The Purley King
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
- Messages
- 4,887
Swap for rashford?
I don’t think PSGs manager would have him.Swap for rashford?
Swap for rashford?
Agreed I’m not saying RKM is the answer but maybe a loan swap for the rest of the season might not be the worst thing.No, just lose Rashford.
RKM is bang average. Another Zirkzee.
I appreciate he's cheap(er), but we really do not need another forward who fails to consistently score goals, and is famous for bottling his biggest chance.
That doesn't mean I need to furnish you viable replacements, either. We need better than RKM.
What's the point?Agreed I’m not saying RKM is the answer but maybe a loan swap for the rest of the season might not be the worst thing.
Not in the Antony kind of wayDoes Muani put in a shift at least? Depending on if he does or not and his wage demands, I'd say it's best if the club did a swap deal for Rashford.
Look at it this way, we get rid of player we will more than likely struggle to, we get a player in return who can play ball and put in a shift (not another Antony kinda way). We removed the contract of Rashford.
Like realistically, we just get rid of Rashford, we are already on a wafer thin squad depth.
Does Muani put in a shift at least?
Probably not Hakimi considering his rape allegation last year.Definite no from me. Give us Vitinha, Nuno or Hakimi instead
For some reason I thought those charges were dropped/nothing ever came of it....yikes! but scrap him then, yeah! The other two thoughProbably not Hakimi considering his rape allegation last year.
Very over rated player, has been poor since he's been at PSG.
Well just in case anyone does.How is overrated when no one rates him?
When have the likes of PSG, City and Chelsea cared about FFP?Selling him cheaply would be horrendous for PSG‘s FFP, if they care about stuff like that…
Chelsea very much care. Or why do you think so many players have been given seemingly infinite contracts?When have the likes of PSG, City and Chelsea cared about FFP?
Why go back until 2020 for Osimhen but only until 2023 for Gyokeres, who is older?Not as good as Osimhen or Gyokeres.
Only thing for him is that he’s cheaper but we don’t need another gamble
Osimhen (25). €70M
24/25 P. 15. G. 12. A. 5. 1.13. Turkey
20/24 P. 133. G.76 A. 18. 0.63. Italy
Avg. 0.75
Goykeres (26). €75M
24/25 P. 26. G. 27. A. 5. 1.23. Portugal
23/24 P. 50. G. 43. A. 15. 1.16. Portugal
Avg. 1.18
Kolo Muani (26). €30M
23/25 P. 54. G. 11. A. 7. 0.33. France
22/23. P. 50. G. 26. A. 17. 0.86 Germany
Avg. 0.59
Chelsea very much care. Or why do you think so many players have been given seemingly infinite contracts?
Absolutly. But I was still surprised when I checked their transfers for this and the last season and saw that they spent €620m (while selling for €270m. Saudi really saved them).And PSG care, that's why the team is full of teenagers.
Absolutly. But I was still surprised when I checked their transfers for this and the last season and saw that they spent €620m (while selling for €270m. Saudi really saved them).
Didn't the rules change in the summer, shortening the amount of contract years that can be used towards FFP? Didn't stop Chelsea handing out a contract until 2031 to Neto. The main reason seems to protect the value of the player and possibly the wage structure.Chelsea very much care. Or why do you think so many players have been given seemingly infinite contracts?
Why go back until 2020 for Osimhen but only until 2023 for Gyokeres, who is older?
Better to compare 2 latest seasons.Because i couldn’t find the info easily earlier. Anyway added it now.
Osimhen (25). €70M
24/25 P. 15. G. 12. A. 5. 1.13. Turkey
20/24 P. 133. G.76 A. 18. 0.63. Italy
Avg. 0.75
Goykeres (26). €75M
24/25 P. 26. G. 27. A. 5. 1.23. Portugal
23/24 P. 50. G. 43. A. 15. 1.16. Portugal
21/23. P. 116. G. 43. 17. 0.51. Champ.
Avg. 0.78
Kolo Muani (26). €30M
23/25 P. 54. G. 11. A. 7. 0.33. France
22/23. P. 50. G. 26. A. 17. 0.86 Germany
Avg. 0.59
Rashford is our academy graduated. It’s best to sell him for cash not for swap deal because it will help massively for the FFP. If we’re going to do swap deal, it needs to be top class goalscorer or someone that has value of £80m or something.Does Muani put in a shift at least? Depending on if he does or not and his wage demands, I'd say it's best if the club did a swap deal for Rashford.
Look at it this way, we get rid of player we will more than likely struggle to, we get a player in return who can play ball and put in a shift (not another Antony kinda way). We removed the contract of Rashford.
Like realistically, we just get rid of Rashford, we are already on a wafer thin squad depth.
Don't think any club in the world would trade Rashford for a player worth 80 million.Rashford is our academy graduated. It’s best to sell him for cash not for swap deal because it will help massively for the FFP. If we’re going to do swap deal, it needs to be top class goalscorer or someone that has value of £80m or something.