Mine too. To the extent where I'd keep them all apart from Scholes for Ince and Van Nistelrooy or Ronaldo for Hughes.
And w/r/t Keane picking Ince, I remember he did the same thing on another show a few years ago (on Sky too, I think) and someone made the case for Scholes and Keane said with a smile he probably should have picked him. I dunno, I think it's his nature to do this kind of thing. I remember how passionately he was defending the decision to send Nani off against Real Madrid in 2013 with that steely gaze, head gone, driven more by personal bias than logic. If that was now, with Ferguson not at the helm, I don't believe he would have defended the red card so much.
More annoying is Carragher seemingly implying United would have won more with Gerrard than Scholes, and Liverpool would've won less with Scholes than Gerrard, and Keane accepting such drivel! Plus Carragher said Lampard and Scholes couldn't do what Gerrard did in the 2005 CL final and the 2006 FA Cup final, and Keane agreed to that too? Gerrard's performance in 2005 has been highly overrated - he was all over the place in the first half and Hamann stablized the midfield in the second. Even then, Dudek helped them out a lot plus they had two other goalscorers, but the narrative is Gerrard won it on his own. There's a lot Scholes does better than Gerrard, but because he hasn't got the engine a simple-minded guy like Carragher won't rate him highly, and his old captain can't even be bothered to defend him.