jamesjimmybyrondean
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 7,351
I though he was 24...when did he become 26??
I though he was 24...when did he become 26??
2 years after he was 24I though he was 24...when did he become 26??
The unidirectional nature of time is hard to grapple with. Hug me, brothers.I though he was 24...when did he become 26??
2 years after he was 24
You've been in coma for 2 years. Welcome back.I though he was 24...when did he become 26??
Fully agreeI've never been a fan, I think he's a bit slow. But it's hard to deny he would have been a godsend for us over the past few games, someone who understands how to sit deep, screen and ping passes about competently. As he'll be relatively cheap, I'd be open to it.
In principle I agree but what if can’t or won’t get the super elite player we really want?This one is a "no" from me. Not enough of an upgrade. Saying he's better than x or y isn't a good enough reason to buy him. We need a world-class player in there
He's a vast upgrade on Mctominay and Fred (as a 6) so look at it like that. And not so expensive that we couldn't get another midfielder in too that could raise our ceiling.This one is a "no" from me. Not enough of an upgrade. Saying he's better than x or y isn't a good enough reason to buy him. We need a world-class player in there
He's a vast upgrade on Mctominay and Fred (as a 6) so look at it like that. And not so expensive that we couldn't get another midfielder in too that could raise our ceiling.
But as it stands we're quite good at full strength but disastrous when our main players are out, so quality squad depth is as important as getting a shiny new world class player in.
I think most would but that doesn't mean we should spunk big money on him.Id take him over Sabitzer
Who said anything about big money?I think most would but that doesn't mean we should spunk big money on him.
Who said anything about big money?
Ha! You always ask these little questions.How much would you pay
Ha! You always ask these little questions.
How much do you think it would cost us to actually get him?
This one is a "no" from me. Not enough of an upgrade. Saying he's better than x or y isn't a good enough reason to buy him. We need a world-class player in there
Far too many other needs to think about replacing Cas or Eriksen. For now we just need a decent backup option nothing more nothing less.
If Wolves go down he'd be a fantastic signing on a reasonable fee.
The post was following the context of them being relegatedDepends if they stay up
The post was following the context of them being relegated
Isn't he out of contact? That should be a no brainer.
agreed
No, a year left.Isn't he out of contact? That should be a no brainer.
So would he provide cover for Casa
He’s more of a no8 than a no6 but could fill in at no6. However, the blend is important. As you say, Neves and Eriksen wouldn’t be so good. Probably Fred would be a better partner for him but I don’t like Fred in a MF Two. All in all, I wouldn’t see Neves being a good option for us at no6.Casemiro is 94th percentile in tackles, Neves is only 56th. Interceptions Casemiro is in the 91th, Neves 81th, Blocks Casemiro is in 99th, Neves is in 85th. Clearences is clearly where Neves shines but still in a lower percentile than Case. Casemiro is in the 99th again but Neves is in the 98th which is very good.
Aerials is where it gets very bad again. Case is in the 96th percentile whereas Neves is as low as 42nd percentile.
This is going to be quite the issue when the main partner at the moment would be Eriksen.
He has a few stats where he is good, but he actually gets beaten on every defensive stat bar interceptions and blocks by Scott McTominay.
So no I dont think he would be a good cover.
you think he'd come to us knowing he was a back-up?He's a vast upgrade on Mctominay and Fred (as a 6) so look at it like that. And not so expensive that we couldn't get another midfielder in too that could raise our ceiling.
But as it stands we're quite good at full strength but disastrous when our main players are out, so quality squad depth is as important as getting a shiny new world class player in.
Thats a good question, and it's something I've been banging on about on other thread's when people put together fantasy lists of players. Ambitious players may not want to come if it's obvious they're not going to be first choice, especially if they're offered first team status elsewhere.you think he'd come to us knowing he was a back-up?
He’s not a natural no6. I think he is more of a playmaking no8 but ends up in the no6 part of the pitch quite a bit. If played at a better team, with Case, for example, he would spend more time a little further up the pitch. If we bought him it would be to share the load with Eriksen imo.Thats a good question, and it's something I've been banging on about on other thread's when people put together fantasy lists of players. Ambitious players may not want to come if it's obvious they're not going to be first choice, especially if they're offered first team status elsewhere.
I'm assuming that our midfield buys will be for flexible 8s that can also do a good job at 6 (or even 10). So the question is, can Neves play competently as an 8? Answer - I don't know, but he's played most of his career at 6.
He’s not a natural no6. I think he is more of a playmaking no8 but ends up in the no6 part of the pitch quite a bit. If played at a better team, with Case, for example, he would spend more time a little further up the pitch. If we bought him it would be to share the load with Eriksen imo.
I don't know if he'd be able to play next to Eriksen or another midfielder who doesn't do much defensively, but I think he'd be fine next to someone who is also solid defensively. I expect Neves-Fred would be fine for example...except perhaps the lack of aerial ability there which would be my one worry there.Casemiro is 94th percentile in tackles, Neves is only 56th. Interceptions Casemiro is in the 91th, Neves 81th, Blocks Casemiro is in 99th, Neves is in 85th. Clearences is clearly where Neves shines but still in a lower percentile than Case. Casemiro is in the 99th again but Neves is in the 98th which is very good.
Aerials is where it gets very bad again. Case is in the 96th percentile whereas Neves is as low as 42nd percentile.
This is going to be quite the issue when the main partner at the moment would be Eriksen.
He has a few stats where he is good, but he actually gets beaten on every defensive stat bar interceptions and blocks by Scott McTominay.
So no I dont think he would be a good cover.
I don't know if he'd be able to play next to Eriksen or another midfielder who doesn't do much defensively, but I think he'd be fine next to someone who is also solid defensively. I expect Neves-Fred would be fine for example...except perhaps the lack of aerial ability there which would be my one worry there.