Sky1981
Fending off the urge
No I just wanted to know how many games you had played that's all, you obviously know the rest
Never played one minute of it
No I just wanted to know how many games you had played that's all, you obviously know the rest
Never played one minute of it
How many games of football have you ever played in competitive competition, just out of curiosity?
Never played one minute of it
Well I guess that's that then, you're completely right! My bad
More like wondering where the basis for the argument stemmed from. An understanding of the game as a participant or as a spectator. I dont see where Ive "responded to his argument by attacking the persons character". Is it against the rules to ask where someone gets their point of view?Ad Hominem:
attacking the person instead of attacking his argument. For example, "Von Daniken's books about ancient astronauts are worthless because he is a convicted forger and embezzler." (Which is true, but that's not why they're worthless.)
Honestly, you can't even give an indication as to why it was bad. It was Andy Carroll-esque. Okay, because it wasn't Maradonna-esque it was Andy Carroll-esque instead? That isn't even a quantifiable metric. If you, in your own words doubt you'd be able to find a performance where a footballer failed to find a team mate under 60% of the time, then you would by your own definition class something in that vicinity as a horrible performance. Due to the fact that it is so abhorrent you can't even fathom it? Because that makes more sense than the rest of your post.His performance was Andy Carroll-esque. I'm unaware of the percentages, but if the key indicators are an attacker 'failing to trap a ball' or 'failing to pass te ball to your teammates', there were several examples of this against Villa. I doubt many footballers ever, over 90mins, fail to find a teammate under 60% of the time. Especially in a team as pedestrian as ours. A simple pass backwards to a defender, unchallenged will probably give an attacker a decent average once done enough times.
One bad touch summed up an entire 90 minutes? Why? Because he mis-controlled a ball? Did the Morgan Schniederlin header at the back post that he could barely direct on goal sum up his performance? Again this is the same sort of thing, just saying Rooney was terrible and horrible without being able to really back it up. If one were to say it was poor or average, or not his best day then we wouldn't be having this conversation.Absolutely respect your opinion mate but I just can't agree with that. He was honestly terrible from start to finish. It was summed up when in the final seconds he went in on goal, took such a bad touch that all he had left to do was knock it out for a throw in so villa had 100yards to get to our goal. That was his only contribution to the game.
Yes, I understand he was below average in that Villa game. However, I think it would be absolutely bonkers to call time on his career at the moment. If he ends up bouncing back from this and going on a scoring run there will be few left standing with some credibility. Far to many have dug a huge hole for themselves, if history tells us anything it is that he will go on a run of scoring at some point in this season. I feel a lot of people have bet on snake eyes far to early in the piece. I'm still holding my money, I don't think I will be putting it down anywhere near him because I don't think he fits this system properly enough to score a lot of goals.I genuinely don't think I've seen him play worse for us. But I'm also not suggesting he's past it, he's done for or we need to sell him because that's nonsense.
He's always been a streaky player and usually that's fine. Trouble is he's now our main striker who you need to get goals even when they aren't playing well and that for me is the problem.
He will get goals and he will dig us out of a few holes this season... But he's not the player he once was and I think needs a bit of competition to make him realise he's not guaranteed to start.
I think what made his performance this week was that everything was just not right. His touch, especially. His movement although not static was not productive. He wasn't making the runs where he needed to. Even his energy levels looked down and that's meant to be a key attribute for him.
As Pogue correctly said, it's not uncommon at all for Rooney to have down matches where he's completely out of it. But it is rare when everything and I mean everything was wrong and there was no real shining moment where he showed his quality.
I don't think he's past it, 2 games in a season is way too early to make that claim. But as we saw with Terry yesterday, a player of his calibre and publicity will always draw rapid analysis which is potentially over the top.
Labelling it knee jerk is probably wrong. Plenty on this forum (I'm not one of them) have been saying he's been on the decline for a while. So for them, this is a confirmation of that theory. I won't judge him on two games as I didn't feel he was on the decline before and actually I backed him for at least 20 goals in one of the other threads but even I am starting to get worried. Worried not because I think he has lost his quality; I still think eventually albeit in spells he will find his rhythm and technique and what not, but because he genuinely looks like he doesn't know how to play that lone striker anymore. It's the fact he continually comes deep and even when he does its unproductive. Generally a pass backwards. He plays with his back to the opposition goal and whilst he can find his quality again, to change a mentality of playing like that and suddenly turning into the man who can run channels, make runs behind defences, and generally beat a man is very very difficult.
That's my greatest fear. He's a potent and productive striker and is very clinical despite what people on here will say. But I'm seriously questioning if he will ever get in the positions again regularly to utilise that ability. And in LVGs current system, that is precisely what we need.
So, tell me how you rated Gabby Agbonlahor's performance in this match?n you give me an example of a performance, by any footballer ever, that you consider to be a 'horrible performance'?
