Fracture90
Full Member
You're mistaken. They're talking about Belloti.
In that case I stand corrected!
You're mistaken. They're talking about Belloti.
This is literally impossible.getting Romelu Lukaku is one thing and paying such a high price for it is a totally different thing. I don't think Jose would want to buy a high profile striker such as he. Even if he does prepare to spend a 100 million, the sane choice would be Griezmann or Reus or even Neymar. Although i have nothing against Lukaku, he's an amazing players with huge skills. Rooney and Lukaku straight swap crossed my mind but yet, i don't see it happening.
This is literally impossible.
What aspects of the game is Kane superior, just out of interest?You'd think Kane would cost more besides being English though, he has a better all round game and seems pretty level headed and grounded, while Lukaku appears more selfish, the airing of his desire to leave for instance, I don't think Kane would cause that same stir.
But you're right the biggest reason he should be going for less is his contract situation in comparisson.
What aspects of the game is Kane superior, just out of interest?
Not really, unless you feel converting penalties is a sign of being a clinical finisher. Kane has 16 non penalty league goals from 72 shots (I subtracted penalties), Lukaku has 24 non penalty league goals from 94 shots. Inside the box its and 68 Lukaku and 49 KaneTechnique, touch and finishing. Kane is more clinical than Lukaku and plays with both feet. He also seems to be more of a big game player.
Lukaku is more powerful and quicker and is better at taking players on, not as clinical.
Not really, unless you feel converting penalties is a sign of being a clinical finisher. Kane has 16 non penalty league goals from 72 shots (I subtracted penalties), Lukaku has 24 non penalty league goals from 94 shots. Inside the box its and 68 Lukaku and 49 Kane
Lukaku has a better conversion than Kane on everything. A higher proportion of his shots go in, whether you include long range or just inside the area. How Kane is more clinical? must be magic.
Lukaku also scores more headers and has more assists
Not to be an anorak but the official Premier league site has Kane having missed 9 "big chances" and Lukaku 8 big chances. Obviously when we have an idea in our minds, we kind of stick to it, but both Schneiderlin and Koeman have claimed Lukaku is an awesome finisher. Schneiderlin said that was the aspect of his game that surprised him the mostKane makes more speculative shots, its sometimes one of his negative points. When it comes to clear cut chances Kane is more clinical.
Will Lukaku refuse to play in a World Cup year ?
Even with one year on his contact he would demand around 60 million. He is a rare commodity.
Not really, unless you feel converting penalties is a sign of being a clinical finisher. Kane has 16 non penalty league goals from 72 shots (I subtracted penalties), Lukaku has 24 non penalty league goals from 94 shots. Inside the box its and 68 Lukaku and 49 Kane
Lukaku has a better conversion than Kane on everything. A higher proportion of his shots go in, whether you include long range or just inside the area. How Kane is more clinical? must be magic.
Lukaku also scores more headers and has more assists
Didn't he say he will not be renewing his contract, if we leave it for another year his value will drop significantly!
We also have the option of giving them Rooney, and possibly Jones so i reckon if we give them £30m plus Rooney and Jones it should be just about enough.
Not to be an anorak but the official Premier league site has Kane having missed 9 "big chances" and Lukaku 8 big chances. Obviously when we have an idea in our minds, we kind of stick to it, but both Schneiderlin and Koeman have claimed Lukaku is an awesome finisher. Schneiderlin said that was the aspect of his game that surprised him the most
Didn't he say he will not be renewing his contract, if we leave it for another year his value will drop significantly!
We also have the option of giving them Rooney, and possibly Jones so i reckon if we give them £30m plus Rooney and Jones it should be just about enough.
Last season both players missed 18 big chances so there are many instances when Kane will do the same nonsense as Lukaku and miss easy chances. Also the Euros showed us how Kane can be..........Did he get on the scoresheet?Im not basing it on this season only. Ive watched both players and Kane is the more clinical of the two. The semi final last season is a prime example of how Lukaku can sometimes be.
Last season both players missed 18 big chances so there are many instances when Kane will do the same nonsense as Lukaku and miss easy chances. Also the Euros showed us how Kane can be..........Did he get on the scoresheet?
I am just playing by the way. its difficult to tell for me either way but Kane was funny in the EurosOn that note I bow out.
Personally when i've sat down to watch Spurs over the last 2-3 years I'd say, Better with his feet as in... more consistent with his first touch, sharper football brain regarding his running and much better with his back to goal and bringing others into play.
Kane had a so-so first half to this season where a lot of his goals came from penaltys but he's still doing well and finishing strongly.
Lukaku obviously has advantages too, more physical and pace etc but as an all round striker I must confess I've liked Kane since the first time I saw him play.
Would you accept that deal if the situations were reversed?
I'd give them Rooney + 40M£ for Lukaku, no more !
With 100M£ I'd go for Griezmann.
Everton are buying our players for nothing since 20 years and we should break the bank for an average player of them
Not really, unless you feel converting penalties is a sign of being a clinical finisher. Kane has 16 non penalty league goals from 72 shots (I subtracted penalties), Lukaku has 24 non penalty league goals from 94 shots. Inside the box its and 68 Lukaku and 49 Kane
Lukaku has a better conversion than Kane on everything. A higher proportion of his shots go in, whether you include long range or just inside the area. How Kane is more clinical? must be magic.
Lukaku also scores more headers and has more assists
Technique, touch and finishing. Kane is more clinical than Lukaku and plays with both feet. He also seems to be more of a big game player.
Lukaku is more powerful and quicker and is better at taking players on, not as clinical.
I'm not sure he is a big game player having seen him play poorly for England, still we should have a better idea after this weekend.
Or the other times hes played vs Chelsea Arsenal etc
I'd give them Rooney + 40M£ for Lukaku, no more !
Everton can get 80 million from Lukaku. Rooney is maybe worth of 10 million. And do they even want Rooney? He has lost his pace and scoring ability.
Well with Zlatan pretty much gone as I don't see the board green lighting a contract renewal on £250K a week when he'll be out til January/February we NEED a proven goal scorer in the league and whether anyone wants to admit it or not Lukaku is proven and doing so at a smaller club, I think hes scored more league goals then all of our forwards and midfielders combined if you don't include Zlatan.
Realistically Lukaku will cost £65-£75 million but at 23 years old it's a long term investment and he'd have a sell on value if we only had him for 5 years. I think now we should go all out for Lukaku and Sanchez which added to Rashford, Mkhitarayan, Mata, Martial and Lingard is a forward line that has pretty much everything but mainly pace.
Never getting 100m
He's refusing to sign a contract and isn't even CL proven.
He'll go for around half that