steeeb
Full Member
I think he's obviously not a right fit and needs to go but not sure how many takers there will be - he'll probably get loaned out if we get someone in to put him in the shop window.
It's nuts.Madness that the club paid so much for a guy who only made it into the Atalanta side because all their other strikers were injured. He became a regular in January, 6 months later the club spends £70m. Its honestly baffling
It makes you wonder what some fans even see in him.It's nuts.
I was thinking recently that it's useful to have some past pedigree when signing youngsters. Especially for big fees. On the higher end, everyone knew for years - long before his debut - that Yamal was special. Cherki too, although it took him longer to start fulfilling that early promise. Bellingham, Musiala, Simons are all currently fulfilling teenage hype. Kids like Gittens, Duranville, Doku, Skelly, Cubarsi etc were similar. Not just playing but starring at every age range for club and country.
It doesn't always work out but it speaks to an inherent level of talent.
Hojlund never had that. He managed 3 goals in 21 games for Denmark's youth sides (mostly Under 16 and Under 19).
At Copenhagen he was a youngster and understandably couldn't displace 21 year old Jonas Wind, who was a solid enough 1 in 3 striker. Wind was eventually sold to Wolfsburg for £8m but Hojlund still wasn't trusted to take over. Copenhagen instead went with 30 year old Free transfer Khouma Babacar, who's currently playing in the Turkish second division. Hojlund was sold for £1.5m, having scored 0 goals in 19 league games. He did bag some in the Conference League but wasn't considered a credible prospect to lead the line for them.
At Sturm Graz he scored 1 in his first 11 games but then went on a hot streak, scoring 8 in his next 9. Just 7 months after arriving he signed for Atalanta for £14m.
Atalanta he was similarly patchy. Again he started with 1 goal in his first 11 games and ended up finishing with 10 goals across all competitions.
Then we come in. Dropping up to £72 million on him, exactly 17 months after he left Copenhagen without a single league goal to his name.
Nothing in his career REMOTELY suggests he was that level of talent. It's one of the strangest transfers ever made.
It's nuts.
I was thinking recently that it's useful to have some past pedigree when signing youngsters. Especially for big fees. On the higher end, everyone knew for years - long before his debut - that Yamal was special. Cherki too, although it took him longer to start fulfilling that early promise. Bellingham, Musiala & Simons are all currently living up to their teenage hype. Kids like Gittens, Duranville, Doku, Skelly, Cubarsi etc were similar. Not just playing but starring at every age range for club and country.
It doesn't always work out but it speaks to an inherent level of talent.
Hojlund never had that. He managed 3 goals in 21 games for Denmark's youth sides (mostly Under 16 and Under 19).
At Copenhagen he was a youngster and understandably couldn't displace 21 year old Jonas Wind, who was a solid enough 1 in 3 striker. Wind was eventually sold to Wolfsburg for £8m but Hojlund still wasn't trusted to take over. Copenhagen instead went with 30 year old Free transfer Khouma Babacar, who's currently playing in the Turkish second division. Hojlund was sold for £1.5m, having scored 0 goals in 19 league games. He did bag some in the Conference League but wasn't considered a credible prospect to lead the line for them.
At Sturm Graz he scored 1 in his first 11 games but then went on a hot streak, scoring 8 in his next 9. Just 7 months after arriving he signed for Atalanta for £14m.
Atalanta he was similarly patchy. Again he started with 1 goal in his first 11 games and ended up finishing with 10 goals across all competitions.
Then we come in. Exactly 17 months after he left Copenhagen without a single league goal to his name we choose to drop a transfer fee of up to £72 million on him.
Nothing in his career REMOTELY suggests he was that level of talent. It's one of the strangest transfers ever made.
<<What horrible, lazy analysis: oh, it's a back five, so it must be defensive and deep.
Before his unfortunate injury, Martinez had begun to understand the Amorim system. A spare CB pushes into midfield, progresses the play and maybe even gets goals. We've seen Yoro do that recently as well. In fact, he gave an interview a week or so ago saying that Amorim wants the back three to be playmakers, dictate the game and instigate attacks. Seen even Mazroui do it, and Maguire with his big switches.
Dalot constantly finds himself in dangerous areas, as does Dorgu. They need to run with the ball more, and Dalot especially needs to stay high as often as possible.
These excuses for a mediocre player simply must stop.
He needs taking out of the firing line but we got no one to be able to do that.
That chance where he was too late just sums him up, I do think there’s a player in there but we haven’t got time to find him.
2 seasons and season one he scored 15 which was a decent starting point.How long has he been at the club? I think we've been more than patient enough to find that player. Thing is when players go through dips in form its usually then try and get the basics right, pass, move, tackle, involve yourself in the game. Look at Hojlund stats each game, it's diabolical because he doesn't even get that right.
I think he's obviously not a right fit and needs to go but not sure how many takers there will be - he'll probably get loaned out if we get someone in to put him in the shop window.
2 seasons and season one he scored 15 which was a decent starting point.
To be fair, it was supposedly 62+bonus that no doubt will never be realised, if that helps at all?Noted but he won't be good enough for United if we aspire to get back to challenging for the title in a couple years. No idea who or what was the final say for plonking down 70 million for him. This is Gyokeres money.
