GM K
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2017
- Messages
- 4,601
I know but he really just needs to leave there ASAP. It’s starting to hurt too much.
I know but he really just needs to leave there ASAP. It’s starting to hurt too much.
Wonder when's the last time we truly destroyed a big team. 4-2 against City under LVG?
Well, the scoreline wasn't big but Chelsea got totally outclassed at Old Trafford in 16/17.Wonder when's the last time we truly destroyed a big team. 4-2 against City under LVG?
Wonder when's the last time we truly destroyed a big team. 4-2 against City under LVG?
Well, the scoreline wasn't big but Chelsea got totally outclassed at Old Trafford in 16/17.
Arsenal had more possession, more passes and 8 shots.
Auba only big chance, which he missed given offside incorrectly.
Arsenal made a couple of awful defensive errors and got punished.
Two highly questionable penalties against and one not given for them.
Those two in combination cost them a heavy defeat. In general play they weren't awful.
Thought you were joking, our players needed better Coaching to not look cowards like you say and attacking mind to not look spineless too. So that's why I hope we will be challenging again soon enough.Man United?
Thought you were joking, our players needed better Coaching to not look cowards like you say and attacking mind to not look spineless too. So that's why I hope we will be challenging again soon enough.
Yeah, but that's been the case for a lot of Arsenal's defeats down the years. General play OK, defensive errors = costly.Arsenal had more possession, more passes and 8 shots.
Auba only big chance, which he missed given offside incorrectly.
Arsenal made a couple of awful defensive errors and got punished.
Two highly questionable penalties against and one not given for them.
Those two in combination cost them a heavy defeat. In general play they weren't awful.
Media would have eaten him alive for today's loss of he were managing us. Not saying Emery is a bad manager but his tactics today were shocking, no defensive organization nor any game plan.We wouldn't have sacked him either.
Unless he started doing a Mourinho and throwing everyone else under the bus.
Arsenal had more possession, more passes and 8 shots.
Auba only big chance, which he missed given offside incorrectly.
Arsenal made a couple of awful defensive errors and got punished.
Two highly questionable penalties against and one not given for them.
Those two in combination cost them a heavy defeat. In general play they weren't awful.
To be fair to Klopp, he learnt that his headless chicken football wouldn't win him a title in England so has become more pragmatic and defensive.
To be fair to Klopp, he learnt that his headless chicken football wouldn't win him a title in England so has become more pragmatic and defensive.
This is just a fallacy. Klopp's championship winning teams in Germany were very good defensively, conceding 22 and 25 goals respectively. In the first championship season that was by far a Bundesliga best, with the next best team conceding 39, and in the other season, the best defense conceded 22.
Klopp's teams were more rounded than people give them credit for.
Yeah but there's no way we sell him eitherCuneyt Cakir was fantastic for you lot, really good in Europe.
Klopp will be stupid to leave Liverpool for Madrid if you ask me. He's in the middle of an interesting project at Anfield and they love him there. Madrid, as usual, remains highly unpredictable for any manager. And you just have to wonder about the extent of resources and time needed to rebuild their squad.
In fairness to Liverpool, the 13/14 season they were never more than 3 points clear of City without City having games in hand. Tbh, United's 8 point lead with 6 to go was a bigger mess up than Liverpool in 13/14. Its just funny because of the slip thing.
He bottled it at 5-1, I don’t see why he wouldn’t bottle it when it would actually affect the result of the game.
To be fair to Klopp, he learnt that his headless chicken football wouldn't win him a title in England so has become more pragmatic and defensive.
Since Liverpool is winning this, can they just make it about 5-1? Cut the goals difference for us a lot more.
Did you watch the game or just read some stats?Arsenal had more possession, more passes and 8 shots.
Auba only big chance, which he missed given offside incorrectly.
Arsenal made a couple of awful defensive errors and got punished.
Two highly questionable penalties against and one not given for them.
Those two in combination cost them a heavy defeat. In general play they weren't awful.
Do you know what a dive is? Its someone deliberately throwing themselves on the ground.. did Salah do that? Or are you legit trying to say the force of the tackle put him down?
He was kicked in the back of the leg so foul and peno.
Then he dived on the ground to make sure it was given.
It's not hard to follow really.
Not really. Just try understanding the meaning of a dive.
To clarify , you don't have to fall down to get a penalty. If you are "fouled" in the box you get a penalty and not going down.
Nothing funny about that statement. It's banal if anything.
100% but he could easily have stayed on his feet, just because it was a foul doesn't mean he didn't dive.
Arsenal had more possession, more passes and 8 shots.
Auba only big chance, which he missed given offside incorrectly.
Arsenal made a couple of awful defensive errors and got punished.
Two highly questionable penalties against and one not given for them.
Those two in combination cost them a heavy defeat. In general play they weren't awful.
A dive is when you fall down of your own volition, rather than because you were forced to by a foul. What you're portraying, feigning, simulating there is not just contact, but a kind of contact that would bring you down.Can't believe I found people that are actually defending that. Let me spell it out in a bit more detail:
This what he the original statement by some poster was.
The bold part felt ridiculous because it said that even a genuinely fouled player can be deemed to have dived. Which is ridiculous because the formal definition of a dive (called simulation in the rulebooks) literally says that a player is guilty of simulation if he pretends to be fouled or exaggerates an injury.
Geez!
It shows how much the right mentality matters. Mané could have gotten a red card after 7 minutes, he wasn't ready. Arsenal were all over Liverpool, intercepting passes in Liverpool's third. A goal up, instead of riding the confidence you get Lucas Torreira and some seriously sloppy play from the defense and it's completely turned around. Xhaka was furious at his own players and lost his head after that which meant that Arsenal's midfield was also dead and Liverpool got their groove back way too quickly for Arsenal to handle.This is actually correct. We actually looked a bit shaky and our passing was sloppy, unlike the last 3-4 matches. And Arsenal were getting at our defenders fairly regularly. They are quite good going forward. Their defence was all over the place though. But wouldn't say the scoreline flattered us, we wasted quite a few gilt-edged chances too.
Yup. Aptly put I guess. Up until their first goal, Arsenal had the upper hand I guess. But then Firmino's 2 goals in a matter of minutes and Arsenal never recovered.It shows how much the right mentality matters. Mané could have gotten a red card after 7 minutes, he wasn't ready. Arsenal were all over Liverpool, intercepting passes in Liverpool's third. A goal up, instead of riding the confidence you get Lucas Torreira and some seriously sloppy play from the defense and it's completely turned around. Xhaka was furious at his own players and lost his head after that which meant that Arsenal's midfield was also dead and Liverpool got their groove back way too quickly for Arsenal to handle.
Still agree with him.Can't believe I found people that are actually defending that. Let me spell it out in a bit more detail:
This what he the original statement by some poster was.
The bold part felt ridiculous because it said that even a genuinely fouled player can be deemed to have dived. Which is ridiculous because the formal definition of a dive (called simulation in the rulebooks) literally says that a player is guilty of simulation if he pretends to be fouled or exaggerates an injury.
Geez!
A dive is when you fall down of your own volition, rather than because you were forced to by a foul. What you're portraying, feigning, simulating there is not just contact, but a kind of contact that would bring you down.
It's fascinating that this is opaque to you.
I've a feeling Palace are going to get at least a point versus Chelsea today.
I hope not! Liverpool need a challenge.I have a feeling City's misery will continue today.