VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
Most recent reports suggest the fee will be £31M.
I hope we snap him up at the value ASAP.
I hope we snap him up at the value ASAP.
Just because a player is doing better elsewhere doesn't mean you'd take him here, e.g. would you take Neuer over De gea right now? I wouldn't..
Dude, no one is saying that Costa is not having a great season so far, but lets not forget that he is playing as a focal point of a 4-5-1 at a very dominant Chelsea team with the most creative midfield players behind him. Falcao on the other hand didn't have a pre-season with us, is returning from serous injury, struggled with fitness, half of his minutes are in very short cameos, plays in a defensively set-up 3-5-2 and still managed to produce almost as many goals/assist per minute as Costa. I think Falcao is the better player and once he returns to 100% he will surpass him in the EPL the same way he did when both of them played at Atletico.In that case why ever sign anyone?
And yeah, Falcao's showing thus far is comparable to DDG's form isn't it?
Diego Costa is a world class bully of a striker who's taken to the PL like a duck to water, if we had him spearheading our attack we'd be better off than we are now. Anyone suggesting they'd reject an immediate swap deal of Falcao for Costa is talking utter nonsense to borderline troll levels, or is deluded.
Good point and with Arsenal and Liverpool sniffing around for a striker that would be devastating if we payed for his rehab and they reap the rewards!!!Plenty of people made the point that we paid too much for RVP in the first place.
And again Falcao has circumstances of his own, A) not fully fit B) not at his best, may not physically be able to be C) he's done at Monaco. They tried to get Real Madrid and when that didnt work out, they made sure he went to United. If we dont sign him, he's not going back to Monaco he's going to the highest bidder that he's going to accept playing for (he'll obviously have to give the go-ahead). Its more complicated than having a year on his contract, but he's clearly done at Monaco and is just as available as RVP was.
What do his numbers prior to his injury have to do with anything? Do you have proof that it won't effect him? That crystal ball must be really handy.
25 goals is just a more realistic (but still extremely hopeful/positive) expectation given he has to adapt to a new league and is unlikely to be 100% what he was before. Thats a lot of goals
I think Falcao is the better player and if he returns to 100% he will surpass him in the EPL the same way he did when both of them played at Atletico.
Most recent reports suggest the fee will be £31M.
I hope we snap him up at the value ASAP.
So do I.
Hows Balotelli working out?
Not well. Why?
I thought you were suggesting Falcao has been a flop, or that at £31 million he would be over priced. If you were saying that Liverpool should bid £31 million for him then I've misinterpreted what you said.
I'm saying that £31m is a terrible price for Falcao given his age and clear decline caused by his injuries. Not sure what Balotelli has got to do with that.
I'm saying that £31m is a terrible price for Falcao given his age and clear decline caused by his injuries. Not sure what Balotelli has got to do with that.
I'll have one of each please.if I had a say i would do everything in my power to grab reus instead if it was a possibility. although im sure we have yet to see the best of falcao.
I'm saying that £31m is a terrible price for Falcao given his age and clear decline caused by his injuries. Not sure what Balotelli has got to do with that.
£31M is a terrible price for one of the best number 9's in the world. Ok then.
What clear decline? He is just finding his way back from a serious injury and acclimatising to a new league yet has contributed 3 goals and 3 assists in 7 starts. If he hasn't improved by this time next year then yes he has declined in comparison to his Athletico days but to say there has been a "clear decline" based on a handful of performances is just laughable really. I mentioned Balotelli because ye paid £16 million for a complete dud yet you think we would be mad to pay less than half that for an infinitely better player in Falcao.
This. I only rate Suarez and Aguero higher.
Exactly, and before 2014, Falcao was rated higher then both.
£31M is a terrible price for one of the best number 9's in the world. Ok then.
He's not one of the best number 9s in the world any more, that's the point.
It's clear to anyone who watched him regularly at Atleti, he's a complete shadow of that player.He's not one of the best number 9s in the world any more, that's the point.
Ya while he was out injured they both improved rapidly.
Falcao: 604 minutes played, 3 goals + 3 assists; 101 minutes per goal or assistSo do I.
Falcao: 604 minutes played, 3 goals + 3 assists; 101 minutes per goal or assist
Balotelli: 737 minutes played, 0 goals + 0 assists; infinity minutes per goal or assist (737 / 0 = infinity)