A man for 2 years in one position is not really bad, if the players in other position are long term replacements. We always don't get a player we want who is young and will stay on for long.We replaced Carrick with a bloke who would need upgrading within 2yrs. That is indicative of how short-term our planning is at United, our transfer policy is so poorly thought out. Everyone, jose included, knew Matic's legs were going and he wasn't going to be a long-term investment. £40m we spent on a man who performed well for half a season and now looks completely spent.
Yes please.
And until then, I like McTominay for it. I think he’s confident and able to learn. Those type of players are very valuable.
The lad you posted is the type of player who makes sure the other team doesn’t score and makes everyone better. I speak because it’s the role I play when I play CB
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is an example of how low we are setting our standards nowadays. Scott McTominay in the role made famous by Carrick. Scott can barely pass a ball, mate.
I don't think there's such a thing as a marketable holding midfielder, it's not really a glamour posiiton.Tough one really. Who out there is marketable and will shift sufficient number of shirts to satisfy the man who reigns over the transfer kity?
I see people saying Neves, but how marketable is he?
Neves. Snatch him before City
I has mentioned this in one of the other threads - Matic got dropped a lot in second half of Chelsea's winning season. Admittedly Baka turned out to be a horrible replacement.
Surely there is a Rakitic type player out there for Man Utd
Good talent but is he worth the hype?
Fred is a strange one. He's looked raw but talented. But he also cost 50 bloody million so there are certain expectations. On one hand, I don't know why we didn't sign a metronomic midfielder whose control and passing can always be relied on, instead of so many all rounders, and on the other hand, I don't think Fred has been that bad really to be given the Lindelof/Mkhitarian treatment.
Do you think Ndombele is really a holder though? I'm a big fan of his an he is good defensively, but I feel he's more of a box to box as he can contribute at both ends.Rodrigo should have been the one. With him and Kovacic out of the picture, the options look a bit less convincing currently. Truthfully I'd rather see us spend money on NDombele and extend Herrera's contract for now. Maybe use Fred there as well.
As far as less known players go, Marc Roca from Espanyol and Sangare from Toulouse could be interesting, but they'd also be a lot more risky and we need players that might be a bit further ahead in their development. As much as I would like us to sign Neves, he's going to be very expensive and I wonder with everything we still need, if our money is better spend elsewhere.
Tthe value in the market options could be Danilo Pereira and Brozovic, but I don't think they'll get us where we want to be. I haven't seen enough of Danilo Pereira recently.
Edit: And Kondogbia, had a really good season last year.
Do you think Ndombele is really a holder though? I'm a big fan of his an he is good defensively, but I feel he's more of a box to box as he can contribute at both ends.
Kondogbia is an interesting shout as a more mobile like for like replacement for Matic.
Gotcha, I really rate Ndombele but I wouldn't go another season with Matic starting as our main #6 as I don't see Herrera being here next season and I am not convinced Fred has the discipline to play that kind of holding role. I do agree that the diamond is the formation we should be looking at making our main one going forward given the players we have.What I suggested was basically in line with what you said, use Matic, Herrera and Fred as the #6 and NDombele as the #8. If I remember it correctly I've seen him play deeper for Lyon in 4-2-3-1, but that was just once or twice, and he did well. As you know Lyon mostly play with a 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 with a diamond and that's what I think we should use as well. Basically, I'd rather see us sign NDombele first and replace Matic later. I don't think we'd be able to do both, since we probably need a #10, a right winger and at least one CB. Neves and NDombele would obviously be ideal.
Gotcha, I really rate Ndombele but I wouldn't go another season with Matic starting as our main #6 as I don't see Herrera being here next season and I am not convinced Fred has the discipline to play that kind of holding role. I do agree that the diamond is the formation we should be looking at making our main one going forward given the players we have.
While he probably is better than our other options at those aspects, saying that he's incredible is a massive over-rating. Carrick was miles better than him in those aspects. Matic regularly gets caught out of position, gets dribbled straight past or is easily played around. Compare that to Carrick who had a natural ability to position himself so as to make the opposition have to slow down and ultimately pass the ball sideways or backwards. Not to mention his passing and vision far surpassed Matic.Herrera, Pereira and Fred (from what we’ve seen so far) are nowhere near good enough to replace Matic. I’m assuming most of you watch the games we play, so I’ve no idea how you’ve come to the conclusion we’d be better off with them. Matic’s anticipation, awareness and defensive positioning are incredible. He’s off form so far playing his way back in from surgery but he’s much better on the ball than he’s given credit for.
Fred definitely has the discipline to play as a holding midfielder. He played there plenty of times for Shakhtar and Guardiola wanted him to take over from Fernandinho.
Matic is in Valencia territory IMO, one game a week, which is why he shouldn't be a starting fixture. As far as Herrera and Fred go, I'm pretty sure Ander's contract is up at the end of this season and there doesn't seem to be any sign of a new one, he could possibly even go for a small fee in January I think. I know the poster above said Fred can play as a holder but when I saw him for Shaktar it was a double pivot in midfield and he was the more offensive of the two, but perhaps he can be coached into being the solo holder, worth a try at least.I am hoping you are wrong on that one. And I agree that Matic probably shouldn't (and can't) play as many games as he has in recent years.
Neves could certainly be our Jorginho but do keep in mind that right now he's playing next to a player who is making more tackles than he does in Moutinho.
Not that we couldn't do the same thing by playing Ander with him. But just to mention that at Wolves he gets a lot of help defensively from his partner. Far more than the midfielders we've been picking this season would help him
You do realise his partner is Moutinho, whos hardly the defensive type player.
We replaced Carrick with a bloke who would need upgrading within 2yrs. That is indicative of how short-term our planning is at United, our transfer policy is so poorly thought out. Everyone, jose included, knew Matic's legs were going and he wasn't going to be a long-term investment. £40m we spent on a man who performed well for half a season and now looks completely spent.
I agree, I'm not making a direct comparison obviously, but I'd love to see Pogba and Pereira play as #8's ahead of a holder, like Kroos and Modric at Real.Still prefer Andreas further forward personally. Don’t want to see him sitting in front of the defence, he has much more to offer going the other way. He can play alongside Pogba in front of whoever, as he’s more aggressive and can press.
Tough one really. Who out there is marketable and will shift sufficient number of shirts to satisfy the man who reigns over the transfer kity?
I see people saying Neves, but how marketable is he?