You're taking the piss now.
Since you have so much free time feel free to read over my posts on Van Gaal before the new year. You won't mind find much because I was reasonably satisfied with the job he was doing and signs of improvement were there. Go on..
We've been horse crap since the first half against Spurs and no amount of dressing up changes that.
And no, incorrect again. I've always said LVG should be given more time if we finish top 4. I've also said I'd be happy to give him more time even if we didn't finish top 4 as long as our football improved.
People defending some of our performances in 2015 should watch the Spurs game to know what good football actually looks like. Grinding out results is one thing and something I have no issues with it. That's not what we were doing. We were basically relying on our goalkeeper and loads of luck besides to keep us in games. I'm sure I don't need to inform a tactical expert like you on what a shit strategy that is.
You should stop taking things personally. I'm not disrespecting Van Gaal. Calling him shite when he goes out of his way to play players out of position and then blame the balance of the squad sounds fair enough to me. I have absolutely no opinion on LVG's managerial ability. I'm judging him on what I see at United and he's been all over the place this year.
Oh and Mourinho is a better manager (nice strawman about Mourinho being a god). I'll gladly swap LVG for him in the summer if it were possible.
'Loads of Luck', that's the typical response when you don't want to give the manager credit, like Napoleon Bonaparte said, 'great men become great because they have been able to master luck, what the vulgar call luck is a characteristic of genius', Louis van Gaal is known as a lucky coach, in the past few days I read about his luck in staying at Bayern with that Juventus win and turning things around and also his luck against SAF in the champions league semi-final and his luck in the world cup by scoring that goal just before half time against Spain (he was going to change to 4-3-3 at half time).
For him it's important to be totally reliant on yourself and not on coincidence, as an example many said he was lucky against Burnley but he said he was very happy we scored from two set plays because the team had a plan before the game for set plays, practiced it and now successfully executed it in the match, he touched upon this in two separate interviews and it is no surprise to learn prior to that match Burnley had conceded more goals from set plays than any other team in the league.
Being attentive to opposition vulnerabilities isn't really luck. Furthermore prior to that Swansea game his side had the second best chance conversion in the premier league only very slightly behind Chelsea (I haven't read statistics since), perhaps once more this is the consequence of his ever present desire to target opposition weaknesses.
I have not taken anything personally, not sure what makes you think that, this is a website where posters can reply to posts by others, it's kind of the point of a forum...
Also your last line contradicts the one about being happy to give him more time if he finishes top four, it appears if Mourinho were available but the board opted instead to give the current manager more time after finishing top four you would actually be unhappy.
But anyway continue to call him lucky, you will be doing it for years to come, all managers have things that go against them and things that go for them, the constant injuries have been a thorn in his backside but he has coped well, limiting the negative consequences on the results, having De Gea has been helpful and he has capitalised on great saves to make sure the team go down the other end and get the points, just like Pellegrini has benefited from Aguero winning him matches, Mourinho from Costa
and Courtouis, Wenger from Sanchez, Liverpool from Sterling, so what that he has
one player that can compete with those mentioned as player of the season?