Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 33,159
Juve are signing Milik I thoughtJuve are crazy if they pay that.
Juve are signing Milik I thoughtJuve are crazy if they pay that.
He will be here mate, every year Neves is leaving yet every year he’s still here, Nuno is building something special at Wolves and you can tell by our players social media and the noises coming from them that they love it here, they spend days together as families and eat and socialise together, they also all live within 2 miles of the training ground so spend lots of downtime together, I’ve never known a squad like it in 31 years of watching the wolves, follow Raul on Instagram and tell me of it looks like a player about to leave
Worst decision we would've ever made? Quite the extreme there. Anyway, that's not important.Surely you don't believe that, will be one of the worse decision we ever made.
Richarlison is not an elite talent and we already have alot of players around his age who are better quality. Getting the other two make us a better team on the short and long term.
€40m + Dalot going the other way
I won't because Sancho is a generational talent while Richarlison is not.Worst decision we would've ever made? Quite the extreme there. Anyway, that's not important.
I actually rate Richarlison as one of the better attacking players in the Premier League. Still only 23. Versatile. Can play in any of the top three positions. Hard worker. Good header of the ball. He's quite a handful for defenders and he has an eye for a goal. Getting one player that I rate a lot higher than other two guys that I don't rate as high is a no-brainer for me. I mean, you'd want us to sign players that are here to challenge the starting eleven. Not to be backups. I'd say if we would have had Richarlison in the squad these last games, he would have started instead of Rashford.
I'm guessing this all comes down to me rating Richarlison a lot higher than you do. Just for example. Would you sign Grealish and Jimenez instead of Sancho if you had to choose?
Man Utd Sainz saying Jimenez is close to a move to Juve for €80m.
I think richarlison has it in him to be a top top player. I rate him highly.Worst decision we would've ever made? Quite the extreme there. Anyway, that's not important.
I actually rate Richarlison as one of the better attacking players in the Premier League. Still only 23. Versatile. Can play in any of the top three positions. Hard worker. Good header of the ball. He's quite a handful for defenders and he has an eye for a goal. Getting one player that I rate a lot higher than other two guys that I don't rate as high is a no-brainer for me. I mean, you'd want us to sign players that are here to challenge the starting eleven. Not to be backups. I'd say if we would have had Richarlison in the squad these last games, he would have started instead of Rashford.
I'm guessing this all comes down to me rating Richarlison a lot higher than you do. Just for example. Would you sign Grealish and Jimenez instead of Sancho if you had to choose?
Tweet?There's no way this Jiminez rumour is true.
1. The source obviously jumped to conclusions because Wolves are after a new striker and Jiminez was linked to us last year.
2. Jiminez is coming off a 17 goal season, Wolves are a rival table position wise and he has 3 years left on his contract. We would be looking at a 70-80 million pound purchase at least. Why would we spend that when were currently haggling a 100 million pound deal for another attacking player.
3. Martial had the best season of his career this year. Don't think getting in a second striker to share minutes with him is going to make him feel too great.
4. Greenwood is second in line for that number 9 position after having an amazing breakthrough seeason. He will already be side lined most likely for sancho if we get him over the line, which would severly limit his playing time.
5. Not a single English journalist has reported this.
Feel free to save this tweet untill the transfer window ends because this rumour makes absolutely no sense.
I think I saw it on page 1.Tweet?
Don't know how he's still at Everton.I think richarlison has it in him to be a top top player. I rate him highly.
He'd be very good for us, can play across the front line. I would be very interested in him if he were available.I think richarlison has it in him to be a top top player. I rate him highly.
We have enough strikers that play wideHe'd be very good for us, can play across the front line. I would be very interested in him if he were available.
Personally, I think he plays best through the middle. But he would be a more versatile rotations than IghaloWe have enough strikers that play wide
Can't see this happening, in fact don't believe the report at all.
Why - wrong position - if he is right winger, I might take a bite. Forward, to replace Martial?
Wrong age group, won't be cheap as Wolves is not relegating. So why should we pay 60-80m for a backup striker? Can't afford to repeat another Sanchez mistake. Buy a Right Wing, at whatever price I won't care. But not a left wing or forward who will upset the balance of Martial + Rashford.
Ok let me rephrase. We have enough strikers who are of that type. Pacey wide forwards. We need a different type of striker for when Ole needs to change the game and give the opposition a different look.Personally, I think he plays best through the middle. But he would be a more versatile rotations than Ighalo
Fergie would have bought him for sureDon't know how he's still at Everton.
True, very good points. He could form a high pressing, energetic front 3 and martial is developing his hold up play. But you're right, we do need an alternative in the ilk of Jimenez.Ok let me rephrase. We have enough strikers who are of that type. Pacey wide forwards. We need a different type of striker for when Ole needs to change the game and give the opposition a different look.
This is why Igahlo as a signing was good, but its clear we need a better version.
Richarlison isnt going to pose a totally different threat and ask different questions to a Rashford or Greenwood through the middle. A Jimenez certainly would. I doubt we sign him though but maybe in Jan we need to sign that type of striker
If it were up to me my friend you could keep bothGuys he’s not coming to you, he won’t leave us, too old at 29 for the sort of money we’d command, file this one in the bin
oh, and you can go and do one about Neves you cheeky sods, if he leaves I’ll have a meltdown
I dont mind his mood as long as he keeps scoring. Jimenez is nothing close to a top striker, the last two years have been his best scoring season and he's 29! Infact Martial scored more open play goals in EPL than your top top striker.Martial is not as consistent as the top top strikers are, he’s a god player but not top drawer in my view. Better this season but too moody. Jimenez would be a great buy but it’s probably just more paper talk. Wolves don’t need the money so maybe he wants a move to play CL as he is running out of chances at 29.
Jimenez wont be a starter even if he came, so pointless for what he'd cost, Neves though will be a gem.Guys he’s not coming to you, he won’t leave us, too old at 29 for the sort of money we’d command, file this one in the bin
oh, and you can go and do one about Neves you cheeky sods, if he leaves I’ll have a meltdown
Many of us posters on here complain about depth and our lack of it but yet when we try to sign depth people say our squads good enough.
The club cannot win.
Exactly. Foolish to sign him for big money and have to replace him in another couple of seasons. Going for a top player like RVP who is ageing is one thing. Jiminez who is sort of in the pretty good tier and not really an upgrade for big money and is 29 to me makes no sense.Wrong age profile? 29 and at £60M?
This squad isn't expected to start peaking for another 2-3 seasons. To spend that sort of money on a 29y.o now seems to be out of line with the current approach.
I think its fake.