage. It was an almighty gamble, but I actually think if they had scored directly from the resulting line-out I could see them running away with it and win comfortably. I don't think South Africa were much of a threat at all on the attack all night.
Yeah that lack of threat in second half is why I feel absolutely gutted SA won AGAIN. After watching some YouTube videos reacting to defeat I will be supporting them in any other game now apart from when they play England. I so wanted to face them in the final.
South Africa in the grand scheme of things still deserving winners on the day, though. They defended valiantly with Du Toit, Vermeulen and De Klerk playing the game of their lives respectively despite obvious fatigue setting in and in the process forced New Zealand to make mistakes. As funny as this might sound the only game they didn't quite deserve to win was last week against England.
I’ll quite happily give you the development of the game aspect. The second and third tiers of the game aren’t growing like you would hope despite some exciting moments from Portugal and Chile. The fact the USA didn’t make it at all is damning.OK, cold light of morning review of this world cup.
First game between NZ and France was tense but ultimately low quality, lots of long kicking down the middle back and forth. Other notable group stage games were Ireland v SA (again tense, low scoring bit gripping more than entertaining), and what else? Wales hammering Australia? The group stages will ultimately be remembered for the lack of trepidation, huge blow-outs in the majority of games involving tier 1 countries, and more alarmingly - a real regression in the likes of Japan, Argentina, Italy. Include Scotland in that too, especially when you see how bad they've been at u20 level.
i think its fair to say that it hadnt been a good world cup for spotting improvement or growth in the game. Obviously you could argue Portugal looked like entering maybe tier 2? Fiji should be happy enough but difficult to see how they grow further.
Quarter finals - SA France was game of the tournament, great to watch. Ireland NZ also a good game, first half especially, but Ireland failing to win after playing against 14 for 20 mins and getting a penalty try kind of sums Iteland up at QF stage. The two other QFs were also good games in and of themselves, but very much in a way that everyone knew the winners weren't coming from those games.
One awful SF which was never in danger of being a contest, one close nail biter of very low quality. A final that was close and tense and gripping but ultimately had one try (despite rarely having 30 players on the pitch) and a result heavily influenced by red and yellow cards.
I think that's a fair summary.
OK, cold light of morning review of this world cup.
First game between NZ and France was tense but ultimately low quality, lots of long kicking down the middle back and forth. Other notable group stage games were Ireland v SA (again tense, low scoring bit gripping more than entertaining), and what else? Wales hammering Australia? The group stages will ultimately be remembered for the lack of trepidation, huge blow-outs in the majority of games involving tier 1 countries, and more alarmingly - a real regression in the likes of Japan, Argentina, Italy. Include Scotland in that too, especially when you see how bad they've been at u20 level.
i think its fair to say that it hadnt been a good world cup for spotting improvement or growth in the game. Obviously you could argue Portugal looked like entering maybe tier 2? Fiji should be happy enough but difficult to see how they grow further.
Quarter finals - SA France was game of the tournament, great to watch. Ireland NZ also a good game, first half especially, but Ireland failing to win after playing against 14 for 20 mins and getting a penalty try kind of sums Iteland up at QF stage. The two other QFs were also good games in and of themselves, but very much in a way that everyone knew the winners weren't coming from those games.
One awful SF which was never in danger of being a contest, one close nail biter of very low quality. A final that was close and tense and gripping but ultimately had one try (despite rarely having 30 players on the pitch) and a result heavily influenced by red and yellow cards.
I think that's a fair summary.
I’ll quite happily give you the development of the game aspect. The second and third tiers of the game aren’t growing like you would hope despite some exciting moments from Portugal and Chile. The fact the USA didn’t make it at all is damning.
Group stages inevitably have one-sides fixtures. The fact that the best match of the groups was South Africa vs Ireland….and all we’ve had on here is a thousand Irish posts moaning about the draw shows you can’t have it all ways. Stacked groups - better group games - uneven draw.
I think from the knockout onwards it’s been an excellent WC. The fact that all the quarters were right down to the wire and contained some of the finest rugby ever seen….I don’t know how you (and others) could be disappointed with that.
One semi was a beating but the other one and the final were tense and exciting. You don’t always get the best spectacle when it comes to the biggest games…..seems to always be the case when I get hyped up for a big football match anyway.
Overall I rated it highly. The one downside as is someone inevitable is a) consistency of reffing, and b) people’s attitude to reffing. I think in 10/20 years we’ll look back on Rassie Erasmus as a really negative on the game for enabling a football-esk vitriol towards refs. It’s an area of the game that needs to improve but it can’t be done by shitting on them left right and centre
I enjoyed it (particularly the knock out stages) but what are you using as a benchmark? Previous RWCs? Or the football version? Ultimately rugby union is what it is:
- limited number of countries playing at s competitive level with an even smaller pool of potential winners
- physically intensive sport making upsets more difficult and requiring longer breaks between games (a feeling exacerbated this time by beginning in the heat of early September and ending in cold dark rainy nights)
- an over-complicated rulebook around scrums and rucks, leaving much to the discretion of the referee of the day
The expansion to 24 teams for 2027 doesn’t sound like a step in the right direction. The most we can hope for is further development of Pacific Island teams, a less terrible Australia and a stronger England and Wales. As for the rules issue, I have no idea how to fix it. I don’t want union to turn into league but the current balance isn’t right.