So, tell me how you rated Gabby Agbonlahor's performance in this match?
I personally think Rooney is the most underrated players in the world (at least on here)! He has bags of all round talent and yes maybe he has had patches or poorer form, but he is a class act and has been one of our best players consistently since he joined!
The notion of selling him has been a terrible idea for a long time.
The above being said, if we could get in someone like Muller I think Rooney would be a better 10 option, with Muller at 9!
But in absence of someone younger and in the top few players in the world it is hard to beat the class of Rooney.
One bad touch summed up an entire 90 minutes? Why? Because he mis-controlled a ball? Did the Morgan Schniederlin header at the back post that he could barely direct on goal sum up his performance? Again this is the same sort of thing, just saying Rooney was terrible and horrible without being able to really back it up. If one were to say it was poor or average, or not his best day then we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Yes, I understand he was below average in that Villa game. However, I think it would be absolutely bonkers to call time on his career at the moment. If he ends up bouncing back from this and going on a scoring run there will be few left standing with some credibility.
It was a pretty similar performance, however he only had 8 touches compared to Rooney's 36.I didn't notice him, naturally I didn't pay as much attention to the individual performances of players on the other team as I did with mine.
I saw enough to know that he wasn't particularly impressive though, but he did not stand out enough to the point where I thought it was particularly horrible.
Every touch?.. EVERY touch? Come on, you're destroying your own credibility here. This is just more revisionism to suit the narrative that Rooney is shite. People only claim to see the bad touches and make their argument from there.One bad touch? Every touch was bad mate. In fact you would be hard pressed to find a good touch from him in that game. So no 1 bad touch didn't make it a bad game, but all of his touches did. His passing was awful, his touch let him down all night and ultimately the game past him by. I can think of several times he got the ball and seconds later I groaned in disappointment.
It was a pretty similar performance, however he only had 8 touches compared to Rooney's 36.
Exponentially, the criticism is probably the same. A bad day at the office for either player. I am not really sure how you go about explaining that a player had a total of 8 touches in 90 minutes, compared to the supposed worst (most horrible, most terrible) player on the field who managed 36 touches only losing the ball twice and misplacing 8 passes. I think the facts lie somewhere in the middle. The fever pitch hyperbole being repeated ad nauseam by many does not help things.Well hopefully for him he has some fans on a Villa forum like yourself saying it was not so bad as he has seen a game with a person who had 7 touches.
However, I am sure that if it actually was on the level of Rooney's the criticism would be similar. Or not so, given he isn't a supposed superstar who is captain of his country and paid £300k a week. Who knows, that is their problem.
You cannot be feckin seriousSo, tell me how you rated Gabby Agbonlahor's performance in this match?
You cannot be feckin serious
One is paid 300k a week and is captain of Manchester United, one is Gabby bloody Agbonlahor.
Exponentially, the criticism is probably the same. A bad day at the office for either player. I am not really sure how you go about explaining that a player had a total of 8 touches in 90 minutes, compared to the supposed worst (most horrible, most terrible) player on the field who managed 36 touches only losing the ball twice and misplacing 8 passes. I think the facts lie somewhere in the middle. The fever pitch hyperbole being repeated ad nauseam by many does not help things.
The irony here is that you are now defending Agbonlahor for a similarly bad performance with one hand, while crucifying Rooney for similar things with the other. Also you've mentioned Andy Carroll again for a third time, I am still bemused on that front. I have no idea why you keep mentioning him as a form of performance metric.Forward players are generally called terrible for what they do with the ball, not without it. Andy Carroll is not a universally accepted symbol of shitness because he rarely gets the ball.
Exponentially, the criticism is probably the same. A bad day at the office for either player. I am not really sure how you go about explaining that a player had a total of 8 touches in 90 minutes, compared to the supposed worst (most horrible, most terrible) player on the field who managed 36 touches only losing the ball twice and misplacing 8 passes. I think the facts lie somewhere in the middle. The fever pitch hyperbole being repeated ad nauseam by many does not help things.
The irony here is that you are now defending Agbonlahor for a similarly bad performance with one hand, while crucifying Rooney for similar things with the other. Also you've mentioned Andy Carroll again for a third time, I am still bemused on that front. I have no idea why you keep mentioning him as a form of performance metric.
Anyways, we're done here.
He played the entire 90 minutes. Sanchez came on for Vertout and Sinclair (rather bizarrely I thought? He was causing us real problems before he came off) was brought off for Gestede. According to FourFourTwo anyway..United were utterly dominant for almost the entire game. The fact our striker saw much more of the ball than theirs (fairly sure Agbonlahor didn't last the full 90 either?) tells us nothing about the relative quality of their individual performances.
