Tell me more about how your press is supposed to reach the levels of Bayern(or similar) to negate Busquets influence of the game?
First off, he's not playing the same type of midfield formation that Barcelona played out, with a double-pivot instead of Barcelona's single-pivot. Busquets tucks inside the central defenders to create space for himself, and it works because almost no team in Europe can match Barcelona's midfield. It spreads the opposition and offers simpler passing lanes. Bayern got the better of Barcelona's midfield because Schweinsteiger and Martínez could bully Barcelona's central midfielders, Martínez especially. When you're playing a double-pivot, unless there is a clear difference in terms of player roles it doesn't offer the lone midfielder freedom, which is exactly why I used Desailly as a pivot instead of a Desailly-Vieira pairing.
Secondly, Vieira is simply an animal when it comes to defending. He won the most tackles, was arguably the most aggressive defensively in Europe in his time. There is not a single midfielder in this draft, apart from Edgar Davids, who would do a better job at harassing midfielders, closing them down, and blocking passing lanes. Vieira at 6 feet 2 inches was not only strong, but fast, agile and intimidating.
Klaus Topmoller, Leverkusen coach, after Arsenal beat Leverkusen in the Champions League: "
He is a player par excellence. He wins every fight, anticipates the ball and is very aggressive. I'm not surprised that every team wants to buy him. He's one of the best players in the world. Vieira is by miles the best footballer in his position in the world."
Wenger on Vieira, after the same match: "
He won the ball and played it forward for the first two goals and then scored the third. There is not a better player in the world in that role but I have said that many times before."
Praise indeed, but just how influential is he? For a start you have to highlight the fact that this season Vieira has made 140 Premiership tackles which is not only more than any other player at Arsenal, it is more than any other player in the top flight. Within Highbury, that total is 58 more than the next-most prolific tackler (Ray Parlour) and the Frenchman is ever willing to stand tall and break up attacks, something he does with great success, winning over three quarters of the tackles he has attempted.
Is Vieira the world's best defensive midfielder?
Desailly on Vieira: "
I was with Roy Keane recently and he told me that Patrick Vieira was his toughest opponent. Today you can see that players have so much ability. In the past, having the fighting spirit was enough, but now you really need to have basic technical skills. But players like Keane and Vieira, they were able to make an impact because of their ability to compete all over the pitch."
Opta compared his tackling efficiency to the likes of Keane and Davids, and he completely dominated them in that tally. Davids with 61 tackles (87% success), Keane with 81 tackles (78% success). And it's really fantastic, to see it coming from someone who was just a box-to-box midfielder. If anything, Vieira's only weakness was that he never was a great shooter of the ball, but with his supporting cast it's not really necessary, is it?
Desailly will stick to Zidane, the attack-minded midfielder, just like Martínez was closing down Iniesta. And normally that would leave Redondo and Gullit as the spare men in midfield, both complete two-way midfielders. The key here is that instead of a man-marking mission from Bayern, it was Mueller simply playing his own role, what he excels at. The difference being how Desailly and Mueller would mark Busquets, where one is much more physical and aggressive, obviously Desailly.
Bayern didn't press Barcelona with their midfielders in the defensive third, only when they were nearer the half-way line and coming into Bayern's half. That's when the space becomes more constricted, as it's almost 10 men behind the ball. Busquets was constantly passing sideways, backwards, never threatening Bayern, because the spaces were closed down with such intensity. The likes of Giggs, Donadoni, Vieira, Gullit, Desailly -- these are all athletes who are no slouches defensively.
Denis Irwin was quoted a couple of years ago about Giggs, talking about how he felt so at ease attacking fullbacks because he knew Giggs would track back, support him defensively. Desailly, Gullit, Donadoni, these are all footballers who played under Sacchi and/or Capello. Sacchi was known for his two flat banks of four, with such a complete footballer in Gullit partnering van Basten, another all-around forward. Capello came in, immediately was playing Desailly in the holding midfield role. Capello emphasised Desailly's influence, saying: "
Let's not forget the turning point. That is Desailly's signing."
The way I see it, my group of midfielders all have the skill and intelligence to battle with Polaroid's midfield, but the x-factor here is how physical my group can get.
You would never see Busquets or Redondo getting into physical duels, instead they relied on tactical fouls and anticipation. I wish Zidane all the luck against someone like Desailly, marking him so closely. They don't call him "
The Octopus" for no reason. Desailly, the same marker who is raved about by the likes of Laudrup, Maldini, Litmanen, amongst others.
It's simply wearing them down, making sure they know that they won't be able to play the ball in my third of the pitch.