- Joined
- May 19, 2019
- Messages
- 248
Sanchez, I didn’t get excited at all , he’d been crap for Arsenal for months before we got him , blatantly signed for the money, had failure written all over it
If we signed Fabinho and Mahrez and Liverpool and city signed Matic and Sanchez….they would have probably been great for the last 3 years and Fabinho and Mahrez would have been underwhelming. The coaching plays a huge part in their success.
None will ever be more nonsensical than Van De Beek. Big money on a player who plays in the same position as (at the time) comfortably our best player who happens to never be injured. All while we had a gaping hole 20 yards down the pitch.
Feb 17 after a 0:0 against Hull.Mourinho wanting Maguire when he was at Leicester always bugged me because he got to see him when he was at Hull City. Why didn't he go for him then if he say potential.
If I could see it how can paid people at the club not. Baffling.Is that Harry Maguire worth a look for us? Or is he just a game raiser. Has dominated Ibra and the rest of our attack for 3 games.
Funny enough we wouldn’t look worse off if we never signed anyone since LVG.None of the LVG transfers seemed to make any sense whatsoever
Shaw and Herrera were basically signed before LVG I think. Remove all signings after that, swap Blind for Evans, Rafael at right back, Zaha for Depay, Martial for Welbeck and you're right we'd be no worse.Funny enough we wouldn’t look worse off if we never signed anyone since LVG.
DDG
?? Blind. Jones/Smalling. Shaw
Herrera. Parreira
Rashford. Lingard. Depay
Martial
This team hasn’t improved much since then if at all.
Nah that's Van der Vaart, who is not a cnut incidentally. Buttner is just from a white trash neighbourhood.Wasn't he a gypsy? I remember having an argument with Dynamite Dutch on the former Maxxed/Fbtz forum when I said after the wigan match (think he scored 2 goals) that he was absolute shit.
Adult Disneyland.Feb 17 after a 0:0 against Hull.
If I could see it how can paid people at the club not. Baffling.
They probably wouldn't have done well for us either.
If Sancho had gone to City or Pool I think he'd have done much better this season. I'm sure we'd be crying look what we could've had if Sancho went elsewhere likewise Mane and many more. We make many bad signings but also can't utilize good players properly.
Ah some magical captain hindsight stuff.
Why did we buy (player that hasn't done well), instead of (player that has done well).
What were we thinking!
Going for Mkhi over Mane. Especially seeing Mane tear up big six teams whenever he would face them with Southampton.
- Rojo over Van Dijk (we had the Dutch manager in charge!)
- Darmian when Valencia was clearly better, after letting Rafael go for next to nothing
- Letting Evans go for next to nothing
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-news-transfers-louis-4314219Rojo was in 2014. van Dijk was an unknown playing for Celtic back then. He joined Liverpool 4 years later from Soton. This is a wrong, illogical example. That's like saying why didn't we get Rio in 1998, how could we be so stupid.
Sanchez made some sense if we were going to play him on the right or as a striker (both positions where he'd had some success for Arsenal). The fact Mourinho bought him in and instantly just played him on the left instead of Martial (who had been our form attacker for the previous couple of months) was an absolute joke and was where I really started giving up on Mourinho.Sanchez was IMO the worst transfer in recent history. Massive wages and displaced Martial who was having a pretty good season. Yet another LW when we had a non existent RW. Just showed how idiotic and naive we were ( possibly are )
Di Maria was a fine purchase - but he never got in with him and I'm not sure he actually wanted to be here.
We mishandled him badly though.
Martial was another good purchase at the time, he had a great year with him.
Sancho is somebody who can be excellent on the right and he made sense in a lot of ways. Needs a system like all players to get the best out of him. The reason it's panned out as it has is because Rashford turned absolute garbage this season, which means LW was a gaping hole all of a sudden. Which was fine too, as Sancho can be the creator opposite to Rashford if he's on the right, or opposite to Greenwood if he's on the left. Then Greenwood had to go and be a scumbag and be cancelled as a footballer, so we are left with Sancho as our only winger who sometimes performs and the next best is .. Elanga? So might as well put Sancho where he can be more of an individual, as either way we aren't getting anything from the opposite flank to him.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-news-transfers-louis-4314219
An article from September 2014 so hardly unknown, especially so for the Dutch manager. We paid £18m for Rojo (+Nani another who should never have been sold at the time) because LVG liked the look of him in one game.
Along with the obvious ones that have been mentioned, signing Pellistri and Amad for 30-40m combined was absolutely mental when we could have signed a DM.
There are lots of transfers which AT THAT moment were perfectly logical and we (fans) were over the moon back then. It is easy to be smart in hindsight
I still wonder what the hell was going on during Summer 2013, why we waited until the last minute to buy Fellaini when he was cheaper earlier in the window, why we thought Baines was good enough to step up to United, what that ‘urgent transfer business’ Woodward left the Australia Tour was, why Moyes took a fecking month off before doing anything, why he vetoed Thiago Alcantara allegedly, him seemingly on a wild goose chase for Fabregas etc.
Also the Winter 2014 window where we bought Mata, despite already having a considerable number of players who played in his best position. That seems like a what the feck moment in hindsight. Panic buy?
It might have been a different scenario had Rashford showed anything close to good form on either flank though.To me it looks like Rangnink at least has preferred to have Sancho on the left when both him and Rashford has started.
Regarding your examples. Yeah, those were huge mistakes. Jose wanted proven dmc with who he worked. Mahrez was on Ed maybe. He didn't want to pay 70 mil i believeHence the premise of the thread being to see which transfers people were apprehensive about at the time, and also why I mentioned the ones I didn't really understand. The thread isn't an attempt at being smart in hindsight - quite the contrary
one also has to account that people are different/will have different views - thus saying "fans were over the moon about x transfer back then" really doesn't mean much to this thread as I was asking for individual opinions.
the reasoning for some of your views on transfers is also "???" to me. i.e; "Sanchez. City wanted him. RW". Sanchez was not a RW and City wanting a player doesn't mean United should be in for them - Yes, he was still generally seen as one of the best in the league but he had been in poor form for awhile
there are other instances of reasoning/supposed justification in your list that's just baffling to me, and I just don't have the energy to engage with. Respectfully
Sad but true. It wasn’t the players it was the system (or lack of) and the negativity around the placeThere's more wrong than individual players. If Man City had signed Sanchez instead of Mahrez and Liverpool Matic over Fabinho then both those players would have done better than with us as City and Liverpool are functioning teams with great managers. Similarly Mahrez and Fabinho would probably have underwhelmed here.
There's more wrong than individual players. If Man City had signed Sanchez instead of Mahrez and Liverpool Matic over Fabinho then both those players would have done better than with us as City and Liverpool are functioning teams with great managers. Similarly Mahrez and Fabinho would probably have underwhelmed here.