He'd probably have to play striker all season in a 4-3-3 where we regularly score a goal or more a game in which he no longer scores or assists. Continues on having 70-80% passing accuracy and getting consistently 30+ touches a game, shooting on target at sub 10% conversion rate. (Shots to SOT) (edit: But then do you say he's doing his job getting out of the way for others to score? At the moment he gets out of the way, Mata plays to deep and the left forward to far outside and then he drifts into Mata's space to pick up the scraps as far back as the half way line).Under what circumstances would you agree that Rooney is past it? What would you consider a good season for Rooney? I'm just curious about the conditions under which you would stop to defend Rooney here becuse you seem determined to defend his place in the team no matter what happens on the pitch.
I'm entitled to my own opinion and England are quite possibly the dullest team I've had the misfortune to watch.
He'd probably have to play striker all season in a 4-3-3 where we regularly score a goal or more a game in which he no longer scores or assists. Continues on having 70-80% passing accuracy and getting consistently 30+ touches a game, shooting on target at sub 10% conversion rate. (Shots to SOT) (edit: But then do you say he's doing his job getting out of the way for others to score? At the moment he gets out of the way, Mata plays to deep and the left forward to far outside and then he drifts into Mata's space to pick up the scraps as far back as the half way line).
I've always maintained that I stand by Van Gaal's decision to play him, purely because he is the most adaptable player and that position is where he himself wants to play. But this particular role is not the way you get him scoring a lot of goals and quite frankly, what this system has shown is that we won't be regularly scoring truckloads of goals. It seems more control the game and get at least 1 and then take a few more after that if it happens. Rather than a system where by you aim to go one, two or three up as fast as you can and then control and attack more and try and score a few with the individual instinctive freedom.
Basically we're like a turtle at the moment. Our shell is hard and protects us but our feet are still webbed and we're on land slithering around searching for food, if the system was built around Rooney's strengths then we'd be in the sea swimming freely and snapping up sea life and gorging ourselves. Our shell probably wouldn't be hard and protective, more aid is in swimming deftly and being able to garner more prey.
(my god what an awful analogy! haha)
It's just the comparison that staggered me, the performance of Agbonlahor is in no way related to Rooneys, mind blowing stuff.After a point, you have to agree to disagree sometimes. Anyone still so vehemently defending such a performance, a performance that even Rooney's biggest defenders on here have lambasted, it is unlikely you will be able to convince them otherwise.
He needs to get back to scoring goals fast. It's as simple as that. Goals can hide a multitude of sins and we won't be complaining about a few bum touches when he is getting on the scoresheet and we are winning games by more than the odd goal.
Which is where the lack of chances being created is an issue. Goals aside, that Mata through ball to Memphis was probably the one and only clear cut chance created for any attacking player in 180 minutes of football. Crap and all as he was against Villa, it's not as though he was missing chance after chance. He's a confidence player, who scores goals in bunches. It's just unfortunate that goals have been so incredibly hard to come by for us so far.
That is one part. The other part is also that he has been very poor once he had the ball and that he never was in a good position or made good runs. It's not a coincidence that the few chances we created didnt fall to Rooney except the Spurs own goalWhich is where the lack of chances being created is an issue. Goals aside, that Mata through ball to Memphis was probably the one and only clear cut chance created for any attacking player in 180 minutes of football. Crap and all as he was against Villa, it's not as though he was missing chance after chance. He's a confidence player, who scores goals in bunches. It's just unfortunate that goals have been so incredibly hard to come by for us so far.
That is one part. The other part is also that he has been very poor once he had the ball and that he never was in a good position or made good runs. It's not a coincidence that the few chances we created didnt fall to Rooney except the Spurs own goal
I didnt see those runs and as I said, you saw them rather from other players. His movement is not where it used to be and we can only hope it's "only" a form issueHe was shite against Villa (how many times do I have to say this?) but actually decent enough against Spurs. He's been making plenty of runs and his movement in and around the box has always been (and will always be) very good. His very last involvement was making a dreadful hash of that ball over the top from BFS. Nothing wrong with the run, just the execution when he got to the ball. Incisive passes like that have been incredibly rare in our couple of games so far though.
When was his laat world class performance? And how many has he had in the past 7 months? Arguably Arsenal FA and Spurs home, no more.Bit weird people are declaring him past it when he has always been capable of pub performances one week and world class performances another week.
The basis of his argument was contained in his post (whether or not I disagree with it personally is another matter) - that the bread and butter of a centre forward's role (i.e. trapping the ball, first touch, etc) shouldn't need to be relearned at this level of league and player experience - and you swept over that with a dumb question that basically amounted to 'Well, can you do better?' with absolutely no other set up. His point is neither strengthened or weakened by him personally playing in a 'competitive' league to make this point as he never referenced it.More like wondering where the basis for the argument stemmed from. An understanding of the game as a participant or as a spectator. I dont see where Ive "responded to his argument by attacking the persons character". Is it against the rules to ask where someone gets their point of view?