Oo0AahCantona
Full Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2014
- Messages
- 5,411
Still think he's our long term right back, only player i would take over him would probably be coleman although he would cost 20 mil
Rafael's been free from injury for what, nearly a month? I don't know if he saw any action with the reserves/U-21s but given a time and a little luck he'll be back to the influential player the team had earlier on this season.
How he picks out Rooney here must be down to his concealed psychic abilities then.
I would have had a wet dream over Rafael setting a goal up for Mata.I love him and if Mata had finished his chance everyone would be buzzing about him.
Why do we always need such posts that make sense after all the drama queens before have spoken?Give him a break. Just returned and had to play with tired players. He was not good today though. Still created our best chance of the half. Mata skied it.
Give him a break. Just returned and had to play with tired players. He was not good today though. Still created our best chance of the half. Mata skied it.
And roles were completely reversed first half. It's not an alien concept for home teams to grow into games and away to tire.I honestly dislike this 'tired' players excuse. I know we started the same starting 11, but Spurs should've been tired as well and they had more energy in the second half. They're no excuses for our shitty second half performances.
And roles were completely reversed first half. It's not an alien concept for home teams to grow into games and away to tire.
All our young and talented defenders have terrible injury records, and we'll have to wait and see how Shaw will do. It'll be another 5 years before he is physically fully grown and if you look at how much Jones, Rafael and Smalling have struggled and still do, well I just hope that will not apply to Shaw.
I don't really see the problem with Rafael, the moment he is fit and gets into form he will definitely add a completely other dimension to our right hand side. He already had some excellent moments this season. Antionio has done a great job too covering for him. Coleman is a good player but not as good as Rafael. Plus bringing a new right back in might mean Valencia has to leave, surely Van Gaal doesn't see him as a winger (especially with Young doing very well attackingly, he could play on both wings)?
If we bring in a new right back, then Rafael will leave not Valencia.
And for me Coleman is currently better.
If we bring in a new right back, then Rafael will leave not Valencia.
And for me Coleman is currently better.
All our young and talented defenders have terrible injury records, and we'll have to wait and see how Shaw will do. It'll be another 5 years before he is physically fully grown and if you look at how much Jones, Rafael and Smalling have struggled and still do, well I just hope that will not apply to Shaw.
I don't really see the problem with Rafael, the moment he is fit and gets into form he will definitely add a completely other dimension to our right hand side. He already had some excellent moments this season. Antionio has done a great job too covering for him. Coleman is a good player but not as good as Rafael. Plus bringing a new right back in might mean Valencia has to leave, surely Van Gaal doesn't see him as a winger (especially with Young doing very well attackingly, he could play on both wings)?
Completely disagree there.
Van Gaal trusts Rafael at right back, he only trusts Valencia at RWB. He's not going to sell our only other player capable of playing RB in a back four.
I do think Rafael is a good bet for "shock" transfer though this summer. I can see us buying two right backs and moving him on. It won't be a straight choice between Valencia or Rafael to leave though as they play different positions.
What's the point of keeping a player who can't stay fit?
You seem to forgotten that Van Gaal played Valencia at right back vs City and we played 4 at the back that game. He's only gone to 5 due to Young being there too. If Shaw was fit, then I'm sure we'd be playing 4 at the back.
Like I said, if we sign another right back then it perhaps signals the end for Rafael rather than Valencia.
And look who was an absolute country mile out of position and left Smalling completely exposed to get his second yellow. He hasn't played RB since.
He played right back against Palace and Stoke. And has played right back under Moyes and Fergie in the past, so let's not make out its alien to him unlike Young.
If Rafael stays fit then we have no reason to sign another fullback. As Valencia could provide cover for the few games. The only reason we need to sign a new fullback is if Rafael can't stay fit.
He played right back against Palace and Stoke. And has played right back under Moyes and Fergie in the past, so let's not make out its alien to him unlike Young.
If Rafael stays fit then we have no reason to sign another fullback. As Valencia could provide cover for the few games. The only reason we need to sign a new fullback is if Rafael can't stay fit.
