SATA
Full Member
And so i presume everyone is presuming RvP will join United? You couldn't fault for me saying that looking at the way the past few pages have been talking. It's all formations, teamtalk, tactics and what not with him in the loop
What player?
If he doesn't, he's an idiot. Of course he knows that this will harm Danny's career, but clearly thinks our short-term need is more important, and has presumably sanctioned Danny's (apparently) massive contract to try and keep the boy from jumping ship whilst playing back-up to Van Persie. This transfer disconcerts me on a few levels, but mostly it's to do with Fergie seeming to throw out everything a lot of his measured and long-termist approach to management for a big, immediate fix. It all rather suggests that City's 'success' has got to him, and that he's planning to go sooner rather than later.
Yeah, Danny Welbeck won't possibly play any games of football if RVP came to town. Nope, he'd get no games at all. The very idea of rotation makes Fergie sick, and so he will stick with only two forwards for every single game. He'll also play no games on the wing or anything like that... because Fergie doesn't like playing people in different positions. Fergie and RVP will effectively be ruining his whole career... the bastards.
Welbeck appeared in 40 games last season, I would place a decent wager that, if we signed RVP, he would appear in a similar number of games this season.
He hasn't changed his approach. That's fear talking.
Like I mentioned several times before, either a LB or a CM, and since it's obvious we've got money to spend (if need be) than why not spend it on a player who's more or less guaranteed to make a difference seeing as how we're thin in those areas and getting someone reliable (preferably an upgrade not just a gap-filler) would make a whole lot of difference compared to us signing a player whose position is already well stacked at the club.
I'm gonna be honest here and say I can't think of a better option for a LB than Baines simply because those who I think are better have either just been signed by a new club or are contracted to one long-term.
There's a lot of options for a CM though, and although those options change from year to year I think it's not that relevant when we look into the market as there's always someone to be found that could improve our squad, even if he costs a little more, I'd rather spend that than 20-25 million on a position we're "good" at. I'm well aware of the fact that not every player is attainable since this isn't FIFA, but I've no doubt in my mind that we could've signed atleast one already if the staff really gave it their all.
Oh and I'm not saying we're signing RvP JUST to shut up some people, I'm just saying that it plays a role in the signing, you can try to deny it, but to me it seems pretty clear. There's no doubt about him being a quality player but one could raise many questions as to why exactly he's being signed (supposedly).
Last season Danny Welbeck was our first choice centre forward, if Van Persie signs, he most assuredly won't be. Last season Danny Welbeck played nearly every game when he was fit, if Van Persie signs, he'll only play when the Dutchman is rested or injured or occasionally out wide. If you're retarded enough to think that this signing won't negatively impact Danny's opportunities, his outlook and his career, then, y'know, fair enough, but don't be so pathetic as to make such a ridiculous strawman. Of course he'll still get games, but the difference between being first choice and a sub is massive, even with our love for rotation.
.
Last season Danny Welbeck was our first choice centre forward, if Van Persie signs, he most assuredly won't be. Last season Danny Welbeck played nearly every game when he was fit, if Van Persie signs, he'll only play when the Dutchman is rested or injured or occasionally out wide.
You think signing Baines will make more of a difference than signing RvP?
Last season we lost the league on goal difference.
I think he's hinting that we might need more goals this season.What on earth has that got to do with what he said?
I think it gives us more of a positive outlook on the forecoming season, yes.
We desperately need cover for Evra, and Baines in all fairness not only looks like that, but might also be an improvement. Granted we could stick Evans, Brady or Blackett there in case of emergency but I don't like the look of that.
Our back 4 could be a lot more solid, and with the gradual improvement of De Gea and Vidič coming back we might again have the best defense in the world, and defense is what wins you silverware.
