Why Varane deserves to be here
I wanted to lay more into why Varane deserves to be on this stage. Everyone has seen him play and if you look at his skill-set, he is pretty much the complete package. Tall, fast, strong, no mug on the ball, great header, great at defending with his feet. He has the perfect abilities for the stopper-role and he is also really, really good in covering for his team mates. You have to be really good at that if you are playing next Carvajal/Ramos/Marcelo in an attacking team with a high line. He also never had a GOAT keeper behind him, Lloris and Navas have been good in patches but also quite error prone in certain moments.
He is still just 25 and that may seem too young, but he has played on a very high level since he came to Real at 18. This is 19-years-old Varane putting in a MotM performance vs Barca and peak Messi.
Varane has had a very similar club career like Santamaria, playing the same role for the same club and winning the same trophies (both 4 CL). They also played a major part in winning 3 of those 4 CL. Varane played every minute of the 2014, 2017 and 2018 final and only missed the 2016 final because of a severe injury, which caused him to drop out of the Euros.
Now let's have a look at their national team careers.
Varane played with 21 years as a starter next to Sakho in the 2014 World Cup and France conceded just 3 goals in 5 games. He was not faultless because Hummels was his man in the QF and he lost the duel, but he was still recognized with an entry on the 3-men-shortlist for best young player.
In 2018, he was the best defender at the World Cup and the most consistent player in a French side, which banked all their success on stability (and Mbappe up front). Besides the freak 4-3 against Argentina (in which he was not faultless I have to say), France conceded 0 goals from open play in 6 games. In 3 group stage games just 1 goal from a handball pen by Umtiti, against Uruguay and Belgium zero goals against and Croatia was the best side all tournament in creating goals from open play, yet they couldn't do it against Varane and the french defence. Perisic scored on a set piece and Lloris had a massive howler at the end, but the french wall kept tight.
It is right to say that Varane had absolute match winning influence on several of those close ties in the knockout stages. Uruguay vs France was a stand-off between two counter-attacking sides and he broke the deadlock with the crucial 1-0. His biggest achievement was him holding the defence together against the best attack in the tournament. Lukaku just destroyed Brazil's backline in the QF, yet Umtiti and Varane handled him masterfully. He was also sensational in key moments against Hazard, the best attacker at the world cup. When Hazard ran rings around Pavard, he was there to prevent serious damage.
This video shows some of his defending in the world cup, including 2 key actions against Hazard and some passes as well.
Let's look at what Santamaria did at the World Cup.
In 1962, he played for Spain and came last in a group with Brazil, Czechoslovakia and Mexico.
1954 was his only World Cup with Uruguay and he was in the Team of the Tournament. His side kept 2 clean sheets in the group stage against Czechoslovakia (not the good version with Masopust) and in a 7-0 waltzing over Scotland. In the knockout stage came the first big opponent, England with Matthews and Finney on the flanks scored 2 against Uruguay. Yet Uruguay prevailed and went on to face Hungary in the SF, only to lose 2-4 after extra time. The 3rd place playoff reads 3-1 for Austria, that adds up to 9 goals conceded in 3 knockout stage matches.
He did reach the team of the tournament and that will hold up over time, but is it worth that much when you look at the quality of Centerbacks in 1954 (and the 50s in general)?. The best sides at the world cup (Hungary and Germany) were incredibly top heavy and lacked quality at the back. Austria had some good center backs, but I would count Ocwirk as a central midfielder in a modern positional sense and I don't even know if there was one other CB in the 50s (besides Santamaria) who was as good as Diego Godin? Varane outshined Godin at the World Cup in my book and I will happily give Santamaria the title of best CB of the 50s, but who was the competition really?
Look at those parallels to CB discussions of this decade
I didn't write this to bash Santamaria or to say he was not a great defender cause he was. I wrote this to convey why Varane deserves to be on this stage as much as Santamaria deserves to be here