TheBiggest
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 519
2001 when we signed Ruud he would have been 25, a single year older than Lukaku right now and we'd have brought him in a year earlier at 24, the exact age as Lukaku but he sadly missed the season through injury, so not 27 peak, we're talking Ruud here at 25 and Lukaku at 24.
Just because Ruud had a slower start to his career and Lukaku a fast start (playing professional football since 2009! mind) doesn't mean anything for the player Ruud became. Some start their careers earlier and peak/finish earlier, see Mr.Rooney as an example
99-2003 was arguably the most talented team United have ever had, Ruud in 2003 almost carried us to the title by himself, in a team containing Keane, Becks, Scholes, Giggs , a lot of our all time greatest players he was seen as right up there in talent and importance.
If he was so limited a player as you claim, in That team, with those players, he'd have stood out like a sore thumb instead, you making him out to be some glorified poacher is fecking outrageous.
And back on the topic of that Everton fans take on him, the only thing that makes him sound anything like Ruud is the fact he wrote he's clinical, thats literally about the only similarity I see, the negatives written certainly don't sound like the Ruud I knew and loved.
There you go, I broke it up for you so you. Ps. I really like your condescending laugh smiley replies.
I have zero idea what you are arguing.