Ji_Maria
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
- Messages
- 608
My word can you lot please stop posting Football Manager nonsense on transfer forums?? I didnt come here to read about how Mata isn't a fast #10.
Thinking about it now, I'm a bit bothered by the price since he only has what, 2 years left on his contract ?
Thinking about it now, I'm a bit bothered by the price since he only has what, 2 years left on his contract ?
I fear we could still be none the wiser this time next week
Since when has that stopped Madrid from spending big on a player with the hype of Pogba. They literally just shelled out 45 mil on a 16 yr old with very few senior caps.They had no reason to spend so much on pogba when they still had Modric and Kroos.
We needed Pogba more and were willing to spend more.
Since when has that stopped Madrid from spending big on a player with the hype of Pogba. They literally just shelled out 45 mil on a 16 yr old with very few senior caps.
Fixed.Since when has that stopped Madrid from spending big on a player with the hype of Pogba. They literally just shelled out 45 mil on a 16 yr old with ZERO senior caps.
Fixed.
Didnt say they didnt want Pogba but that not as much as we did and were not willing to spend as much moneySince when has that stopped Madrid from spending big on a player with the hype of Pogba. They literally just shelled out 45 mil on a 16 yr old with very few senior caps.
Didnt say they didnt want Pogba but that not as much as we did and were not willing to spend as much money
The attack is a different situation with Benzema not performing well, Bale out injured too often and CR getting older. They are more willing to splash on a shinning toy in attack.
With his age, Mbappe would still be a cheap signing at even 150m if he lives up to his potential, as that would be 10-15yrs of top quality and potentially Messi like numbers.
Surely Chelsea can't hijack the deal now, right?
With his age, Mbappe would still be a cheap signing at even 150m if he lives up to his potential, as that would be 10-15yrs of top quality and potentially Messi like numbers.
Surely Chelsea can't hijack the deal now, right?
However, they are not willing to match the fees Lukaku's agent Mino Raiola would earn if the forward joins United.
If he lives up to his potential but that is a big IFIf Mbabpe at 150m is a cheap signing then United have unearthed the new Solskjaer here at half the price!
It is a huge gamble, but his numbers are already better than Messi at the same age.Messi-like numbers? The guy has talent, but that is the pure overrating of him. Anyone who buys him will take a huge gamble, no matter how much he will go for.
It is a huge gamble, but his numbers are already better than Messi at the same age.
and he can potentially exceed their numbersI don't think that matters a lot. Rashford had better numbers than Raúl, Agüero and Messi at 18 after the 2015-16 season.
and he can potentially exceed their numbers
Messi wasnt a regular starter for Barcelona at the same age so cant be a fair comparison. Rooney at the same age has similar numbers, and thats with being played in different positions for us.If he lives up to his potential but that is a big IF
It is a huge gamble, but his numbers are already better than Messi at the same age.
I thought they matched our bid?They'd have to have a bid accepted first.
They haven't.
they offered to match the fee and not match agent fee. I'd imagine everton said it was too late because we were so far advanced. Hence Jim white saying chelsea missed out.I thought they matched our bid?
Chelsea PR in full overdrive. Can't believe Chelsea being the respected club that everyone wants to play for and United being for mercenaries narrative is getting the time of day. The fecking cheek of it.
Simon Stone agreed with Matt Law that chelsea offered to match, but then Law went full salt mode and said Raiola was the big bad guy ruining the deal. it's pretty obvious chelsea are briefing their mouthpieces to save face.Yeah, that's what it is. If they were getting him, it'd have been done by now.
I said something like this a while ago somewhere here on this board: at the rate the market is going, Everton would be more than happy to keep him for another year if they don't have a good offer. Reason is a good season from Lukaku & impressive season for Everton (he needs to try his best for the upcoming WC) would be worth alot than selling him 20mil, 30 mil below the price range they want. Even with one year contract, Lukaku can still fetch up a good price given the lack of quality forward around the world, and if Lukaku continues to perform, there would be more clubs to compete for his signing. Clubs would be desperate as they don't want Lukaku just run his contract down & goes to a lucky bastard of a club. Lukaku is a PL homegrown so again would cost a bit more. Back to the first point & key point: market rate. It is crazy now. There is every chance it would get crazier next year.Thinking about it now, I'm a bit bothered by the price since he only has what, 2 years left on his contract ?
