vs Southampton twice
He’s in everyone’s top 3 CBs ever to play for us. I don’t think that’s being underrated.VIdic remains underrated here when it comes to comparing him against our top CBs.
I said in comparison to the other two CBs in that criteria. He's being listed below Rio and Stam by most.He’s in everyone’s top 3 CBs ever to play for us. I don’t think that’s being underrated.
That’s hardly being underrated - All 3 were unreal. Rio and Stam were just a bit better.I said in comparison to the other two CBs in that criteria. He's being listed below Rio and Stam by most.
I disagree.That’s hardly being underrated - All 3 were unreal. Rio and Stam were just a bit better.
Even so, he’s not being underrated because people disagree with your opinion.I disagree.
Vidic was the best, most consistent and the most dominant, he's underrated now somehow because of a few games against Torres when Torres also destroyed Ferdinand if I remember correctly and Ferdinand was beaten by others during his career. Put Vidic on your team and the likes of Stoke were no problem at all. Ruined Drogba in the CL final so much that he got sent off.
Ferdinand was more graceful than Vidic but Vidic was a better all-round defender, less mistake-prone, more consistent. He also was decent on the ball, better than some people think, and more of a threat at set-pieces. Vidic is top 3 PL CBs in my opinion along with Van Dijk and Terry.
Stam was probably as good as Vidic but was here only 3 seasons, Vidic was like that but with extra seasons. If he stayed longer he could have been the best. Ferdinand was a brilliant defender too, just prefer Vidic.
VIdic remains underrated here when it comes to comparing him against our top CBs.
Thank you I had forgotten that , to be fair the second one wasn't really his fault.
Agreed.
Vidic's lack of pace means he's a level below the other two I'd suggest. Stam and Ferdinand would have been an amazing combo.
God having them together at both their peak would have been one of the best centre back partnerships of all time.
Stam was basically why we could go all out attack every game from 1998 to 2001 because we could afford to just leave him back.
He was like a one man defence.
Stam
Rio
Vidic
VVD is great, but they way teams play now with one or even no strikers helps the CB look better than he is.VVD for me is better. Is up there with Nesta. Rio was a bit so-so until Vidic arrived.
To be fair, Vidic's best ever run of form (first half of 08/09) largely happened with Evans next to him.A lot of you who have Vidic as #1. Just realize that there can't be a vidic without a Rio by your side. That's not to take away from Vidic but his brutal style needed a composed orchestrator.
What is your take on the McGrath who sobered up and gave it his all for Villa? His WC94 truly is the stuff of legend, just incredible.
Was McGrath's very best at United a patch on either of the aforementioned (Villa, WC94)?
I think the best analogy being that stam was an all rounder while rio and vidic were more specialized but complemented each other very very well and made up for each others deficiencies.
As someone already said if you had the choice of only one in your team, it would be stam.
Like I said it is like picking one of your children. Rio is one of my favourite United players but for me Stam and Vidic just had something that I can't explain they just had an aura of whoop ass about them.I don't know, Luis Garcia tells a story where Rio came through the back of him on his debut for Liverpool against United while screaming "Welcome to England, now get up!". Rio was tough, he did his fair share of kicking.
Your correct, Fergie made the wrong call on that one, we had some rough years before we got our hands on vidic and stamina still had a good few years in him, would go on to play in the ucl final after all.That’s a good way of putting it in terms of assessing them as players. Although, in a purely United context, I’d rank Rio and Vidic higher as they made a much bigger contribution over the years. Stam was only here a few seasons before he fell foul of SAF.
Vidic and Ferdinand at their peak was already one of the best centre back partnerships of all time.
Jaap Stam was the best CB I'd seen at United until Rio came along. McGrath did his best work for country and Villa, but would rank above them all for career peak, for me, but he's not part of this conversation. I'm curious as to how you rank the aforementioned three, and why you put them in the order you have. Incidentally, a combination of either Rio or Vidic with Stam would have been some sight to behold!
Mine:
1. Rio - Was the best defender in the world for a period of time (Nesta's injuries accepted) and was simply imperious at his best. Have him as a lock for United's all-time team.
2. Stam - Really enabled us to play with a high line. His reading of play, raw power and strength allied to his pace - once he picked up a head of steam - made him such an imposing figure. Perhaps the biggest shock sale of them all, despite talk of him being done for because of his injuries. Went on to be sublime in a strong Serie A, no bother.
3. Vidic - being ranked 'bottom' never looks good, but it's more testament to those above than Vidic being bad. Had less pace than the others, which is something he had to compensate for, which he did well with most of the time. An expert at dealing with any type of bruiser forward, but nimbler, fleet-footed ones were annoying fleas for him. I think his suscebility to that was greater than Rio's for donkeys, which does separate them, for me. But still an imperious CB and 3rd or 4th best of all-time for us, I think.
Where are you putting them, and why?