I believe Redcafe may have the balance wrong on the new thread/old thread issue, and the Manchester United Forum provides some evidence for this.
When I was in the Newbs, I did a little personal research, comparing activity rates on the Newbs, the Liverpool FC Forum on RAWK, and the mains Manchester United Forum. Iirc, there were 10 times more posts/hr. on the first two forums. The 7th or 8th thread down from the top in the mains might go 6 hours without a single post!
I don't know if things have changed since. More Newbs have been promoted, so that has probably helped. (Reading the United forum, it's noticeable that most contributors have only been members for 2/3 years. Senior posters seem to have little to say about football).
But without going to extremes, I think new threads could be more encouraged. I remember drawing an analogy with supermarkets in the past.
They regularly change the layout of their shelves, not for functionality, but because customers are enlivened by the new.
Caftards are no different. The appearance of the same old, same old, has a depressing psychological effect. An interesting question on Valencia, for instance, in the
Anthony Valencia thread, might draw 2 responses, if lucky. Pose the same question in a new thread, and it will get at least 50.
I understand mods want to maintain some order and stability. The Newbs was chaotic when I was there. While you were down at the pub, threads were born, danced their few hours in the sun, and died.
I just wonder if a better middle ground couldn't be found.
(I know the above comments aren't particularly constructive. How is the middle ground to be found? etc. But I had to get it off my chest.)