Ralf Rangnick vs Paul Mitchell

Sir Erik ten Hag

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2022
Messages
1,525
Regarding the DOF role, who has the better record and achievement between these two in Europe til now?

And I’m talking about acclaims in the DOF role. So won’t count Rangnick’s managerial stint at 04, us or the Austrian national team.
 
Regarding the DOF role, who has the better record and achievement between these two in Europe til now?

And I’m talking about acclaims in the DOF role. So won’t count Rangnick’s managerial stint at 04, us or the Austrian national team.

I'm not surprised that this thread is taking time to take off in terms of responses. Plus I don't know who Paul Mitchell is.
 
Rangnick is more accomplished than Mitchell but also 23 years his senior.

Paul Mitchell is the best candidate for Manchester United. He was at Southampton when they were the production factory for the league, he was at Spurs during their best years. And then he went to Leipzig and they had their best ever finish (3rd). And most recently he was at Monaco.

At only 42 he has so much left to offer and would be able to grow into the role.
 
Regarding the DOF role, who has the better record and achievement between these two in Europe til now?

And I’m talking about acclaims in the DOF role. So won’t count Rangnick’s managerial stint at 04, us or the Austrian national team.
Paul Mitchell has only been DoF once, at Monaco. Before that he was Head of Recruitment at MK Dons, Southampton, Spurs and RB Leipzig. At the latter he worked under Rangnick, who was the DoF at both Leipzig and also Red Bull Salzburg.

Rangnick was the main man in building the Red Bull football system, being the DoF at both Leipzig as they went from the German 4th division up to one of the stronger teams in the Bundesliga, and Salzburg as they began their domination of the Austrian league. In saying that, both teams had a significant financial advantage over all their competitors so it could definitely be said that he only did on par with expectations. It would have been a massive failure not to achieve what they did.

I'm tempted to say that I would want both here in the same way they worked together at Leipzig. Rangnick the DoF and Mitchell the Head of Recruitment. Not sure if Mitchell would go for that though since it's a step down from the role he held at Monaco, although a debate could obviously be had where the Head of Recruitment at Man Utd is in the pecking order compared to DoF at Monaco. As long as things go well it'd also give him a big advantage in taking over as DoF in the not-too-distant future since Rangnick is getting on.
 
Paul Mitchell has only been DoF once, at Monaco. Before that he was Head of Recruitment at MK Dons, Southampton, Spurs and RB Leipzig. At the latter he worked under Rangnick, who was the DoF at both Leipzig and also Red Bull Salzburg.

Rangnick was the main man in building the Red Bull football system, being the DoF at both Leipzig as they went from the German 4th division up to one of the stronger teams in the Bundesliga, and Salzburg as they began their domination of the Austrian league. In saying that, both teams had a significant financial advantage over all their competitors so it could definitely be said that he only did on par with expectations. It would have been a massive failure not to achieve what they did.

I'm tempted to say that I would want both here in the same way they worked together at Leipzig. Rangnick the DoF and Mitchell the Head of Recruitment. Not sure if Mitchell would go for that though since it's a step down from the role he held at Monaco, although a debate could obviously be had where the Head of Recruitment at Man Utd is in the pecking order compared to DoF at Monaco. As long as things go well it'd also give him a big advantage in taking over as DoF in the not-too-distant future since Rangnick is getting on.
I think that would be ideal, Mitchell wasn't exactly a big success at Monaco and Rangnick is a total package because he is also big on things like sports science, he can craft a tactical vision on which recruitment is based and he has been here before so he has the inside track on the mentality of a lot of players here.
 
If we were to appoint either, or both, people would still complain. If they were appointed even by Ratcliffe or Jassim, people would complain.

Can anyone name an alternative?
 
I'd go both, rehy worked so well, ralf knows the issues here and isn't afraid to speak out so can hit the ground running and not get indoctrinated into the glazer think like everyone else does eventually
 
I'd love to get RR back at the club.Think he got a raw deal her last time,he was never a manager especially not for MUFC but a higher role ? Absolutely.
 
This isn’t football manager where you can just rate attributes out of 20 and choose the best. It completely depends on what the people at the top of the company are trying to do. What style of football are we trying to play, what budget will we have for the next five years - it should match up with what the candidates offer or have done in the past.

Neither have experience of being successful at a very top club, so that’s a risk. Both have done well at systems based clubs who can afford to take punts on lower quality system players, with the benefit of having a good sell on value on the ones that are a success.
 
Paul Mitchell has only been DoF once, at Monaco. Before that he was Head of Recruitment at MK Dons, Southampton, Spurs and RB Leipzig. At the latter he worked under Rangnick, who was the DoF at both Leipzig and also Red Bull Salzburg.

