He was a team player who never tried to seek personal glory. He turned simplicity into an art form. - Walter Winterbottom
On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.Love the 4-4-2 attempt and it's a much better use of the Kaka-Modric teaming than @Enigma_87 used in the last draft imo. Cerezo-Modric seem like a great CM duo for the 4-4-2 here.
good luck @Physiocrat
On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
VJ is known for his admiration of a good 4-4-2On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
A strong, selfless player who had the stamina to spend 90 minutes at full stretch, Tommy was often at his best when drifting wide to the right, pulling defenders with him and interchanging positions with Johnny Berry. Such a ploy produced Johnny's unforgettable winner against Atletico Bilbao in the quarter-final of the 1956/57 European Cup.
Can't get my head around both teams. Nestor Rossi - Gerson would have been a fantastic duo, but how will Hassler add to the dynamic. I don't think Gerson is good in this role here. Even in 70, he had Rivellino drifting in and Pele dropping back ahead of him in the middle.
Not sure on Kaka's role here too. With just 1 striker, Kaka will be facing Rossi directly and how effective will that be?
To be fair, I'd rather not indulge in this type of a comparison. Kanchelkis may have given Maldini some problems, but it wasn't indicative of his overall stature (just like Nani being a problem for Cole didn't stop the latter from taming Ronaldo on several occasions, or Evra being molested by freaking Lennon shouldn't be used as a broader argument) - which is something we have alluded to in the writeup. What Kanchelkis did or didn't do to Maldini in some isolated match shouldn't have a bearing here, in terms of projection.How good is Marinho defensively? From what I've seen he's handy going forward but Kanchelskis was a really handful at his peak and terrorised even Maldini.
Conversely, Kaltz was a better defender than Evra, who'll be up against Julinho - one of the greatest wingers in football history (who also had good workrate up and down the flank, might I add), apart from Kaltz himself when he bombs up, and Häßler - who will complete the triangle on the right - given his free role. Fair to say, Patrice might have more to worry about here, than his counterpart on the other end.Also Katlz is quality but having a trio of Kaka, Zagallo and Evra in the left and inside left channel. This would be a severe task for anyone.
Didn't specify that KHF will gobble Taylor - the key word was 'favorable' - for our team in a 1v1 matchup sense. KHF was the top, top European stopper at his peak - who was regularly voted German defender of the Year, and was voted in two successive EURO All-Star teams from the early to mid '80s (don't think many will argue with that), and I'd daresay he's even a tad overqualified for the role given that he tasked with marking the likes of Platini on the international stage.Also Forster won't just gobble up Taylor.
It's fairly simple to be honest - Rossi breaks down plays, and sets things up for Gérson on a platter, and Häßler is the third wheel who opens up the field with his dynamic style of play, ventures forward, and even chips in with his extensive workrate. Rossi and Gérson would've been excellent from a qualitative sense, but Häßler brings invaluable effervescence to that part of the pitch. In some ways, because of his multi functionality - Häßler can act a link from Gérson to Riva; and also - Orsi operated on both - the inside and outside channels - so in a positional sense, his role isn't too different from Rivelino, though admittedly he was more of a dribbler than a playmaker like Rivelino. The overarching point is that given that these are fantasy drafts, we should be allowed certain flexibilities based on skillset, rather than regurgitating historical setups - because that wouldn't be fun, at all.Nestor Rossi - Gerson would have been a fantastic duo, but how will Hassler add to the dynamic. I don't think Gerson is good in this role here. Even in 70, he had Rivellino drifting in and Pele dropping back ahead of him in the middle.
That he's slightly more cautious than Marinho in his defensive duties. We wanted to relay this description in graphic form (without fudging up his overall attacking output on the other end on the pitch):What does the backwards arrow on Kaltz is supposed to represent? @Šjor Bepo @Invictus
Minor functional difference, but we thought it merited an extra arrow just to make thing clear.Manfred Kaltz - Rightback - Support
Marinho Chagas - Left Wingback - Support
Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.That he's slightly more cautious than Marinho in his defensive duties. We wanted to relay this description in graphic form (without fudging up his overall attacking output on the other end on the pitch):
Minor functional difference, but we thought it merited an extra arrow just to make thing clear.
Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.
