red4ever 79
New Member
Nah Andy Goram takes that crownAlways thought Carroll was out worst "regular" keeper... And by a distance too.
Nah Andy Goram takes that crownAlways thought Carroll was out worst "regular" keeper... And by a distance too.
We muddled around for years until VDS. Never rated Barthez personally
He played twice for United.Nah Andy Goram takes that crown
yeah totally agree. howard was clearly not a elite level talented keeper, but after barthez and the chance that absolutely anything could happen, i remember really liking howard ! and then vds I remember being a teenager and thinking... oh this is what a goalkeeper should be...I never trusted Barthez when he played for us. Always seemed like he could make a mistake or do something stupid at any moment.
I liked Tim Howard more than him, but it's a similar sort of story there, too. Promising in lots of ways, but have the ability to make mistakes and that makes the rest of the team nervous. When you don't fully trust a goalkeeper, that lack of confidence then drips into other areas of the team. It has a ripple effect.
VDS was such a brilliant keeper post-Schmeichel. Exactly what we needed and he just looked mentally strong and solid. When he came in, you just knew that the position had finally been sorted and nailed down. Top class keeper. Wish we had got him years earlier.
Yeah, that's probably why it goes more unnoticed. Remember reading Keane's book and he was gutted that we didn't improve the squad from a position of strength after winning the treble.
Nah Andy Goram takes that crown
He only played twice for us...Wouldn't call that regular, same with Taibi.
Carroll played for us 72 times... Which is roughly 72 times too many
I forgot all about Taibi. What a debut he had.He only played twice for us...Wouldn't call that regular, same with Taibi.
Carroll played for us 72 times... Which is roughly 72 times too many
I seem to remember him and silvestre having the games of their lives at AnfieldI forgot all about Taibi. What a debut he had.
I forgot all about Taibi. What a debut he had.
Your original post said "Our attack literally struggled to get into space with the ball" and "our team play struggled". That's simply not true in any way or form. We scored more goals, got more points, won more games than in 1998/99 - saying that our . We lost our heads against Real Madrid at Old Trafford even though that was a team that we really should have beaten. But it certainly wasn't because we missed Schmeichel's goalkicks.
Yeah, Bosnich on the look of it was a lot more natural choice to than Schmeichel had been, one coming from Brøndby in the semi-professional Danish league and the other being one of the PL’s most touted goalkeepers, even on surface seeming like he had the confidence needed to play for United. Sir Alex was always a sucker for a good deal, and Bozzo seemed as good a deal as Big Pete, or better. Difference was one exploded and the other imploded.
One crucial element was, though, I think even the gaffer underestimated how central Schmeichels goal kicks and throws were for our aggressive and fast football playing on the break. Our attack literally struggled to get into space with the ball because they were used to Schmeichel distributing precisely to well within their half in half a second. As a result, the team play struggled, and I think Bosnich must have noticed that frustration more than even Taibi were affected by his blunders.
It was a question of not doing enough homework, taking a Cantona-like punt, but it didn’t fly.
I just remember him wearing pants. I was never a fan of keepers wearing jogging bottoms.And STILL cost us a goal.
I think everyone in the world would at that point in time have said VDS is the sure bet, whereas Bosnich wasn't. But I can't remember if we were linked to others.
That's extraordinary. So a cost-saving exercise in effect, behind the manager's back, after delivering 3 trophies. Criminal.
It wasn't extraordinary back then Edwards was at it all the time. In 1998 Ferguson wanted Kluivert and Yorke, Edwards dilly dallied on moves for both because he on the advice of Brian Kidd wanted to sign John Hartson instead.
We got Yorke in 98 though?
Edwards has a different version though:
Bearing in mind 15m was a world record fee only two years before, 15million wasn't exactly buttons back then.
Add in Yorke like you mention and almost 30m in one summer in 98 was huge
Yeah, you're right about 15m not being a paltry sum. Still, it was quite ridiculous for a big club like United to be able to sign a player (Stam) for a world record fee for a defender, add a winger for not a huge sum and not have anything at all for another player. And to think Fergie wanted two strikers rather than one.
And people think Ole's got it rough beacuse he could only sign three players for huge money in the last two transfer windows.
Yeah, a decent keeper overrated, I assume partly because he may have had a good season or two elsewhere (too young to know) and partly because he was somewhat extravagant.We muddled around for years until VDS. Never rated Barthez personally
I seem to recall we were either linked with Antti Niemi and Kasey Keller from Leicester, both would of made excellent replacements than Bosnich
It's all in Fergie's book... he claims he didn't wanted him and had changed his mind on Bosnich (wanted Van der Sar) but a deal was already done/too late to back out.Couldn't understand it then and now, looking back, it seems to be on a similar level of consciousness to think Moyes could take over from SAF. What on earth were we thinking having just won the treble and getting in Mark Bosnich on a free from Villa?
It took us 6 years to find a suitable GK following that catastrophe...
Who recommended him? Were we not linked with actual top class keepers at the time? Must have been a downer in the dressing room, high on winning the treble and you see your club replace Schmeichel with the Villa keeper. Who then turned out to have a career mired in personal issues and was labelled a terrible professional by SAF. And also, a shite keeper.
it must have felt so bad for the players to see Schmeichel replaced by this dud. And later on Bosnich had some serious drug addiction issues, right?Scholes has his say.
“I go back to the goalkeepers, when you had to try and replace Peter Schmeichel, which is always going to be difficult,” said Scholes.
“We had a few [bad signings].
“I was thinking [Massimo] Taibi, Mark Bosnich.
“I thought he was a good keeper at Villa, Mark. He came to us, he was so unprofessional.
“Honestly, it was ridiculous.
“In shooting practice, you normally have like 15, 20 shots.
“After three shots, he’s knackered, ‘oh no, get someone else in’.
“I never realised, he couldn’t kick a football. I’ve never seen anything like it.
“We played Everton away in first game of the season, and none of us picked up on it, he couldn’t reach the halfway line.
“There was no wind, it was a perfect day. But when you look at his feet, size 14s, honestly he was just kicking the floor all the time, big flippers.
Intercontinental Cup. Different thing to the World Club Championship, where we failed to make it out of the group stage.Bosnich was terrible. Except for one game in the Pan-Galatic Universal World Club Championship Cup Final Trophy, or whatever the feck it was called that week. It was against Palmeiras, we won 1-0 and he had an absolute blinder.
I seem to remember him having a decent game in a 0-0 away to Real Madrid once as well. But that's literally it. The lazy, fat bastard.
Going from Schmeichel to....that.
It's almost fitting depiction of more recent United squads.“After three shots, he’s knackered, ‘oh no, get someone else in’.
“I never realised, he couldn’t kick a football. I’ve never seen anything like it.
To be fair to VDS admitted he regreted not going to United sooner. He thinks he'd have won more CL's if he'd done so and I'd tend to agree
No Valencia wasn’t a great player at any time.You could also say 'Replacing Cristiano Ronaldo with Antonio Valencia' (though Valencia was a great player in his first few years for us, we needed far more).
Bosnich was strange cause at the time we weren't as tight on things in the market, were we?