The Urban Goose
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 1,537
He was 29 in Rooney years though.132 goals before his 25th birthday.
He was 29 in Rooney years though.132 goals before his 25th birthday.
He might get 200, but nowhere near Rooney. He's just not proliferate enough. Hes played well for an handful of games and will this last?
Martials best season was what? 23 goals? He has also scored about half the goals the amount Rashford has for Utd. They are both 1 in 3 players.
How exactly will improving his shooting skill to the level of someone who scores roughly the same amount of goals per game help him become Utd's record goal scorer?
Yes you are right!Sorry, I don’t really want to take on the role of grammar cnut here, but I’ve got a feeling you might be confusing proliferate with prolific in this instance.
If Rashford beat that, we are not going to win much..
This, some people post the most ridiculous things here.We won’t win much with an attacker that scores 150 goals in the next 7 or so years? That’s a minimum of 20 per year on average every single year.
Ok.We won’t win much with an attacker that scores 150 goals in the next 7 or so years? That’s a minimum of 20 per year on average every single year.
Ok.
Have Rashford ever scored 20 pl goals?
Ok.
Have Rashford ever scored 20 pl goals?
Is it ridiculous to have doubts that RaThis, some people post the most ridiculous things here.
For Rashford to reach 20 pl goals, he needs to be the main man. I dont belive he will reach 20 if he is not the main man.Do you think he'd need to for us to win things? Rooney did that twice for us and we didn't win the league either of those seasons.
Now Rooney of course was a much better all-round player. Still, with the right players around him Rashford is good enough to feature in successful teams for me at least. Not as the star man in a front three, but good enough to play a role.
Is it ridiculous to have doubts that Ra
For Rashford to reach 20 pl goals, he needs to be the main man. I dont belive he will reach 20 if he is not the main man.
He is quite experiencd at this point and he has not one singel time reached 20.
I do not belive he would help our team the way Rooney did also. To me Rashford is a good player. Nothing more.
You also need consistency to win things. Rashford is not very consistent. He is consistent in beeing unconsistent.
How many times had he won the league? Or the top scorer?
So yeah i have my doubts at Rashford beeing our 20+ goal a season guy that helps us winning the big trophyes. I hope im wrong.
This makes more sense to me yeah.I agree that for him to score 20 in the league alone he'd need to be the main man. I'd also say that he's probably never going to be good enough to be the main man in a team that wants to collect trophies for fun.
I was more responding to the point of him us not being able to win much if he did end up as our all-time top scorer. For me he could be part of an attack in a successful team.
Drop him into an attack with players of the calibre of Kane and Son, Firmino and Salah of the past few seasons or a younger Rooney and Ronaldo and you've got yourself a scary forward line who could win a lot.
Do we have that level of player around him? No. Would he be the weakest of the three in such an attack? Yes. You could also say a lot of players could do it as well to be fair.
Two top class forwards plush Rashford could well be good enough is all I'm saying. He wouldn't need to hit 20 PL goals season after season, just get close to it in all competitions combined. It's not exactly simple or easy to achieve and hopefully Antony develops into one of those players for us.
Ding ding ding.TBH, comparing these two is an insult to Rooney.
It’s the opposite to nostalgia.TBH, comparing these two is an insult to Rooney.