beingshe7don
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Messages
- 2,735
Verratti pls
I have my doubts on Verrati...
Verratti pls
That's the key question. Presumably, seeing as this is done on their audited P&L, they don't need to have the actual cash, just the sale. It isn't a question of 'cash' is it, it's a question of operating loss?Do they need to get 60M in their banks before Jun 30. I guess all they need to show is a financial transaction for that period.
Does it matter if the actual revenue is realized later?
Why do they need to sell players? Good idea to post a link!
Paris St-Germain need to sell 60m euros (£52.9m) worth of players by the end of June, to comply with financial fair play (FFP) rules.
Cheers. Seems you’re more than prompt, high quality gifs, ey?
They're going to sell Krychowiak,Odsonne,Pastore and Trapp.
That's already 40M of players which is what they need.
I wonder if Draxler could play on the right
I believe ffp works by taking the average spent of 3 years. So this gives flexibilty and room to overspend one summer then underspend the next to make up for it. Thats the situation at PSG at the moment.
There will be no firesale, €40m are easy to find. The smart thing would be to get a fair deal for a good player in a position you need quickly, which isn't that easy nowadays. The vultures hoping to get a bargain with miserable offers will end up with nothing.Good chance for us to get bargains: They are forced to sell players, I'm sure most of the clubs will be smart enough to make low offers.
Of course they are. UEFA are looking at the books for the 15/16-17/18 three years frame. Neymar and Mbappé were done in 17/18 and went into the books for the year. It's why they currently need €60m profits to close the 17/18 books without failing FFP controls.So many inaccuracies. It's €40m not €60m.
And the Neymar & Mbappe deals are NOT included in the evaluation period but will be year.
To be precise Neymar and Mbappé weren't included in the 2015, 2016 and 2017 exercises that were just cleared, their wages and transfer amortization start in 2017/2018, that's why €40m are still needed despite already selling Matuidi, Augustin, Aurier and Lucas.So many inaccuracies. It's €40m not €60m.
And the Neymar & Mbappe deals are NOT included in the evaluation period but will be year.
Probably harsher than the first time. I don't think it's in UEFA interest to exclude PSG from CL (although wouldn't be that crazy if the whole €40m are still missing) but I'd expect heavy fine + transfer limitation + monitoring of accounts + limitation of CL squad + point deduction in CL group stage for a few years.I know it isn't feasible, but what would happen if no one wanted to buy? Paltry fine?
Quite a lot of tweets from journos saying the opposite, fwiw.Of course they are. UEFA are looking at the books for the 15/16-17/18 three years frame. Neymar and Mbappé were done in 17/18 and went into the books for the year. It's why they currently need €60m profits to close the 17/18 books without failing FFP controls.
I guess a visit to the local confessional will do then.UEFA decision to close FFP investigation into PSG does NOT absolve them over the Neymar and Mbappe transfers.
The problem they have is the clubs usually pay for the players in several years. Not a lot of teams could 30-40m in cash in one shot. Think the bigger clubs have a shot at getting few players if they could offer immediate cash
I guess a visit to the local confessional will do then.
Meanwhile:
That would make it only €30m to go.
That makes no sense. UEFA are monitoring the last 3 seasons. Including the one that just ended. So there's no way the Neymar and Mbappé deals haven't figured into the accounts they looked at for FFP
There will be no firesale, €40m are easy to find. The smart thing would be to get a fair deal for a good player in a position you need quickly, which isn't that easy nowadays. The vultures hoping to get a bargain with miserable offers will end up with nothing.
PSG have about €400m of assets between the 15 players they're willing to let go and only €40m to recoup. There's 15/20 clubs able to buy one of the €40m+ players and about 50 able to buy a €20m one, that's potentially dozens of offers and only the most interesting will be accepted. You're unlikely to get anything with insutingly low offers and the main thing you will achieve is degrading the club relationship with PSG, just what happened between MUFC and Inter last summer for Perisic.Ethically, that would happen. But imagine next: everyone knows that if PSG doesn't sell, they are in really deep trouble. Now, ignore that this is a football club and imagine it as an enterprise/company (which actually is):
Why would the market buy it on a price tag for actives that have no other choice than to be sold? Why would a company be stupid enough to do that?
PSG have about €400m of assets between the 15 players they're willing to let go and only €40m to recoup. There's 15/20 clubs able to buy one of the €40m+ players and about 50 able to buy a €20m one, that's potentially dozens of offers and only the most interesting will be accepted. You're unlikely to get anything with insutingly low offers and the main thing you will achieve is degrading the club relationship with PSG, just what happened between MUFC and Inter last summer for Perisic.
I agree that the clubs most directly in competition or even at war with PSG right now have little incentive to bail out PSG early for example by buying Di Maria for €40m.
PSG's financial year has not closed yet. Think it closes in August if I recall correctly. Which means the last set of published audited results they have are are 16-17.That makes no sense. UEFA are monitoring the last 3 seasons. Including the one that just ended. So there's no way the Neymar and Mbappé deals haven't figured into the accounts they looked at for FFP
PSG's financial year has not closed yet. Think it closes in August if I recall correctly. Which means the last set of published audited results they have are are 16-17.
Thanks. So the first Neymar amortization should then be included in that set of results? Mbappe shouldn't be other than his wagesIt closes this month and they already provided this year's records in may, they have to provide an updated version by June 30.
Brash Real Madrid pursuits of PSG players are conspicuous by their absence also.IMHO, no one will hostilize PSG simply because they are the best buyers on the transfer market, and no club wishes to antagonize them. Except Real Madrid, they don't care who they antagonize, even their own federation
Thanks. So the first Neymar amortization should then be included in that set of results? Mbappe shouldn't be other than his wages