To be fair, it was supposedly 62+bonus that no doubt will never be realised, if that helps at all?
Yeah he’s turned out to be a shocking transfer, absolutely need another striker and he needs to be benched/loaned/sold, for his own good really as I do feel sorry for the boy.
<<
What horrible, lazy analysis: oh, it's a back five, so it must be defensive and deep.
>>
Its very defensive in the current form/players we have and you are mistaken if you assume it is not. But that is different discussion.
I think he has attributes and has showed glimpses of being a player that can do that. Whether he will is a different question.
I'm objecting to people just clowning on one of their own players consistently. His prior two seasons have been 10 in 34 for Atalanta and 16 in 43 last season. Those aren't bad stats for someone who is 22. They're not good enough for the main #9 at a struggling Utd (not his fault) but there's something to build on. In old Utd teams we'd have shrugged our shoulders and said 'young and learnin' but in this day there's a rush to go pile on to his performances page and crap on him.
His patch of scoring last season more shows that he could be prolific with a bit of confidence and rounding to his game, not that he's already peaked at 22. From a pure goal scoring perspective, Rooney has probably as streaky and not perceived as a clinical/natural finisher until he was 25.
It makes you wonder what some fans even see in him.
Rooney could play football. Hojlund can barely trap a ball.
As someone who watched both Rooney and Ronaldo come up, I'm baffled at how you can look at Hojlund and compare him with Rooney.
Said it countless times: Charlie Adams was young once too.
He will be out the firing line as he'll be sold. No ambitious club would keep a player as bad as HojlundShearer would know a thing or two about being a successful striker in England, wouldn't he?
I don't think Hojlund was this bad when he started out with us. Not only did the club's recruitment and squad planning sabotage our performances this season by having a center forward nullifying any good work around him, but I am afraid we have also managed to sabotage the development of a young player by throwing him into the most high pressure environment he could be in when he is not ready. Maybe there's a potential PL level player in there, maybe he's not good enough for this level. Either way, this is a completely wrong approach to developing a player, and we're paying a very heavy price both on and off the pitch for this idiotic decision making. Hojlund is as much a victim of this environment as the rest of the team is a victim of his poor game up top.
Our transfers this summer must get this kid out of the firing line in order for anything to be salvaged from his young career.
Agree with this 100% when we signed him it was a case of getting him and a proven striker in, the proven striker never arrived and he was left to lead the line which was madness. Like Shearer said you would need to be exceptional to do that and Rasmus isn’t there yet. It’s been poor management by the club and Obi will go through the same thing unless recruitment is done correctlyShearer would know a thing or two about being a successful striker in England, wouldn't he?
I don't think Hojlund was this bad when he started out with us. Not only did the club's recruitment and squad planning sabotage our performances this season by having a center forward nullifying any good work around him, but I am afraid we have also managed to sabotage the development of a young player by throwing him into the most high pressure environment he could be in when he is not ready. Maybe there's a potential PL level player in there, maybe he's not good enough for this level. Either way, this is a completely wrong approach to developing a player, and we're paying a very heavy price both on and off the pitch for this idiotic decision making. Hojlund is as much a victim of this environment as the rest of the team is a victim of his poor game up top.
Our transfers this summer must get this kid out of the firing line in order for anything to be salvaged from his young career.
I think Hojlund will do okay, but he is not the big talent we thought he was. If INEOS are serious about us challenging for the league in the future, he’s not the striker to lead the line.Is he going to "turn it around" elsewhere when we sell him, or is he walking the Obertan path?
Looks like the latter right now.
I want this Hojlund back
I think he's bulked up too much and completely less mobile this season and awkward, bit like when Torres when to Chelsea. If he cuts a bit of the muscle might be back playing okay again.He is not even quick anymore. So often the CB is quicker than him. It also not a confidence issue - he is just not good
I want this Hojlund back
I want this Hojlund back
No, none of that mate. No assumptions here, just analyzing the game, so give me specifics. I'm tired of tacticos on here and elsewhere just stating that it's defensive without considering the dynamics of the game and HOW we actually play. None of this 'oh, it's five at the back, so it's got to be defensive'. This ain't MOTD or Talksport.
He can also just hands in transfer request, if he truly feels that he's a victim in all this.Shearer would know a thing or two about being a successful striker in England, wouldn't he?
I don't think Hojlund was this bad when he started out with us. Not only did the club's recruitment and squad planning sabotage our performances this season by having a center forward nullifying any good work around him, but I am afraid we have also managed to sabotage the development of a young player by throwing him into the most high pressure environment he could be in when he is not ready. Maybe there's a potential PL level player in there, maybe he's not good enough for this level. Either way, this is a completely wrong approach to developing a player, and we're paying a very heavy price both on and off the pitch for this idiotic decision making. Hojlund is as much a victim of this environment as the rest of the team is a victim of his poor game up top.
Our transfers this summer must get this kid out of the firing line in order for anything to be salvaged from his young career.
I think he's bulked up too much and completely less mobile this season and awkward, bit like when Torres when to Chelsea. If he cuts a bit of the muscle might be back playing okay again.
The muscle doesn't suit his qualities whatsoever and has seemed to slow his acceleration, ball control, movement, basically everything. He wasn't as bad as this last season.