At times I don't fully understand why teams kick.
Edit - not doubting them, I literally don't understand.
Edit - not doubting them, I literally don't understand.
At times I don't fully understand why teams kick.
Edit - not doubting them, I literally don't understand.
I wonder if the Australia media will now appreciate that this is the actual level of the wallabies instead of dancing around hoping they’re world class.
The failure of rugby Australia post the 2003 World Cup will go down as the most shambolic shit show of piss poor management in sports history. Literally went from back to back World Cup finals to the sport teetering on returning to semi professional and code nearly broke.
well done you private school dickheads
Well in fairness we drop the ball every time we try more than three passes in a row. Might as gain some ground before giving them the ball back.For England it’s the game plan. The very boring, safety first, game plan.
England will win this. The way they play is dreadful for all the resources they have though. Embarrassing really.
For England it’s the game plan. The very boring, safety first, game plan.
Well in fairness we drop the ball every time we try more than three passes in a row. Might as gain some ground before giving them the ball back.
OK.
It also puzzles me in other games. Is it to get a breather and reset sometimes?
Absolutely!Forget the wider resources, the players on the pitch surely have the talent to play better rugby?
No, generally it's in the context of territory gain. You kick, chase and put pressure in the opposition's half. That's how France, South Africa and Ireland largely dominate teams.
The issue is that many teams don't have a good kicking game.
So many little errors from Japan that will ultimately gift the game to England. Win you're scrum there, go through a phase, kick out for HT. But now they've just given England 3 points instead.
You don’t hire Borthwick if you want to play like that. I’m not massively bothered by having a kick heavy game, I’d back Steward and Daly in the air, but it’s almost comical at times how bad it is with ball in hand. I get that it’s humid, but it also seems to be a lot of passes not being put into the right places.There’s been way more handling errors than usual in this WC. Everyone’s at it. Humidity seems to be making the ball slippy. But why not back yourself? At least give it a go?
So many little errors from Japan that will ultimately gift the game to England. Win you're scrum there, go through a phase, kick out for HT. But now they've just given England 3 points instead.
OK. I have watched our game evolve (with a huge degree of ignorance) from an almost entirely kicking based game into a much more expansive ball in hand style so I think I associate it with a regressive style.
I get when you can get behind and or put pressure on the receiver, but the end to end kicking exchanges with no pressure baffles me.
Errors aside. Their line out will be the main reason they lose. Can’t win a game of rugby when your own throw is a coin toss as to who ends up with the ball.
Forget the wider resources, the players on the pitch surely have the talent to play better rugby?
OK.
It also puzzles me in other games. Is it to get a breather and reset sometimes?
OK. I have watched our game evolve (with a huge degree of ignorance) from an almost entirely kicking based game into a much more expansive ball in hand style so I think I associate it with a regressive style.
I get when you can get behind and or put pressure on the receiver, but the end to end kicking exchanges with no pressure baffles me.
I don't know, Fiji just won and their line-out was shite! (but you are right generally)
Quality in this game is diabolical. No one is taking any authority.
That georgian referee is flawless. It's been nearly 18 months of nearly perfect refereeing.