Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 52,589
And that would naturally lead to a first Ballon D’or.Would love to see Ronnie win the World Cup
And that would naturally lead to a first Ballon D’or.Would love to see Ronnie win the World Cup
Only in the new Saudi tourney.And that would naturally lead to a first Ballon D’or.
You could get a John Parris for that price. If you’re going to spend that much on a cue, I’d get some in person advice and get it weighted and tailored to you. A £1000 cue that is the wrong size, weight and balance for you is as good as a £40 Jimmy White cue from sports direct. If you get it from a reputed cue maker or reseller, they should have a table for you to play and get a feel for it. Also don’t just go by “this feels right”, listen to their advice - they might suggest you go slightly heavier or lighter depending how you cue the ball and once you get used to it you’ll understand why they suggested it.Looking for a bit of advice. I really want a proper cue which I can play snooker and English 8 ball with.
Is there much of a difference between snooker cue’s and English pool cue’s?
I play pool quite a lot, snooker every now and again but I really like the idea of having a top of the range cue to keep for years.
Budget would be £500-600
Looking for a bit of advice. I really want a proper cue which I can play snooker and English 8 ball with.
Is there much of a difference between snooker cue’s and English pool cue’s?
I play pool quite a lot, snooker every now and again but I really like the idea of having a top of the range cue to keep for years.
Budget would be £500-600
Weight balance is different, and also the tip diameter, although I’m no expert. I believe pool balls are also heavier so the pool cue is slightly heavier duty.
I think the best snooker cues are in 3-4 sections too, and pool tend to be 2. Been a very very long time since I looked at cues properly, probably 20yrs now, so I’m likely miles out of date.![]()
You could get a John Parris for that price. If you’re going to spend that much on a cue, I’d get some in person advice and get it weighted and tailored to you. A £1000 cue that is the wrong size, weight and balance for you is as good as a £40 Jimmy White cue from sports direct. If you get it from a reputed cue maker or reseller, they should have a table for you to play and get a feel for it. Also don’t just go by “this feels right”, listen to their advice - they might suggest you go slightly heavier or lighter depending how you cue the ball and once you get used to it you’ll understand why they suggested it.
You could get a John Parris for that price. If you’re going to spend that much on a cue, I’d get some in person advice and get it weighted and tailored to you. A £1000 cue that is the wrong size, weight and balance for you is as good as a £40 Jimmy White cue from sports direct. If you get it from a reputed cue maker or reseller, they should have a table for you to play and get a feel for it. Also don’t just go by “this feels right”, listen to their advice - they might suggest you go slightly heavier or lighter depending how you cue the ball and once you get used to it you’ll understand why they suggested it.
@ChrisNelson will be along any moment to commend Ronnie’s performance.
Resistance is futile. There can be only Ron.What a miserable weekend of watching yet more players bottle their matches against Ronnie.
Judd... that black along the cushionit's a very depressing time for me as a fan of pretty much everyone but him!
I’ve heard a few of the pros and ex-pros talk about him as a “scholar of the game” and a “historian”. I don’t think we ever see that on camera but it’s clear that behind the scenes or in a more casual setting he’s shown just how much he studies the game. He’s a nerd basically but doesn’t like people to know.I feel like one of the underrated aspects of the current iteration of O’Sullivan is how fierce a competitor he is now. Back in the day there was always the risk that he’d get the better of himself when behind and chuck it in. Obviously he still has the odd moment of petulance but he’s amazing at staying the course and reeling off 4-5 frames to put massive pressure on opponents. He did it to Trump yesterday and Carter a week before. I had the good fortune of seeing him do it to Neil Robertson at the 2021 World Grand Prix final where someone shouted to him ‘you can try you know’ when he was 7-5 down.
I remember watching Ronnie do an Instagram live with Hendry during Covid and he spoke about how he let Selby slow him down in the World Championship final that he lost and that he’d never let it happen again if he got into a similar situation with Selby. He did exactly as he promised in their semi final a few months later. It’s always stuck with me because you never really get an insight into how much O’Sullivan thinks about the game, pundits reduce him to a genius and he never really gets into specifics about the game because he’s always misdirecting and taking pressure off himself.
