antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
I suspect it was the lack of thigh exposure on the image used.I weep for Pupi.
Edit: ffs, didn't realise someone picked him. Skipped him for Keane with a heavy heart.
I suspect it was the lack of thigh exposure on the image used.I weep for Pupi.
Edit: ffs, didn't realise someone picked him. Skipped him for Keane with a heavy heart.
That is if you get that dying is wrong, for example. Or that you can eliminate the threat by shooting at it. Or that you can move and you should go forward in order to succeed.
(showcasing my latin) But the network itself is a tabula rasa - and if the concept of a game, winning etc. is natural to human (homo ludens and everything), or any other conscious animal, it's not a given to a blank neural network, which has to learn somehow that winning is better than not winning.
A strange place to have this discussion, probably
Googling that... I guess I oversold it. They don't know that there are monsters, walls, that they have to shoot or kill, but when they find ammo they "understand that it's good", so there is some basic understanding of good/bad programmed into them.Do you have a link to that ? Because i thought the tabula rasa aspect was only in regards to rules and programming of the specific games but the deep network still had an overarching premise like "high score = good" that spurs the learning process.
Googling that... I guess I oversold it. They don't know that there are monsters, walls, that they have to shoot or kill, but when they find ammo they "understand that it's good", so there is some basic understanding of good/bad programmed into them.
All that was lacking there was Giggs' chest hair popping out.
Surely after a few rounds of standing still and getting shot the network will try to do something. Not to win but just because the exercise looks completely pointless and there must be more to it. At the very least this "tabula rasa" should have an in-built inquisitive nature that leads to trial and error?That is if you get that dying is wrong, for example. Or that you can eliminate the threat by shooting at it. Or that you can move and you should go forward in order to succeed.
(showcasing my latin) But the network itself is a tabula rasa - and if the concept of a game, winning etc. is natural to human (homo ludens and everything), or any other conscious animal, it's not a given to a blank neural network, which has to learn somehow that winning is better than not winning.
A strange place to have this discussion, probably
Apologies guys, I'm at the funeral. I'll make the pick in a few hours.
If you guys can't wait then move on without me and I'll make a lick tonight.
Lovely stuff.Aye, that was a clear standout amid an underwhelming Bamboozle selection.
Shaping up nicely:
Drop me a few lines with tactics you are going for and key roles you need and I'll give you a bunch of options to choose from.Apologies guys, I'm at the funeral. I'll make the pick in a few hours.
If you guys can't wait then move on without me and I'll make a lick tonight.
Is downcast now ecstatic?
Hmm stuck in two minds here about which way to go from here. Any impartials knocking about to bounce an idea or two off? cheers
Apologies guys, I'm at the funeral. I'll make the pick in a few hours.
If you guys can't wait then move on without me and I'll make a lick tonight.
Hmm stuck in two minds here about which way to go from here.
Cheers, we were looking to give you a good player that also fits the style.
Will pick in half an our just getting up.
About fecking time! Picked him as my Nesta non-WC winning (x2) replacement.
Since NM can't pick my next guy, I'm almost done with name and surname targets (i.e. clear top target for a role). Just one more, then fill up the rest easily.
I frankly don't see why you'd care either way. A «special event» could feck you over completely - and that's without considering that you will lose a random player through injury at some point.
Making plans is pointless. The only thing which makes sense in this draft is to ride your luck.
It is why, I fecking keep banging on the drum that he who wins the mental battle wins the game, period! You can be the strongest, fastest, tallest, and have the technique down to a tee, none of that can ever, EVER, overcome someone who's already seen 3 steps ahead of you. We know what Cruyff said about pace -All that was lacking there was Giggs' chest hair popping out.
Not sure what I like most about that image, the thighs or the way he looks completely comfortable and non-plussed about the threat of Ryan Giggs of all people.
Without a shadow of a doubt my favourite RB ever.
What is speed? The sports press often confuses speed with insight. See, if I start running slightly earlier than someone else, I seem faster.
Lovely stuff.
He's already signed up!Which are your preferred teams here?
Come-back in the next draft?
brains >>>>> brauns, forever!
Hmm stuck in two minds here about which way to go from here. Any impartials knocking about to bounce an idea or two off? cheers
That's very sweet of you, announcing your vote for my team before the game's began.F that. Vidic vs Drogba is where it's at. Little midgets running around puts me to sleep
Saw your team and your probably right. Only mine is better of courseThat's very sweet of you, announcing your vote for my team before the game's began.
Saw your team and your probably right. Only mine is better of course
It is why, I fecking keep banging on the drum that he who wins the mental battle wins the game, period!
It's precisely why I posted that game.Fair or not, it is when surrounded by ordinary -not crap- men that you can gage the significant impact their genius and dominant performances makes.
It's precisely why I posted that game.
Disagree. Randomness means you should PLAN for a flexible side not overreliant on any one player.I frankly don't see why you'd care either way. A «special event» could feck you over completely - and that's without considering that you will lose a random player through injury at some point.
Making plans is pointless. The only thing which makes sense in this draft is to ride your luck.
That wasn't an ordinary side... well, yes, by Real standards and given the quality of the opposition. Fair enough.
I think he was looking at pictures of Rudi Krol.... feck me, he was good looking?!
Yeah could have well been a moviestar if not a footballer.I think he was looking at pictures of Rudi Krol.... feck me, he was good looking?!