Rangnick was the main man in building the Red Bull football system, being the DoF at both Leipzig as they went from the German 4th division up to one of the stronger teams in the Bundesliga, and Salzburg as they began their domination of the Austrian league. In saying that, both teams had a significant financial advantage over all their competitors so it could definitely be said that he only did on par with expectations. It would have been a massive failure not to achieve what they did.

I'm tempted to say that I would want both here in the same way they worked together at Leipzig. Rangnick the DoF and Mitchell the Head of Recruitment. Not sure if Mitchell would go for that though since it's a step down from the role he held at Monaco, although a debate could obviously be had where the Head of Recruitment at Man Utd is in the pecking order compared to DoF at Monaco. As long as things go well it'd also give him a big advantage in taking over as DoF in the not-too-distant future since Rangnick is getting on.

Rangnick I don't think would consider coming back to united but I'd love to see it along with Mitchell.

I think Mitchell will probably end up here. The thing that excites me about this appointment is his knowledge of French football. He should have a big database of all the top young talent and the French league has consistently been a hot bed for top talents coming to England.
 
Rangnick is an has-been and Mitchell only actual experience as a DOF was at Monaco and it wasn't good. Rangnick has the better record but he has no success at the highest level.
 
I'm sure Mitchell is only linked to us because he's the only one the press know, because he made some good signings for Southampton and Spurs years ago.
 
Rangnick I don't think would consider coming back to united but I'd love to see it along with Mitchell.

I think Mitchell will probably end up here. The thing that excites me about this appointment is his knowledge of French football. He should have a big database of all the top young talent and the French league has consistently been a hot bed for top talents coming to England.
I doubt Rangnick would come back under the current mob, but if Ratcliffe does take control of the football side of things and basically tells Rangnick that it's a new start and it's his job to rebuild our entire football structure (basically what he did at Red Bull) then I'd be surprised if he turned it down.

It's unlikely to happen though. Ratcliffe wouldn't want one of his first actions to be to hire somebody that is extremely unpopular with a significant portion of the fan base. There's so much smoke about Mitchell that I expect he probably will get the DoF role, so hopefully he'll do well.
 
Still can't believe we let Ragnick go, I'm certain we would right now have a better squad had he had a say in where the 400m went.
 
It's kinda of a grey area for me so hard to have a preference, but it's obvious that Rangnick isn't in the picture at the moment.

I did find below interview for Mitchell. Sounds alright.

 
It's kinda of a grey area for me so hard to have a preference, but it's obvious that Rangnick isn't in the picture at the moment.

I did find below interview for Mitchell. Sounds alright.



Again where is the quotes that Murtough has to explain his rationale. That was always the danger sign with the current setup, there was never quotes to distinctly say what the vision was, I put repeated post about this issue. On the basis of what Mitchell is saying in this interview it's exactly what's needed at United. An approach that isn't reactive but one that's pre determined in consideration to the clubs values and ethos. This is the type of planning that's needed at United. Not the manager running the show.

Ragnick and Mitchell would likely do well here given the circumstances just like most new owners would when compared with the Glazers. The circumstances of the new DOF is to be an improvement over the existence of Murtough / Arnold and evidently that should be easily achieved with minimal friction.
 
It's kinda of a grey area for me so hard to have a preference, but it's obvious that Rangnick isn't in the picture at the moment.

I did find below interview for Mitchell. Sounds alright.



Sounds very promising.

If you can adopt a good, sensible and efficient recruitment approach at a club like United where there's so much more money available compared to Mitchell's previous clubs, then you can build an incredible squad within a few transfer windows.
 
im sick of hearing about Rangnick. turning up, losing a load of games and concluding the team needs change was hardly a sign of genius
 
im sick of hearing about Rangnick. turning up, losing a load of games and concluding the team needs change was hardly a sign of genius
And yet here we are, the team still needs a change and we're still losing loads of games, maybe we should have kept him, 5 of the 6 players he told us to sign are now all playing top class top level football


We have players from lvg, Jose, ole and now Erik who don't work.

We've shifted pastor Fred, meanwhile he'd have been great midweek.
 
i think a lot of people are going to be disappointed with mitchell
 
im sick of hearing about Rangnick. turning up, losing a load of games and concluding the team needs change was hardly a sign of genius

Basically just described us right now.
 
And yet here we are, the team still needs a change and we're still losing loads of games, maybe we should have kept him, 5 of the 6 players he told us to sign are now all playing top class top level football


We have players from lvg, Jose, ole and now Erik who don't work.

We've shifted pastor Fred, meanwhile he'd have been great midweek.

How we get on 12 months after his world breaking analysis gotten from any random poster on Redcafe.
 
If we were to appoint either, or both, people would still complain. If they were appointed even by Ratcliffe or Jassim, people would complain.

Can anyone name an alternative?
Dan Ashworth is the best around imo. Good luck signing him though
 
How we get on 12 months after his world breaking analysis gotten from any random poster on Redcafe.

