Redcafe Snooker

I think Ronnie's a bit of a nob.
What he said about all the up and coming players being shit must have devastated a few of them as im sure some of them idolise him.

I hope Selby dicks him to be honest and he is more than capable of doing so because ronnie hates playing against him.

If they let it effect their progress, they will prove him right.
 
I experimented with a few chalks last year, settled on Predator 1080 for American Pool with a Kaumi Clear super soft tip. For Snooker and UK pool I still don’t think you can beat a Blue Diamond with green triangle chalk.

The predator chalk is far too fine and almost pasty for snooker and pool and makes a complete mess of the table and balls
 
Crazy this. Do they ever change the balls mid session?
Changing the white isn’t that uncommon. A slightly lighter or heavier white than normal massively affects positional play. Changing a full set of balls due to kicks is pretty rare though
 
It was Steve Davis who came up with Anthony McGill’s nickname “Licensed to Thrill” ... :lol:

Never in the history of nicknames has there ever been one less deserving
 
Can sense how frustrated Ronnie is. If he doesn't win this match feels like he may throw a wobbly like never seen before. Could even see him retiring in the heat of the moment.
 
This is what happens when you don't put Selby away when he plays badly. Ronnie playing trash today and Selby is destroying him
 
It's so weird watching this though , every time Ronnie steps up to the table irrespective of where the balls are he just plays an aggressive shot within 20 seconds while Selby is exactly the opposite
 
It's so weird watching this though , every time Ronnie steps up to the table irrespective of where the balls are he just plays an aggressive shot within 20 seconds while Selby is exactly the opposite

To be fair, I think Ronnie getting bored and trying to pot everything was about what people were expecting at least at some point in this match.
 
Wait there - McGill hasn't scored a single century the whole (main) tournament. Crazy stat in the modern game that.
 
Wait there - McGill hasn't scored a single century the whole (main) tournament. Crazy stat in the modern game that.
wonder if that’s the first time it’s ever happened ...though not surprised, he’s bloody painful to watch
 
Is it just me or does it seem like there are less centuries overall nowadays than say 5-10 years ago? I feel like the standard of snooker as a whole in the big tournaments has dropped a fair bit in that time but I could be wrong.
 
Is it just me or does it seem like there are less centuries overall nowadays than say 5-10 years ago? I feel like the standard of snooker as a whole in the big tournaments has dropped a fair bit in that time but I could be wrong.
It is just the McGill effect... The record number of centuries at the Crucible was last year, I think.
 
Is it just me or does it seem like there are less centuries overall nowadays than say 5-10 years ago? I feel like the standard of snooker as a whole in the big tournaments has dropped a fair bit in that time but I could be wrong.

Nah.... we're at 71 already. So 80ish not massively out of the question even with McGill, which would make it one of the most prolific Worlds....last years was massive at 100, then two at 86 from 85-86, one with 83..
 
Selby isn’t fun to watch.

it’s nice when players have a mistake in them and the game can swing at any point.

Once Selby gets a couple of pots, I can pretty much bank on the frame being done whenever I watch him.

Ronnie is very beatable. Keep him off the table for 10 minutes and then play a safety. He’ll rush it and leave you a free pot.
 
Selby isn’t fun to watch.
i used yo be a fan, still kinda am compared to the others, but i went to the ni open game vs Higgins with my brother and he seen this on twitter this morning, triggered the bad memories

:lol:
 
Nah.... we're at 71 already. So 80ish not massively out of the question even with McGill, which would make it one of the most prolific Worlds....last years was massive at 100, then two at 86 from 85-86, one with 83..

I think it's selective memory. I would be interested to see the breakdown of centuries if you only evaluate quarter, semis and finals of tournaments down the years.
 
Selby with a century to start the day but then gifts the next frame away with a terrible miss having done all the hard work. 11-7 would have been curtains
 
Selby is going to be kicking himself at the break , he should have won all 4 and somehow he has thrown away 2 frames
 
Good battle this you can feel the nerves in it, being two behind isn’t too bad for Ronnie as long as he can keep the head together.
 
They were showing some of Robertson's run to the 2010 title in the break. Has anyone ever had an easier ride in the history of the tournament?

1) Fergal O'Brien
2) Martin Gould
QF) Steve Davis (20 years past his sell by date)
SF) Ali Carter
F) Graeme Dott