Agree with you here. In fact, I think it's made him even better and more dangerous. After going down 4-0 in the morning session and playing terribly I thought it would be over and I feel if that was the old Ronnie it would have been over.I always want Trump to win (unless he's playing Lisowksi), so was disappointed to see how he choked it once Ronnie stepped it up a level - though neither came close to their top level at any stage of the Final.
Re: O'Sullivan. What I think he's done really well to keep his game, and mind, sharp at almost 50 is seemingly 'bottle' all the madness of his flawed genius and let it nowadays only come out in his interviews. That's how it seems to me anyway.
He always seemed the kind who'd blow up early, like so many 'flawed geniuses'. Instead, he seems to have got a real handle on his game, lifestyle, mental situation, etc - and seems to use his interviews to let all the 'demons' out by saying all kinds of pretty ludicrous stuff really, that people should just mostly see as entertaining rubbish.
I guess the only problem with that is that people put the same kind of pressure on him as footballers, in the whole 'you're a role model, you need to use the platform to influence kids, make positive statements, etc'. So, therefore, people take seriously the silly, mostly disingenuous stuff he says and it gets blown up as if it's a hugely significant statement rather than just Ronnie letting off some steam and amusing himself in his compulsory interviews.
I always want Trump to win (unless he's playing Lisowksi), so was disappointed to see how he choked it once Ronnie stepped it up a level - though neither came close to their top level at any stage of the Final.
Re: O'Sullivan. What I think he's done really well to keep his game, and mind, sharp at almost 50 is seemingly 'bottle' all the madness of his flawed genius and let it nowadays only come out in his interviews. That's how it seems to me anyway.
He always seemed the kind who'd blow up early, like so many 'flawed geniuses'. Instead, he seems to have got a real handle on his game, lifestyle, mental situation, etc - and seems to use his interviews to let all the 'demons' out by saying all kinds of pretty ludicrous stuff really, that people should just mostly see as entertaining rubbish.
I guess the only problem with that is that people put the same kind of pressure on him as footballers, in the whole 'you're a role model, you need to use the platform to influence kids, make positive statements, etc'. So, therefore, people take seriously the silly, mostly disingenuous stuff he says and it gets blown up as if it's a hugely significant statement rather than just Ronnie letting off some steam and amusing himself in his compulsory interviews.
He blitzed Trump in the worlds and this week and I’m 100 percent convinced he leaves Judd long pots on that he doesn’t do when Judd isn’t struggling but it never seems to be brought up. Trump just can’t turn them down cause that’s his game and it let’s Ronnie in time and time again. It’s very mid 90s tactics on display when it was a mortal sin to keep going for those shots so that’s what the clever dicks tried to leave and bait players into going for them.I feel like one of the underrated aspects of the current iteration of O’Sullivan is how fierce a competitor he is now. Back in the day there was always the risk that he’d get the better of himself when behind and chuck it in. Obviously he still has the odd moment of petulance but he’s amazing at staying the course and reeling off 4-5 frames to put massive pressure on opponents. He did it to Trump yesterday and Carter a week before. I had the good fortune of seeing him do it to Neil Robertson at the 2021 World Grand Prix final where someone shouted to him ‘you can try you know’ when he was 7-5 down.
I remember watching Ronnie do an Instagram live with Hendry during Covid and he spoke about how he let Selby slow him down in the World Championship final that he lost and that he’d never let it happen again if he got into a similar situation with Selby. He did exactly as he promised in their semi final a few months later. It’s always stuck with me because you never really get an insight into how much O’Sullivan thinks about the game, pundits reduce him to a genius and he never really gets into specifics about the game because he’s always misdirecting and taking pressure off himself.
I always want Trump to win (unless he's playing Lisowksi), so was disappointed to see how he choked it once Ronnie stepped it up a level - though neither came close to their top level at any stage of the Final.
Re: O'Sullivan. What I think he's done really well to keep his game, and mind, sharp at almost 50 is seemingly 'bottle' all the madness of his flawed genius and let it nowadays only come out in his interviews. That's how it seems to me anyway.