We had our 4 first choice centrebacks out against Palace so had no choice while we played with 3 at the back (Carrick CCB) and Valencia at RWB against Stoke.
Jones and Smalling were also played to death at RB by Moyes and Fergie yet Van Gaal would never dream of it so I don't get your point?
Even then we might not need to sign a new one. Rojo, Shaw and Blind for the left back, Rafael, Jones, Valencia/Young for right back could be in Van Gaals head too, depending on fitness/injuries of the squad. In an away game vs. a top 4 team or against a good European side I could see him wanting Phil Jones at right back over Valencia for instance.
If Rafael can't stay fit, then we need to sign another right back.
This changing the defence every game you may like just for Rafael. But I'm not a fan of. Chelsea have the best defence because they never change it. We will never get that consistency if likes of Rafael can't stay fit. I don't care how talented they are. We shouldn't have to change the defence every game.
Our best teams under Fergie everyone knew what the back 4 was.
Did you read my original post? I said we need another right back, if he doesn't feel Rafael is a reliable option for right back he will buy two right backs. It's not a choice between Valencia or Rafael as Valencia is not a right back as Van Gaal has stressed recently.
He played right back against Palace and Stoke. And has played right back under Moyes and Fergie in the past, so let's not make out its alien to him unlike Young.
If Rafael stays fit then we have no reason to sign another fullback. As Valencia could provide cover for the few games. The only reason we need to sign a new fullback is if Rafael can't stay fit.
Depending on how durable Rafael is for the remainder of the season [i have no qualms about him regaining his form], an ideal signing would be a decent albeit somewhat ageing defender who can fill in at both RB and CB. Wes Brown with a case of Benjamin Button.
I did and I said we only need one right back. Not waste money on another one. Considering Valencia has played there since the Man City game.
Yeah and unfair to pick out one mistake against City, when Smalling himself was an idiot for diving in like that when on a yellow.
I really don't get this line of thought. Why would we limit ourselves to either Valencia or a "decent albeit somewhat ageing defender" as cover for Rafael? I don't see what the advantage of that is as opposed to actually signing a top quality RB.
Take Azpilicueta at Chelsea as example. Roughly the same age as Rafael, far less injury prone and (by some distance) a better player. Chelsea could have easily brought in a "decent" option as back up for him yet instead they went for a top quality 28 year old La Liga winner to provide genuine competition/back up. Why the hell wouldn't we try to do the same with our team? It would leave us in a far, far stronger position than signing a decent veteran or sticking with an out of position winger.
I'd get it if money was an issue but that doesn't seem to be at all the case atm. So why settle?
I really don't get this line of thought. Why would we limit ourselves to either Valencia or a "decent albeit somewhat ageing defender" as cover for Rafael? I don't see what the advantage of that is as opposed to actually signing a top quality RB.
Take Azpilicueta at Chelsea as example. Roughly the same age as Rafael, far less injury prone and (by some distance) a better player. Chelsea could have easily brought in a "decent" option as back up for him yet instead they went for a top quality 28 year old La Liga winner to provide genuine competition/back up. Why the hell wouldn't we try to do the same with our team? It would leave us in a far, far stronger position than signing a decent veteran or sticking with an out of position winger.
I'd get it if money was an issue but that doesn't seem to be at all the case atm. So why settle?
He played one game there when we had four centrebacks out.
Asked about Valencia and Young Van Gaal replied:
“As wingbacks, not as fullbacks, because now am more or less obliged to play with wingbacks because the real fullbacks, Shaw and Rafael Da Silva were not fit enough and that’s not good, I have to select what I want and now I am forced to select and for a manager that’s not so good.”
That tells you everything you need to know.
Right on cue, Jamie Jackson has been following you on the caf, even got the price right:Still think he's our long term right back, only player i would take over him would probably be coleman although he would cost 20 mil
Right on cue, Jamie Jackson has been following you on the caf, even got the price right:
http://www.theguardian.com/football...united-seamus-coleman-transfer-target-everton
No quotes from van Gaal about Coleman.