With RvP you obviously get a quality striker, but honestly I'd much rather we stick with Rooney, Kagawa, Welbeck and Hernandez up front, if that means the money can be better spent elsewhere than even better. We'd be getting a short term fix but if you look at the big picture it could hinder several player's progress. I know that you're going to point out our rotation policy, but even with that in mind you can't deny the fact that he'll see significantly less playing time this season (at the very least as a striker).
And besides what is with you and nitpicking on all of my posts? Never mind, whatever floats your boat, I don't really mind, just seems a bit weird that's all.
Last season Danny Welbeck was our first choice centre forward, if Van Persie signs, he most assuredly won't be. Last season Danny Welbeck played nearly every game when he was fit, if Van Persie signs, he'll only play when the Dutchman is rested or injured or occasionally out wide. If you're retarded enough to think that this signing won't negatively impact Danny's opportunities, his outlook and his career, then, y'know, fair enough, but don't be so pathetic as to make such a ridiculous strawman. Of course he'll still get games, but the difference between being first choice and a sub is massive, even with our love for rotation.
This transfer is almost entirely without precedent, you can argue about it impacting current players if you want, but the fact that it's a change of approach is an incontrovertible fact.
What on earth has that got to do with what he said?
That's not a news to me, I've been saying for a good 3 seasons now how Rooney lost that sudden bite and more often than not, watches out for his legs in 50/50 situations.
And if you're suggesting he would be a good options in the middle due to his presence then we are touching on the problem discussed in Januzaj's thread right now and would be well fecked. He can drop deep and play a diagonal, he can't though (and believe I too wanted him to play there once) play consistently and control games at high level week in week out in CM.
Last season Danny Welbeck was our first choice centre forward
Last season Danny Welbeck played nearly every game when he was fit
Last season we lost the league on goal difference.
See the link with signing the EPLs top scorer now?
van Persie (29)
Rooney (26)
Hernandez (24)
Welbeck (21)
Would be a great blend of youth and experience to have.
+
Last season Welbeck maybe got close to double figures give or take.
Last season RVP got 37 in all competitions and despite injuries, has a proven goalscoring record over many years
in january for 98.5 millionThe latest piece of official evidence.
It just get's better
The latest piece of official evidence.
It just get's better
The latest piece of official evidence.
It just get's better
Personally I think RvP will improve us more than Baines.
As I said the other day, if Fergie has sent Fabio out on loan he will have a plan regarding LB. We just don't know what it is yet.
Not nitpicking, promoting healthy debate.
He didnt play the preseason games and got only around 20 minutes against Cologne.The inner muppet in me is thinking the reason he's dropped out of the Holland squad is to finalise the transfer, agree terms and have a medical
He dropped out of the Holland squad?
I'm still shocked that there are people against this. It'll put us up there with City's attacking options, although with the only difference would be that City have players that will all expecting to play every game, where we, as Bryan pointed out, have a great mixture of youth and experience.
Hernandez will lose out more than most, but I believe he has the right sort of temperament to do deal with it, a bit like Olé. Also, like any youngster at the club, if he does his job well enough when called upon he will get playing time.
Welbeck will play almost as many games as Rooney and RVP, depending on injuries of course. I've said it before but with the level the game is now at and sheer volume of fixtures, we aren't gonna play the same two up top each game.
Formation played and the Kagawa signing also come into play, but Kagawa seems versatile enough to play elsewhere, and probably will on a lot of occasions.
We only have 3 wingers, one of which we could easily lose through injury. RVP, Welbeck and Rooney are all options there, albeit not ideal ones.
It will be a great buy, as both a show of intent to bounce back after missing out on the league and to improve us on the pitch.
Apparently so, was posted a couple of pages back.
Well, let's not turn it into Welbeck bashing. He is a good player with a bright and long future at United, but I can't see how being an understudy to Rooney and RvP would be a bad thing for his career and development.
He will be fine and will learn loads from playing with them. The alternative prospect of no RvP, Rooney injured and him having to carry the team goal-wise sounds more like break than make to me.