Alemar
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
- Messages
- 8,162
Why is there such an obsession with a 30 year old Kane? Our manager seems to prefer younger players (which in itself is fine), and operating off a limited budget, Hojlund is a decent choice
His legs could be going, or he could turn out to be like Ibra and score goals galore until he’s 38. Point is, spending 100 million £ on him would be crazy.Why is there such an obsession with a 30 year old Kane? Our manager seems to prefer younger players (which in itself is fine), and operating off a limited budget, Hojlund is a decent choice
Why is there such an obsession with a 30 year old Kane? Our manager seems to prefer younger players (which in itself is fine), and operating off a limited budget, Hojlund is a decent choice
To be honest being Denmark's number 1 isn't saying much at all. His competition is Jonas Wind and Martin Brathwaite.
Even SAF would not have performed miracles under similar circumstances
not only that there is a real shortage of top class strikers and the few that are, outside our current shopping range. Heck even average strikers are being quoted for 100m.
I don’t think you can lay the blame on Ten Hag or Murtough and his team. Lay the blame on the owners who can’t make quick decisions when it comes to money. Sooner they are gone the better
Why is there such an obsession with a 30 year old Kane? Our manager seems to prefer younger players (which in itself is fine), and operating off a limited budget, Hojlund is a decent choice
If I had to guess I’d say we finish 5th or 6th next season. The amount of games we played last season will catch up with our players.I think it was more a case of Liverpool and Chelsea drastically underperforming. I expect those two to be better, what with City and Arsenal up there, possibly Newcastle again, we could just miss out.
Real Madrid spend 40m on 17 year old Vinicius Junior when he has hardly even kick a ball in any top level games. They also spend around the same (40m) on 18 year old Rodrygo, who has only scored 17 goals in 80 games in Brazil league.
Sometimes when you see talent, you have to buy them earlier before they turn into another Haaland or Osimhen, and eventually become unattainable even at very high price.
Real Madrid is a bad example. They can always do these kinds of deals as they are loaded with cash. They wasted 150m on Hazard . We dont have unlimited funds so that's my concern.
We actually underperformed our xG by about 7 goals last season, which I believe would’ve gotten us closer to second place, if we had been on par with our xG.
By contrast both Arsenal and City overperformed their xG by c. 14 goals.
I agree that xG are not everything, but we clearly saw last season that our inability to score actually allowed opponents to get back into games and put us under pressure.
Real Madrid spend 40m on 17 year old Vinicius Junior when he has hardly even kick a ball in any top level games. They also spend around the same (40m) on 18 year old Rodrygo, who has only scored 17 goals in 80 games in Brazil league.
Sometimes when you see talent, you have to buy them earlier before they turn into another Haaland or Osimhen, and eventually become unattainable even at very high price.
Well we sort of have to be in this market. The striker market is incredibly slim pickings right now. The only two probable guarantees in Osimhen and Kane have been priced out. So what do you propose as an alternative? Not buy a striker at all?With Vicious and Rodrygo, Madrid could afford to play them 3 seasons with 35 games each, before they bear any fruit in their 4th season.
Unless you're fine with that kind waiting time with our potentially new striker.
Yes no one predicted Liverpool being so poor and Chelsea struggling to make top half of the table. That doesn’t make us over performers.We definitely overperformed: virtually no one predicted us making top four.
Don't know where you get those stats from, but Understat have us at xG of 71.90 for the last season. With 58 goals scored, our xG difference was shocking +13.90 meaning that we should have scored at least 14 goals more.
If I had to guess I’d say we finish 5th or 6th next season. The amount of games we played last season will catch up with our players.
I think Hojlund would be good for at least 14 goals if he was first choice. He was scoring an average of 0.44 goals per 90 minutes in the league last season, so it's not big jump.Don't know where you get those stats from, but Understat have us at xG of 71.90 for the last season. With 58 goals scored, our xG difference was shocking +13.90 meaning that we should have scored at least 14 goals more.
Yes no one predicted Liverpool being so poor and Chelsea struggling to make top half of the table. That doesn’t make us over performers.
Oh I’d love Kane but even if we free up wiggle room I can’t see us spending 100m on him when he will be free next summer. I suspect we will bring in another forward after we have sold one or 2Oh absolutely mate. This is 100% on the Glazers. ETH and Murtough are doing a fantastic job this summer with their hands financially tied behind their backs.
It’s just very concerning that Rashford was our only consistent goal scorer last season and we could be going into the new season with no recognised striker leading the line.
Yes, Kane at 30 is not worth £100 million, but the 30-40 goals he’d likely score could be the difference between winning a PL or CL or finishing outside the top5.
Saw the highlight videos. I'm sold. Get this kid
Maybe that chap from Porto?I wouldn’t be surprised that we bring in an experienced striker in addition to Rasmus Højlund as per Laurie Whitwell report, but this will probably be dependent on a couple of sales.
If ETH pushes like he did Antony, and if the funds are there to use, then I really feel like we'd go for this year. Some pretty big ifs in there however.Oh I’d love Kane but even if we free up wiggle room I can’t see us spending 100m on him when he will be free next summer. I suspect we will bring in another forward after we have sold one or 2
Yeah creating chances wasn't the problem on the whole, but we only had Rashford to rely on finishing then regularly.
I think Hojlund would be good for at least 14 goals if he was first choice. He was scoring an average of 0.44 goals per 90 minutes in the league last season, so it's not big jump.
How does he rate in the following?
1) Be a presence (reading and making of the actual space/runs) in the box for low and head height crosses at the near post and the penalty spot.
Above average
2) Aerial long balls from the defenders/Onana with his back against defenders i.e strength, heading, judging the flight of the ball etc.
Above average
3) Running off the shoulder of defenders from long balls/passes/through balls.
Above average
4) First touch and hold up play when given to him to feet with his back against defenders.
Average
5) Passing in short and tight spaces.
Below average
6) All round game intelligence to get himself and others involved.
Average
7) Work rate.
Above average
8) Ability to create chances for himself/dribbling and ball carrying.
Above average
9) Finishing when given the ball in those 'typical' penalty box chances.
Average
I think if he ranks average or above in most of these, he'll do fine. He'll get chances from our players and he'll create them simply by being there in the right places.
If ETH pushes like he did Antony, and if the funds are there to use, then I really feel like we'd go for this year. Some pretty big ifs in there however.
Maybe that chap from Porto?
Yeah but we were told at the time that deal had repercussions to this years budget. Unless we do sales there is no wiggle roomIf ETH pushes like he did Antony, and if the funds are there to use, then I really feel like we'd go for this year. Some pretty big ifs in there however.
Maybe that chap from Porto?
From The Athletic which got it from Opta, but I also read 14 xG difference from other sourcesDon't know where you get those stats from, but Understat have us at xG of 71.90 for the last season. With 58 goals scored, our xG difference was shocking +13.90 meaning that we should have scored at least 14 goals more.
And there's reason why they are the most successful club in Europe too, yet we spend more than them.Also, Luka Jovic for 60 Million Euros. Real Madrid isn't afraid to take risks.
But everyone now knows that was basically a last hurrah signing, we shouldn’t be signing players that might help us challenge for a year or two we should be signing players that can potentially help us challenge for a decadeThe same reason our greatest ever manager signed a 29 year old RVP, guaranteed goals!
I do get Haaland vibes but i worryingly get Nunez vibes too.
I’d take something in between tbf
Darling NulandNuland? Or Haanez?
He seems to be a lot more in control and less chaotic than Nunez? Not that one way or the other yields more or less goals. But I don't get Nunez vibes.I do get Haaland vibes but i worryingly get Nunez vibes too.