AltiUn
likes playing with swords after fantasies
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
- Messages
- 24,388
The feck is this McTominay / Maguire propaganda on Sky?
Counterpoint: Sheffield controlled long parts of the game in the first half. Some nice saves from Obama saved us. Start of 2nd half we looked poor again. Garnacho and Eriksen on turned the tide.Not sure why people are saying "dreadful", "abysmal", "horrible" and other such nonsense. Have words lost all meaning? If this is dreadful what would losing 4-0 be?
Our attacking pattern is still... a bit chaotic to be called pattern, but otherwise today was a very improved performance. We scored 2 goals, had 3 big chances (Hojlund x 2 and Garnacho) and we hit the bar twice. We should have scored 3 or 4 if anything. We were unlucky. Oh and we defended much better than we have done so far this season.
I missed the game but one for the fellow xg merchants.
Either Maguire or Evans should be MOTM
I didn't watch the second half so I'll have to take your word for it. I thought Sheffield United were comfortably better than us in the first half.
The feck is this McTominay / Maguire propaganda on Sky?
He was MotM because Sky are clearly pushing that agenda.One scored a goal and spoke very well about Sir Bobby pre match, the other was MOTM.
Not hard to understand really
I missed the game but one for the fellow xg merchants.
I don't see how the xg could be that close. They had very few chances. We had so many outstanding chances.
Just off the top of my head:
- Bruno hit the cross-bar in the first half, keeper never moved
- Hojlund missed a tap-in by inches on a cross from Rashford (one of their players was pulling him back)
- Hojlund alone with their keeper after deflection from Rashford
- Amrabat hit the cross-bar with a shot
- Rashford intercepted back pass and instead of trying long shot into empty net passed it to Hojlund who took a weak long shot with Rashford wide open for return pass.
- Bruno played in Rashford alone on the left and he beat the goalie but was slightly wide right of the net.
- Garnacho's shot which just went inches wide left with the keeper standing looking
- Garnacho running the length of the field with the ball after one of their corners and having four United players busting a gut in support only to pass it to one of their defenders.
There are probably others I've forgotten. Perhaps Xg doesn't measure wasted chances or shots that miss the net but the game was nowhere near as close as those numbers suggest. We should easily have had four or five goals today.
Maguire was our best player by along way and the ratings at the top right of the page agreeOh come on. Maguire was decent, good second half, but spotty first. Evans had several bad defensive interventions, not a very good game at all. Dalot and Amrabat our best IMO.
I don't see how the xg could be that close. They had very few chances. We had so many outstanding chances.
Just off the top of my head:
- Bruno hit the cross-bar in the first half, keeper never moved
- Hojlund missed a tap-in by inches on a cross from Rashford (one of their players was pulling him back)
- Hojlund alone with their keeper after deflection from Rashford
- Amrabat hit the cross-bar with a shot
- Rashford intercepted back pass and instead of trying long shot into empty net passed it to Hojlund who took a weak long shot with Rashford wide open for return pass.
- Bruno played in Rashford alone on the left and he beat the goalie but was slightly wide right of the net.
- Garnacho's shot which just went inches wide left with the keeper standing looking
- Garnacho running the length of the field with the ball after one of their corners and having four United players busting a gut in support only to pass it to one of their defenders.
There are probably others I've forgotten. Perhaps Xg doesn't measure wasted chances or shots that miss the net but the game was nowhere near as close as those numbers suggest. We should easily have had four or five goals today.
Understat has it even tighter - 1.41-1.46. Once Fbref has the match report out, you can see the exact breakdown by each shot.
One thing to remember is that the xG doesn't take account of post-shot xG. So Dalot's goal and both of the crossbar shots will all be low-xG finishes.
Either Maguire or Evans should be MOTM
Interesting. We probably watched a different game.If we could finish, it would have been 4. Shite first half, better control second. Maguire and Evans were decent.
Started looking at Tik Tok before half time.
kinda says it all
apathy
Pen = xg 0.75I don't see how the xg could be that close. They had very few chances. We had so many outstanding chances.
He was MotM because Sky are clearly pushing that agenda.
One is average against relegation fodder and the other has less touches as a midfielder than our goalie.
So our two best players are McTominay and Maguire.
Evans quality also, should never have been sold.
Maguire was our best player by along way and the ratings at the top right of the page agree
I don’t think xG measures a chance like Hojlunds from Rashford’s ball across the box because he never made contact. Also, Dalot’s shot would generally have a poor xG because few shots go in from there.I don't see how the xg could be that close. They had very few chances. We had so many outstanding chances.
Just off the top of my head:
- Bruno hit the cross-bar in the first half, keeper never moved
- Hojlund missed a tap-in by inches on a cross from Rashford (one of their players was pulling him back)
- Hojlund alone with their keeper after deflection from Rashford
- Amrabat hit the cross-bar with a shot
- Rashford intercepted back pass and instead of trying long shot into empty net passed it to Hojlund who took a weak long shot with Rashford wide open for return pass.
- Bruno played in Rashford alone on the left and he beat the goalie but was slightly wide right of the net.
- Garnacho's shot which just went inches wide left with the keeper standing looking
- Garnacho running the length of the field with the ball after one of their corners and having four United players busting a gut in support only to pass it to one of their defenders.
There are probably others I've forgotten. Perhaps Xg doesn't measure wasted chances or shots that miss the net but the game was nowhere near as close as those numbers suggest. We should easily have had four or five goals today.
Surprised by how many people think we played terribly. It wasn't a vintage performance but at a weird kick off time with no recognised left back on the pitch and all of our back 4 and first choice defensive midfielder missing we... deservedly won a game of football?
I think because we started so slowly people's characterisation of the entire game gets skewed. United looked pretty disjointed and awkward for about the first 30 minutes - we were on the back foot and it felt a bit shit. But from the time they equalised we started to dominate possession and basically ground out half a dozen decent chances in the last two thirds of the match and one of them went in to put us ahead.
It wasn't spectacular football but it wasn't woeful either. We started slow, got better and given the circumstances I'm pretty happy with the win.
Michael Oliver