Don't know much about Chagas - is he worth it? You're essentially shifting attacking balance to the left (I hope that this thought is understandable, my English is particularly poor today)
Just to echo Bepo's thoughts - They're both attacking, we aren't shackling Kaltz down or anything. But, since Kaltz was the better defender of the two, we thought we'd signify that, and acknowledge the fact that he'll be up against a good wide player in Zagallo. Plus, Marinho might be a smaller name, but very important for the attacking balance of the left flank - especially given Neville's defensive function, and also - in terms of being a bridge to Gérson because he attacked with his right foot and came into the inside channels quite frequently:Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.
Don't know much about Chagas - is he worth it? You're essentially shifting attacking balance to the left (I hope that this thought is understandable, my English is particularly poor today)
To be fair, I'd rather not indulge in this type of a comparison. Kanchelkis may have given Maldini some problems, but it wasn't indicative of his overall stature (just like Nani being a problem for Cole didn't stop the latter from taming Ronaldo on several occasions, or Evra being molested by freaking Lennon shouldn't be used as a broader argument) - which is something we have alluded to in the writeup. What Kanchelkis did or didn't do to Maldini in some isolated match shouldn't have a bearing here, in terms of projection.
Conversely, Kaltz was a better defender than Evra, who'll be up against Julinho - one of the greatest wingers in football history (who also had good workrate up and down the flank, might I add), apart from Kaltz himself when he bombs up, and Häßler - who will complete the triangle on the right - given his free role. Fair to say, Patrice might have more to worry about here, than his counterpart on the other end.
Didn't specify that KHF will gobble Taylor - the key word was 'favorable' - for our team in a 1v1 matchup sense. KHF was the top, top European stopper at his peak - who was regularly voted German defender of the Year, and was voted in two successive EURO All-Star teams from the early to mid '80s (don't think many will argue with that), and I'd daresay he's even a tad overqualified for the role given that he tasked with marking the likes of Platini on the international stage.
Not sure on Kaka's role here too. With just 1 striker, Kaka will be facing Rossi directly and how effective will that be?
I think Zagallo will have a work load on the left both offensively and defensively with Hassler running into that space and Julinho there as well, restricting a bit his effect centrally.You are forgetting Zagallo. He was the player that made Pele, Didi and Garrincha work in the Brazil '58 team. He also played more of a centralish role in '62 so will provide a lot of aid in midfield.
Also given the fact Sjor is playing quite vertically I don't expect him to have much more possesion than me, so the 3 vs 2 won't be a huge issue.
Also I think Evra's defensive ability is underated because he got lazy towards his Utd career and didn't run back much and was out of position. In his younger days this positional issue simply did not exist since he got back.
@Physiocrat Who is that Taylor guy, where do you think he stands in football all time history, what's his playstyle and what exactly will he bring to your team beside goals? (sorry I'm not all that versed in MUFC history)
Hard to deny that.VJ is known for his admiration of a good 4-4-2
What I mean is that I believe Modric-Cerezo as a midfield duo with Kaka in a 4-4-1-1 with the duo as the CM pair, is better use of Modric and Kaka tbf than in the diamond you had(can't seem to remember who were the other two). Modric in a 4-4-2 with a strong defensive CM like Cerezo could be excellent, Modric has the abilities to single-handedly dominate midfields, and with Kaka linking up with him in the final third and the good wing players, I can see him thriving. The problem with the 4-4-2 diamond was the lack of space Modric had to operate in central areas and the big defensive duty you had for him - there would be a huge difference between the movement Kaka will do behind a single striker or behind two strikers, and the way I see it Modric's natural movements will work better with Kaka when he's in a more advanced role.On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
To be fair I don't think 3-5-2(or 5-3-2 for that matter), 4-3-3 or 4-4-2(4-4-1-1) would make a difference for Modric. With two attacking full backs/wing backs in 4-3-3/5-3-2 you pretty much have the same options for him on the wing as you would with a conventional 4-4-2 especially with the ball.Hard to deny that.
What I mean is that I believe Modric-Cerezo as a midfield duo with Kaka in a 4-4-1-1 with the duo as the CM pair, is better use of Modric and Kaka tbf than in the diamond you had(can't seem to remember who were the other two). Modric in a 4-4-2 with a strong defensive CM like Cerezo could be excellent, Modric has the abilities to single-handedly dominate midfields, and with Kaka linking up with him in the final third and the good wing players, I can see him thriving. The problem with the 4-4-2 diamond was the lack of space Modric had to operate in central areas and the big defensive duty you had for him - there would be a huge difference between the movement Kaka will do behind a single striker or behind two strikers, and the way I see it Modric's natural movements will work better with Kaka when he's in a more advanced role.
