Sweet Square
ˈkämyənəst
It's very impressive but completely useless.even visually!
"this 5 second shot in an episode from the 1991 is a reuse of a shot from a movie from 1979"
This video is 30 minutes long
It's very impressive but completely useless.even visually!
"this 5 second shot in an episode from the 1991 is a reuse of a shot from a movie from 1979"
I've recently started watching more of these lot after having only seen the Plinkett prequel reviews a good few years ago due to getting more into Star Trek, and I like them.
I've been watching their Picard reviews and it's both sad and funny. Sad because of what it seems Star Trek has become which you can tell hurts them, but funny because, well, they're funny!
Also saw that, because The Last Jedi killed his hope, and The Rise of Skywalker was so bad, he didn't even feel the need to do a Plinkett review of it.
I knowThe zoom in's on Wil Wheaton face.....oh my gaaawwwwwwwd the cringe.
RLM's the best thing since birth of Rich Evans.Is it weird that Redletter media is my favourite thing to watch?
The cuts to Wil Wheaton are killing me
Is it weird that Redletter media is my favourite thing to watch?
No. They are great. The banter between Mike and Rich is some of the best comedy on youtube.Is it weird that Redletter media is my favourite thing to watch?
Mike and Rich finally doing a TNG quiz. Everything after the 33 minute mark approximately I couldn’t stop laughing.
Same! I haven't watched more than 10min of any of the star trek shows combined but have watched most of their episodes talking about them.How have I never seen this thread before? I love Red Letter Media. If I had to decide between watching RLM for the rest of my life or anything on Netflix/HBO/Prime, I'd choose RLM. I couldn't care less about Star Trek but I can listen to those guys talk about it for hours
Aww. Happy Pride Month!Also
Interesting video
Pretty much. Nice idea but impossible to happen.Mike's idea of reviving cinemas sounds sound pretty good. It'll never happen though.
See it going the same way in one way or another. I feel like the cultural (or propaganda) value of having more or less everyone in the world watching your movies is probably pretty valuable. So i expect they'll survive in one way or another.Pretty much. Nice idea but impossible to happen.
The CEO who are making money from films don’t care about films although I think Jay is correct in that the general public also don’t care about films. Which isn’t a bad thing or a value judgment more that there’s other types of media which takes up people time.
The answer imo is to copy the Soviets and have government funding projects. Like the Scorsese or Lynch should be given government money to make films regardless of how many people watch their work.
Possibly yeah. It would be interesting if we got the true numbers from streaming platforms to see what people are really watching. Is it new movies or is it endless rewatches of friends and the shawshank redemption.Think cinema's are dead because people just prefer watching movies elsewhere. I feel like the movie thread on here is probably one of the more active threads on the site so i dont really think the general public dont care about movies so much as dont care for the cinema.
Pretty much. Nice idea but impossible to happen.
The CEO who are making money from films don’t care about films although I think Jay is correct in that the general public also don’t care about films. Which isn’t a bad thing or a value judgment more that there’s other types of media which takes up people time.
The answer imo is to copy the Soviets and have government funding projects. Like the Scorsese or Lynch should be given government money to make films regardless of how many people watch their work.
In case you'd lost track of the sheer amount of nonsense being released!