sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Terminate the contract, which Ronaldo certainly would accept.
If he has no suitors, I bet he will expect to be paid to leave.
Terminate the contract, which Ronaldo certainly would accept.
Exactly.
I especially like what ETH explained, simple and clear, the plan and roadmap,
1. Construct the team and only add new players who are the right ones; if impossible to find, develop by ourselves
2. Has a good concept
3. Grow and develop as a team (playing and management) with togetherness
Terminate the contract, which Ronaldo certainly would accept.
Like?We should get rid and sign a #9 who either already at, or just coming into, the prime of his career. Someone who will press and work for the team, but also bang in 20 league goals per season.
If we can't find a player like that, then we will unfortunately have to keep him.
Perhaps if money grew on trees
Like?
Im all for asking scouts to find players, but strikers coming to their prime is common knowledge and if we cant think of any its probably unreasonable to demand that.No idea.
Would it be cheaper to keep paying him 350k a week?
You tell me?
Ultimately the club will want a replacement. Without one why forgo a transfer fee?
Additionally Ronaldo would likely want paying out wouldn’t he? Even more so if he can’t find another club.
Just dont play him, simple. Tell him that, he wont have any leverege so….
I'm no economist, but it sounds like terminating the contract would be best for both parties. We won't get a transfer fee regardless, and we would end up paying £350k a week to a player who might cause more problems than solutions.
Wow. Show this argument to all these Ronaldo fanboys and blind media who make it seems like Ronaldo is paramount to us scoring goals. This only shows that he has indeed affected our team output negatively. This team is capable of scoring loads of goals but spent last year bending to Ronaldo's will at the expense of the group.I just realised that United went from 112 goals in all comps in 2019/20, to 120 goals in all comps in 2020/21 to 70 goals in all comps in 2021/22. This is why I don't understand (and have never understood) this tortured rhetoric about United being unable to cope without Ronaldo or the idea that his goals are somehow crucial to the team. By every available metric he's made the team worse.
Yes we can and we have to, and why would we care? Otherwise we make the same mistakes again as in the past.Yeah I agree but we can't have someone on those wages and not play them.
Im all for asking scouts to find players, but strikers coming to their prime is common knowledge and if we cant think of any its probably unreasonable to demand that.
Sadly the second part of your post will probably happen
Juventus were glad to be rid of him and now united look to do the same. There’s a reason hardly any other clubs worth their salt want him.
So who pays Ronaldo out? We’d be liable unless you think he’s going to happily waver that when he doesn’t even have another club to take him?
Sounds far fetched to me
In theory we could reach an agreement with him to terminate the contract.
As in - mutual termination, he's a free agent (but he loses a year's wages from United).
Would mean he gives up a couple of dozen millions. No way in hell, if Utd want to get rid of him they'll have to pay him out. Better option might be to give him a little extra to make him happy again for a season and collect the 20 goals. Let him destroy Europa League.Oh of course but I don’t see any player agreeing to that without a club lined up?
Oh of course but I don’t see any player agreeing to that without a club lined up?
Leave Britney alone.I see we've reached the stage where Roanldo is to blame for the war in Ukraine, the rising cost of living and fuel prices in the UK... it's Rooney/Carrick all over again
This only shows that he has indeed affected our team output negatively. This team is capable of scoring loads of goals but spent last year bending to Ronaldo's will at the expense of the group.
In theory we could reach an agreement with him to terminate the contract.
As in - mutually agreed termination, he's a free agent (but he loses a year's wages from United).
For a "smaller" club, like - say - Sporting it would make a big difference if he were a free agent: whatever transfer fee United would be entitled to (market price) would be a lot of money to them.
(Just speculating wildly, of course.)
The only buzzword missing here is synergies but I guess that's too mid 00s.As if team goals are just down to the individual - and not result of dynamics, style, tactics, systems, fluidity, form, morale, partnerships, patterns etc etc
Martial's reportedly done his hamstring mate. We knew it would come, so yeah, we need a quality replacement in pronto.I m not worry about CF options. Martial is starting to find some of his old good Martial back.
United has been strongly linked with the promising upcoming Sesko. And Patrick Schick is still at Bayer Leverkusen. Not a top club like Bayern who will never sell theirs best players.
So really good CF replacement for Ronaldo are realistic to get out there. If Ronaldo is leaving.
I m more worry for Frenkie De Jong transfer saga. Hope it doesn't take so long. Too long and he is not coming. Then really short time left to find alternative for De Jong. It will lift the price of De Jong alternative option up. Because the seller club know United is in need to alternative option. Late in the transfer window is not the most ideal time to do transfer.
United XI line up might be really good. I m satisfy with the current XI line up. But United is lacking the squad depth quality? Why. To be honest. None of United youngster a ready and good enough to strenght and boost United champion league chance.
All of Hannibal, Zidane, Savage, Diallo and Chong. Sorry to say. They are good, but not top class talent at their age. Good but not good enough.
If United can get Sesko. Then CF options are good without Ronaldo. Not RW and CM squad depth. Because with 433. Eriksen is a starter, not a squad depth player. Then United have just youngster there in central midfield. Worry.
The only buzzword missing here is synergies but I guess that's too mid 00s.
Goals aren't all down to the individual, but if you remove all the individuals that have a history of scoring goals and replace them with individuals who do not have such a history, you are going to score less goals.
I suspect a Ronaldo with no transfer fee and reduced wages (reportedly he is willing to do this) suddenly becomes an attractive option for many clubs.
Wow. Show this argument to all these Ronaldo fanboys and blind media who make it seems like Ronaldo is paramount to us scoring goals. This only shows that he has indeed affected our team output negatively. This team is capable of scoring loads of goals but spent last year bending to Ronaldo's will at the expense of the group.
What's even funnier is people would have you believe that if you remove Ronaldo from our team last season you can automatically remove 24 goal, which would put us at 46 goals total.
Juventus removed Ronaldo from their team last summer and they went from a 77-goal season in which he scored 29 goals, to a 57 goal season. that's a 20 goal deficit. Real Madrid removed Ronaldo from their team four years ago and they went from a 94-goal season in which he scored 26 goals, to a 63 goal season. That's a 31 goal deficit.
That's actually a pretty solid relationship between "take Ronaldo out of your team" and "lose a shit ton of goals."
This is a good counter. It just tells us that it's more than just 1 player affecting a team's performances positively or negativelyWhen Juventus added Ronaldo to their team in 2018 they went from a 87-goal season to a 70 goal season, when he came to United we went from 73 goals to 57. So there's also a solid relationship between "add Ronaldo to your team" and "don't score as many goals".