Anyway, I think you had a great team mate just not the best use of Modric, but that's just the annoying Modric fanboy speaking
@Physiocrat Who is that Taylor guy, where do you think he stands in football all time history, what's his playstyle and what exactly will he bring to your team beside goals? (sorry I'm not all that versed in MUFC history)
Yeah of course, no team was perfect, but I still think that if you wanted the best of either of Modric or Kaka you'd be better off with someone like Hierro as DM, Davids as LCM, B2B as RCM(Seedorf or anyone in that style). At the beginning, and correct me if I'm mistaken, you had a DM who wasn't a creative type in the Pirlo vibe, and the LCM was Schneider who was also pretty adventurous, with Modric & Kaka. That is very far off getting the best of either. The Hierro-Davids-Modric-Kaka theme yeah it works for Kaka very well, but not as well for Modric who isn't the type for a diamond.Sure in the last draft it needed some tuning up until the final, but at the end Hierro as DM, Davids as LCM, Modric as RCM and Kaka as AM behind 2 strikers in Villa/Sheva and 2 attacking full backs in Cafu/Alaba makes it as optimal as you can get for Kaka to shine
Our CF during the Busby Babes era. Was killed in Munich. Has a good reputation of being a complete CF. Hard to rate him in an all time context. Based on minimal stuff I know about him, I'd put him as a traditional CF, presence in box, hold up and able to bring others into play.
He was a target man style player who was excellent in the air but was also pretty mobile, he could drift left and right and also link up play very well, he had a good short pass on him. For a more modern comparison he's similar to Christian Vieri. Unfortunately the only good lot of footage which gives an all rounf view is the '57 FA Cup Final vs Villa.
I think too much is being made of the 2 vs 3 in midfield again especially since it's only really Hassler who will provide much energy in there. Modric and Cerezo are both complete mobile midfielders, along with Zagallo helping out they will have space to work.
He can pick out Kaka in the inside left channel who can use his exceptional acceleration to glide past Wright/ Forster (neither of whom were the quickest). Lest we forget how good Kaka was at Milan see this: his dribbling from deepish positions is exactly what I'm asking of him during attacks.
In addition if Modric glides the ball inside the full-back Kanchelskis can really cause problems:
I really think the pace of Kanchelskis (when he cuts in) and Kaka could be a real problem for his two CBs and DM.
Well, it's not a criticism, just stating the fact here)Hard to deny that
Sjor and Invictus look pretty tidy as well: my only question would be to what extent will that very rigorous central defensive trio have the pace to deal with a bursting Kaka? I can see how they match up well to Tommy, but Kaka's athleticism would be a different beast entirely.
I think its being made to little, perspectives eh?
They are against 3 top class midfielders that suit each other very well in our opinion. Zagallo will be occupied with ever present Kaltz so if he goes inside Kaltz will have time and space to volchure forwards and send in his famous bananenflanken for Riva who is fantastic in the air.
Another even match-up. It's hard to pick a winner here. Tactically both look sound. I've got no issues with Physio's 4-4-1-1: it's solid, sensible with wide players used to operating in that kind of set-up and central players suited to holding positionally rather than careering forward. Sjor and Invictus look pretty tidy as well: my only question would be to what extent will that very rigorous central defensive trio have the pace to deal with a bursting Kaka? I can see how they match up well to Tommy, but Kaka's athleticism would be a different beast entirely.
from our OP said:Kaká possesses the pace to rip apart any defensive midfielder in this pool, so marking him in man would admittedly be futile. The plan is to squeeze the pitch as much possible in the middle, and clog up the area - in a way that limits time and space on the ball for him. Rossi was a legendary destroyer, and he will form a bank in front of Kaká, with two defensive juggernauts acting as the next level of containment.
Kaka will be in congested midfield area marked mainly by Rossi and if and when he cuts loose and escapes the shackles of our midfield he will have the great Billy Wright sweeping behind.
"Strength, temperament, management, skill, presence, transmission, influence.Everything had Pipo. It is permanent. What no discussion. The sum of all attributes. Of all shades. And incorruptible fidelity to the well played ball. And an insult to the guy who hits it up, which takes it out long and far, which does not make it roll on the floor. " This was defined in 1965 Figure in a note that was titled Now they call No. 5, before they said Pipo. Rossi had all that and more, because it was a giant in an age of giants a central midfielder centrojás or old school with its panoramic vision to move ahead and drew revenue from its good punch.