He always seemed the kind who'd blow up early, like so many 'flawed geniuses'. Instead, he seems to have got a real handle on his game, lifestyle, mental situation, etc - and seems to use his interviews to let all the 'demons' out by saying all kinds of pretty ludicrous stuff really, that people should just mostly see as entertaining rubbish.
I guess the only problem with that is that people put the same kind of pressure on him as footballers, in the whole 'you're a role model, you need to use the platform to influence kids, make positive statements, etc'. So, therefore, people take seriously the silly, mostly disingenuous stuff he says and it gets blown up as if it's a hugely significant statement rather than just Ronnie letting off some steam and amusing himself in his compulsory interviews.
There was one safety shot that Ronnie played in the evening session (I forget the frame) but it was a straight forward safety shot to play and get the cue ball in behind the colours but Ronnie played it to the right of the colours and left a long pot on to the bottom right pocket. The commentators called it a pretty poor safety but I'm 99% sure that Ronnie purposely left it there thinking Trump would miss. Trump did miss....He blitzed Trump in the worlds and this week and I’m 100 percent convinced he leaves Judd long pots on that he doesn’t do when Judd isn’t struggling but it never seems to be brought up. Trump just can’t turn them down cause that’s his game and it let’s Ronnie in time and time again. It’s very mid 90s tactics on display when it was a mortal sin to keep going for those shots so that’s what the clever dicks tried to leave and bait players into going for them.
Thats the problem I have with snooker commentary, everything is grouped together as safety play, long pot success etc but the little nuances never seem to be fully explored. Maybe that’s for the general public and their ease of understanding or something
How good are you?Looking for a bit of advice. I really want a proper cue which I can play snooker and English 8 ball with.
Is there much of a difference between snooker cue’s and English pool cue’s?
I play pool quite a lot, snooker every now and again but I really like the idea of having a top of the range cue to keep for years.
Budget would be £500-600
How good are you?
If you are playing in tournaments where money is involved and you think an expensive cue can pay for itself then I think it would be worth the outlay but if not I would not be spending 600 quid on a cue.Average at snooker but I’d say well above average at English pool.
It’s also something I’d like to keep, I probably wouldn’t buy a new cue for 10+years maybe never.
People spend £200 on football boots every season. £600 on a cue that could last 20-30 years if looked after is reasonable.If you are playing in tournaments where money is involved and you think an expensive cue can pay for itself then I think it would be worth the outlay but if not I would not be spending 600 quid on a cue.
True, but someone could play just as well with a cheaper cue and do not need to go down the Parris type route unless they are a serious player.People spend £200 on football boots every season. £600 on a cue that could last 20-30 years if looked after is reasonable.
You could and there is probably a level where you will begin to see a difference however I would argue that the process of having a bespoke cue weighted, balanced and tailored to your specifications and action would help anyone capable of stringing a few pots together and that’s probably the most valuable thing you’re paying for.True, but someone could play just as well with a cheaper cue and do not need to go down the Parris type route unless they are a serious player.
I think between you and I we have provided a few good options for the original poster.You could and there is probably a level where you will begin to see a difference however I would argue that the process of having a bespoke cue weighted, balanced and tailored to your specifications and action would help anyone capable of stringing a few pots together and that’s probably the most valuable thing you’re paying for.
By the same logic though, given a good range of £50-£100 cues of varying weights, lengths and ferrule sizes to trial you’d probably find a queue that is as appropriate for you as any tailored £600 cue.
True, but someone could play just as well with a cheaper cue and do not need to go down the Parris type route unless they are a serious player.
I am sure there are but I live in the Southern Hemisphere so would not be of any great help.It’s more the craftsmanship I’m after. Something I can hopefully pass down in the family at some point.
Obviously the performance is important too, but I just think a great cue is something that would last for years.
I should have mentioned that this was also a 30th birthday present from my partner. She said she would spend £500 and really I don’t need for anything, so I thought a proper pool/snooker cue would be nice seeing as we both love to play pool.
Are there any other great cue makers out there apart from Parris? I’m just thinking if I have to wait years for my cue it might ruin the enjoyment out of it