Donaldo
Caf Vigilante
Cheers MR, don't forget to click on 'vote Donadol'.
Since we were talking about past posts...
He also votes for IL. Below is his real PM:
Hey mate, could you forward my vote for the game between IL and Donadol? I am going for IL in this one.
Reasons : I'll start with the areas I think Donadol is superior. I think his batting depth shades it. Hooper and Cronje at 6 and 7 is very solid. But the fact is while these two very extremely solid players and if you are looking to save a game on the fifth day, you cannot ask for more grit, the amount of runs they will add won't make a huge difference if you are putting on a lead. On the other hand, IL has Lehmann and McCullum, Lehmann and Hooper were pretty even more or less, both with their bats and the part time bowling options, with McCullum being someone who can score quick runs. That could be quite useful IMO.
But the reason I would go for IL is his bowling attack. Akram and Saqlain are two of the most naturally talented cricketers to have ever played the game. Saqlain's downfall was pretty steep, but at his pomp he was constantly in the top bracket of spinners with Warne and Kumble. Atherton is a player who has fallen prey to every good pacer of his time A LOT. He is the most dismissed batsman by both McGrath and Ambrose. While Akram got him 4 times in 10 games, not as much as those two, it was still pretty easy for him. Atherton against a quality strike bowler is a dangerous proposition and he is not someone like Sehwag who can take the game away before giving away his wicket cheaply. I think Watson would provide similar fragility at the top, and Donald would get him as well. On the other hand, there is Donald and Vettori, both of whom IMO are inferior to Wasim and Saqlain. I don't see Vettori giving a lot of trouble while on the other hand Saqlain was unplayable at times.
Ponting and Chanderpaul is an excellent middle order to have. Compliment each other excellently and neither of them would be easy to get 9 out of 10 times. The most important thing is Ponting can accelerate the scoring without risking his wicket like few others.
To me the bowling attack of IL is more decisive than Donadol's, which added with his superior middle order changes the game.
Just a last point that was brought to my attention and something I'd addressed in the last round...my team has very capable leaders like Cronje, Sanga, Vettori and to an extent, Athers and Hooper who possess a ruthless, never-say-die attitude which works brilliantly coupled with the attacking nature of my team overall.
Atherton, Waugh, Anwar and Hooper are a genuinely sexy slip cordon.
feck this is tough...Donadol middle order is very good but on the other side you have akram and saqlain. two of my favourite players.
I dont like IL's opening or his bowlers as cork and gul are not that good to be main choices.
Donaldol batting is very strong and his bowling is not that bat either. Cant see any real weaknesses in his team(aamir for me doesnt count, the kid was destined for greatness).
I have Chanderpaul and Ponting in my middle order Not to mention I actually have more bowlers than him. He has 3
But thanks for the vote MJJ.
Much as I loved Hooper, I'd struggle to use words like "ruthless and never-say-die" for him. At times, he seemed about to fall asleep while batting and always stuck me as lazy.
Athers as well. Very protective of his wicket but no Hussain when it came to desperation to win. Pretty affable bloke was how he stuck me.
I'll give you Cronje and to a fair extent Sanga and Vettori.
I dont think there is much between sangakara,waugh and pointing and chanderpaul. peterson gives him the edge imo but this is a very very tight match.
feck this is tough. ok if we are considering the bowlers at their peak I think you would win. Can I change my vote to IL?
ok final vote- IL.
Cronje fixed matches to lose
Much as I loved Hooper, I'd struggle to use words like "ruthless and never-say-die" for him. At times, he seemed about to fall asleep while batting and always stuck me as lazy.
Athers as well. Very protective of his wicket but no Hussain when it came to desperation to win. Pretty affable bloke was how he stuck me.
I'll give you Cronje and to a fair extent Sanga and Vettori.
yCouple of games and like you, I hated him for it after really admiring that South African team but basically the guy was a sore loser.
I don't remember all the details. Did he even suceed in fixing a game? He didn't get enough players involved to manage fixing an entire game from what I recall.
cnut though.
Couple of games and like you, I hated him for it after really admiring that South African team but basically the guy was a sore loser.
I don't remember all the details. Did he even suceed in fixing a game? He didn't get enough players involved to manage fixing an entire game from what I recall.
cnut though.
Think he succeeded in fixing a test match between England and South Africa that was heading to a draw because of the rain. Gave England a low-ish target which they managed to get to. Remember Atherton not celebrating because he felt that something was fishy.
He offered to make it a single innings game, iirc.
Mystifying really. The money wasn't huge (or huge enough to make a real difference to his lifestyle) and involving so many people meant it would get around.
Ruined the game for me for a fair while. Made it impossible to make fun of idiot conspiracy theorists (you know the kind...people who believed India would always be world champions if not for fixing).
Well played, IL. All the best for the next round.
Our teams were better than any of the other ones too.
I'd take Donald if I were you, btw. Sanga has to be tempting too, but you don't really need a WK, nor someone at 3. Shame.
Isn't this a draw?
MJJ changed his vote.