Come on. It's not hard. Lukaku prefers Chelsea. But chelsea won't pay that amount which is absolutely taking the piss. Everton want united because of the money and so does his agent. Lukaku isn't exactly upset at moving to United, at the end of the day he wants a step up. But the idea this is a 'failure' on chelsea's part is a joke. They didn't want to spend that money on him. So they didn't. If they wanted to, he would have signed for chelsea by now.
Chelsea PR in full overdrive. Can't believe Chelsea being the respected club that everyone wants to play for and United being for mercenaries narrative is getting the time of day. The fecking cheek of it.
Not even talking about Mbappe. Just bringing forth this notion that Madrid didn't spend big on Pogba because of the cost being so high. That has hardly ever stopped Madrid.Didnt say they didnt want Pogba but that not as much as we did and were not willing to spend as much money
The attack is a different situation with Benzema not performing well, Bale out injured too often and CR getting older. They are more willing to splash on a shinning toy in attack.
With his age, Mbappe would still be a cheap signing at even 150m if he lives up to his potential, as that would be 10-15yrs of top quality and potentially Messi like numbers.
Interesting play by us if it's true we've matched Lukaku's transfer fee and wages but not the agent fee - perhaps it's a preconceived plan to expose the corrupt nature of agent involvement?
The Premier League paid £174m to agents, up from £130m, with Manchester City being the biggest spenders (£26.3m) ahead of Chelsea (£25.1m) and Manchester United (£19m).
Come on. It's not hard. Lukaku prefers Chelsea. But chelsea won't pay that amount which is absolutely taking the piss. Everton want united because of the money and so does his agent. Lukaku isn't exactly upset at moving to United, at the end of the day he wants a step up. But the idea this is a 'failure' on chelsea's part is a joke. They didn't want to spend that money on him. So they didn't. If they wanted to, he would have signed for chelsea by now.
Then why have they matched our bid? Or is it Monopoly money which they flashed to Everton?Come on. It's not hard. Lukaku prefers Chelsea. But chelsea won't pay that amount which is absolutely taking the piss. Everton want united because of the money and so does his agent. Lukaku isn't exactly upset at moving to United, at the end of the day he wants a step up. But the idea this is a 'failure' on chelsea's part is a joke. They didn't want to spend that money on him. So they didn't. If they wanted to, he would have signed for chelsea by now.
He literally just pulled you in with the white text.Lol. Seriously, people still keep saying things like this? Simply, it's not the case.
Come on. It's not hard. Lukaku prefers Chelsea. But chelsea won't pay that amount which is absolutely taking the piss. Everton want united because of the money and so does his agent. Lukaku isn't exactly upset at moving to United, at the end of the day he wants a step up. But the idea this is a 'failure' on chelsea's part is a joke. They didn't want to spend that money on him. So they didn't. If they wanted to, he would have signed for chelsea by now.
Is he a Chelsea fan? Cannot be sure with that post especially after last night.Yes, keep on deluding yourself that a club will let go of their top target because they refused to pay the agent fees which United is paying(i'm guessing the difference is around 5m) by all accounts, Chelsea have matched the bid of around 75+15m. The whole joke in all this is your post.
Direct from The Shed End. Chelsea and Roman will be the leading light against agents greed in football.
Errr...
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/39526917
No club has bottomless pocketsNot even talking about Mbappe. Just bringing forth this notion that Madrid didn't spend big on Pogba because of the cost being so high. That has hardly ever stopped Madrid.
Is he a Chelsea fan? Cannot be sure with that post especially after last night.
That's not how football works though. If that were the case, Rashford would be rated at more than 100 mil because he has better numbers than Kane at similar ages.If he lives up to his potential but that is a big IF
It is a huge gamble, but his numbers are already better than Messi at the same age.