Jibbs
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2013
- Messages
- 2,238
That’s it… I just found out Schick is a huge United fan. It’s got to be him.
While Sancho right now is doing well at left wing, he is comfortable to play on right wing at a high level. If we can get a natural forward, we have more freedom to utilize a goal scoring attacker on left wing, which is Rashford, or Martial if the new manager want him to stay/we can't find a buyer for him in the summer. A play maker like Sancho does not necessarily utilize all the benefit of invert wide position: cutting inside to shoot.I personally think an RW is more important than a Striker
I get the feeling Martial will be gone if we are getting a Striker. This would leave us with only Rashford and Sancho as our established wingers at top level since Pellistri and Amad are still raw. I'd be OK with this if Rashford wasn't so bad now and has been for a long time, meaning we would basically have Sancho as our only reliable winger.While Sancho right now is doing well at left wing, he is comfortable to play on right wing at a high level. If we can get a natural forward, we have more freedom to utilize a goal scoring attacker on left wing, which is Rashford, or Martial if the new manager want him to stay/we can't find a buyer for him in the summer. A play maker like Sancho does not necessarily utilize all the benefit of invert wide position: cutting inside to shoot.
1. Patrik Schick
2. Darwin Nunez
3. Jonathan David
This is it for me. Martinez is far from convincing in the CL this season and doesn't really blow my socks off in Serie A either. From what I have seen at least. Price is also pegged at 80M? No chance.
Broja and Isak should be removed from consideration.
Schick has never scored more than 13 goals in a season until now?
Bayer 04 Leverkusen | 59 | 32 | 5 |
AS Roma | 58 | 8 | 3 |
UC Sampdoria | 35 | 13 | 4 |
Bohemians Prague 1905 | 29 | 8 | 1 |
RB Leipzig | 28 | 10 | 3 |
AC Sparta Prague | 10 | 1 |
SL Benfica | 71 | 37 | 14 | |
UD Almería | 32 | 16 | 3 | |
CA Peñarol | 22 | 4 | 1 |
Flexible front 9 is only important when you have got all your forwards scoring and sharing the goals burden like in a Liverpool or Mancity system. Our forwards are not capable of that. We don’t need a rigid no. 9 or a target man but we do need a seasoned striker. Rafael leao is a winger who primarily operates on the left so not only we would have one more player who plays on the left but also we would be ignoring the right side and the striker position once more. Besides I would choose nkunku over leao if we are talking about flexible forwards. But ideally we should get raphina for right wing slot and a striker on top of that.That's sort of the point. We don't need an old fashioned number 9 anymore. Flexible front lines are important.
He reminds of a bigger Martial that works a lot harder.
Also lets be honest, what other options are there that will be a fair price? we could do worse than Leao
That's mainly due to Zlatan or Giroud right now though.Flexible front 9 is only important when you have got all your forwards scoring and sharing the goals burden like in a Liverpool or Mancity system. Our forwards are not capable of that. We don’t need a rigid no. 9 or a target man but we do need a seasoned striker. Rafael leao is a winger who primarily operates on the left so not only we would have one more player who plays on the left but also we would be ignoring the right side and the striker position once more. Besides I would choose nkunku over leao if we are talking about flexible forwards. But ideally we should get raphina for right wing slot and a striker on top of that.
We're likely losing Cavani, Martial and potentially Ronaldo in the summer so it makes plenty of sense.Makes no sense to hire a striker when we have several players for that position.
Makes no sense to hire a striker when we have several players for that position.
Who?
Ronaldo is 37
Cavani gone in the summer
Rashford is terrible and arguably not a 9
Martial likely also gone in the summer
Greenwood likely gone for good
Unless you mean youth players who aren't ready yet, we absolutely need to sign a striker this summer
We're likely losing Cavani, Martial and potentially Ronaldo in the summer so it makes plenty of sense.
We're already light as it is with the Greenwood situation so one bad injury would screw us up top.
Smart man, he'd be cheaper than a lot of the more hyped options being mentioned and is just as, in some cases more, productive than most of the non-Haaland/Vlahovic names.Howson is all in for Jonathan David.
Representatives of Darwin Núñez are set to meet with clubs in Europe next month, to formalize interest in the player for the upcoming summer.
Howson is all in for Jonathan David.
Is he saying that there's interest or that it's his opinion we should be in for him?
Flexible front 9
He is saying we should be in for him.
David has a very high floor as a signing. No issues on or off the field. Worst case scenario outside of an injury is that he doesn't develop a ton and is a decent 15 goal striker who's not quite good enough to be our main man as the #9, but he drops deep well and works hard and presses so can be our more false 9 type option competing/rotating with a big fast #9 type.
Just turned 22, so if we sign him for 50M this summer we can probably sell him on in 3/4 years for the same amount at 25/26.
And he'd fit like a glove if we do hire a Rangnick recommended, Red Bull style manager and try to become a 4-2-2-2 team with Sancho and Bruno in behind David and another striker. He's formed a good partnership with Yilkmaz, who is as old as Cristiano, too.
Harry Kane?
100m will do.
He is only 28, and he was top scorer/top assist in PL last season.
Not serious, but just being realistic - England captain, PL proven, still at good age.not serious right?
Not serious, but just being realistic - England captain, PL proven, still at good age.
He is no.1 best striker in PL over past 5 years, lets be respectful.
While that's true he isn't the best striker this season and likely won't be for the next five seasons. And that should be enough to not buy him, would be a waste of money.Not serious, but just being realistic - England captain, PL proven, still at good age.
He is no.1 best striker in PL over past 5 years, lets be respectful.
Not serious, but just being realistic - England captain, PL proven, still at good age.
He is no.1 best striker in PL over past 5 years, lets be respectful.
To add to your list of objections -- a "good age"? Really? It would be mad to spend that much on what will be a 29 year old next season. He is just going to get less mobile and less athletic.And what, we spend most of our budget on 1 player and again leave other areas of need neglected? We need to get over this mindset, we need multiple players in multiple positions, meaning we cannot afford to spend like 100mill on one player, just cannot happen and shouldn't happen, even if he is world class, even though we'd be better spending 100m on Haaland