There is a significant difference from someone saying those things with his pedigree in the game, his level of respect from top level managers and DoFs, and someone who had spent six months with all full access to all aspects of the club...

... to someone on the caf.
 
im sick of hearing about Rangnick. turning up, losing a load of games and concluding the team needs change was hardly a sign of genius

This. To add, the guy believed he would have no issues managing United because he had managed a 'big club' in Schalke, thought he would have an easy time with Ronaldo because he once got Ebbe Sand scoring for him, and spent as much time on holiday in Barbados as he did at Carrington during his tenure. He is to United as Trump is to America - gets a bye for insanity because a large section of the support go "but he said what I feel." I mean, he even got his intel from a bloke in Russia...
 
Paul Mitchell has only been DoF once, at Monaco. Before that he was Head of Recruitment at MK Dons, Southampton, Spurs and RB Leipzig. At the latter he worked under Rangnick, who was the DoF at both Leipzig and also Red Bull Salzburg.

Rangnick was the main man in building the Red Bull football system, being the DoF at both Leipzig as they went from the German 4th division up to one of the stronger teams in the Bundesliga, and Salzburg as they began their domination of the Austrian league. In saying that, both teams had a significant financial advantage over all their competitors so it could definitely be said that he only did on par with expectations. It would have been a massive failure not to achieve what they did.

I'm tempted to say that I would want both here in the same way they worked together at Leipzig. Rangnick the DoF and Mitchell the Head of Recruitment. Not sure if Mitchell would go for that though since it's a step down from the role he held at Monaco, although a debate could obviously be had where the Head of Recruitment at Man Utd is in the pecking order compared to DoF at Monaco. As long as things go well it'd also give him a big advantage in taking over as DoF in the not-too-distant future since Rangnick is getting on.
I totally agree with you there @MadDogg . Even in jobs that deal with huge sums of money (I was a bond trader in a previous life), people can't just commit their employer to buying assets literally worth hundreds of millions of pounds without a strong process and transparency. I think it's just too great a responsibility to have that in the role profile of the head coach/manager. And this season's performance and the questionable recruitment of players has highlighted exactly why we need a separation and a credible DOF system.
 
There is a significant difference from someone saying those things with his pedigree in the game, his level of respect from top level managers and DoFs, and someone who had spent six months with all full access to all aspects of the club...

... to someone on the caf.

Not going to lie. If I go to the best stake cooker in the world. He best not cook it like how I do at home. Otherwise I want to be paid what he’s paid.

What Ralf said as much as it was refreshing to hear in the media it was B.S from somebody that we was paying to change our club.
 
Paul Mitchell has only been DoF once, at Monaco. Before that he was Head of Recruitment at MK Dons, Southampton, Spurs and RB Leipzig. At the latter he worked under Rangnick, who was the DoF at both Leipzig and also Red Bull Salzburg.

Rangnick was the main man in building the Red Bull football system, being the DoF at both Leipzig as they went from the German 4th division up to one of the stronger teams in the Bundesliga, and Salzburg as they began their domination of the Austrian league. In saying that, both teams had a significant financial advantage over all their competitors so it could definitely be said that he only did on par with expectations. It would have been a massive failure not to achieve what they did.

I'm tempted to say that I would want both here in the same way they worked together at Leipzig. Rangnick the DoF and Mitchell the Head of Recruitment. Not sure if Mitchell would go for that though since it's a step down from the role he held at Monaco, although a debate could obviously be had where the Head of Recruitment at Man Utd is in the pecking order compared to DoF at Monaco. As long as things go well it'd also give him a big advantage in taking over as DoF in the not-too-distant future since Rangnick is getting on.

This with Edwards as external consultant
 
This Wreck-It Ralf nonsense is like a turd that won't flush. Would rather bring Solskjaer back than have that fraud anywhere near the club
 
I think we should just put them into a two round contest:

1. WWE style smack talking
2. UFC style fight

As Harry Hill would say “there’s only one way to find out, FIGHT”

In all seriousness though I’d LOVE to see Michael Edwards come in as Sporting Director and Paul Mitchell as Head Of Recruitment, leave ETH as head coach and nowhere near transfers but if he doesn’t work out as head coach bring someone in who coaches the way our Sporting Director and Head Of Recruitment wants us to play.
 
There is a significant difference from someone saying those things with his pedigree in the game, his level of respect from top level managers and DoFs, and someone who had spent six months with all full access to all aspects of the club...

... to someone on the caf.
Random caf member would probably have managed better results than Ralf. Absolutely atrocious reign as caretaker manger.
 
im sick of hearing about Rangnick. turning up, losing a load of games and concluding the team needs change was hardly a sign of genius

People also tend to ignore that Rangnick praised a bunch of players that are near-universally considered "not good enough for United." Maguire, McTominay, Fred.