RedDevil@84
Full Member
Currently, he is too pre-occupied, to think about moving to UnitedBissouma operating in that line up could arguably make us favourites for the title, depending on the manager as well.
Currently, he is too pre-occupied, to think about moving to UnitedBissouma operating in that line up could arguably make us favourites for the title, depending on the manager as well.
He has 7 assists in the league this season already. People can’t ask Pogba to largely play a supportive role in a midfield double pivot and remove him from all set pieces to indulge Bruno and then lament him no longer outputting how he did previously.Flexibility is useless when it comes without productivity.
So what's his best position?Yeah, and that's a different argument. Like you said, the addition of Fernandes who seemingly can only play #10 with freedom makes it a separate debate.
But I don't buy the argument that Pogba doesn't have a position, or is difficult to incorporate. In fact, I think he's quite a flexible player who has competently played multiple positions for us, and as a result hasn't played in his ideal role as often as he'd like.
How many times have we seen Pogba in a 4-3-3 for United? I feel like I've seen very few games that we don't have a 2 deeper in midfield so I'm not sure this evidence is particularly robust. I think we could probably take a small sample of games in any position he's played for United and come up with a handful of good ones within that and offer it as proof. He has that type ability that he's capable of good games from anywhere but it's still far removed from nailing something down for him.Because it's worked most of the time we've seen it. Not every single time of course, but the percentages are in favour of that role.
This is a good example because Rashford, while clearly the same player, generally played better from the left than when he was tried up top. The difference was simply that he has played more often in his preferred position and role.
Currently, he is too pre-occupied, to think about moving to United
This. It’s a complete case of double standards how Bruno and Pogba are judged and referred to. How anyone can review our last two years and state that Pogba is the one that is difficult to incorporate or is inflexible is baffling.Yeah, and that's a different argument. Like you said, the addition of Fernandes who seemingly can only play #10 with freedom makes it a separate debate.
But I don't buy the argument that Pogba doesn't have a position, or is difficult to incorporate. In fact, I think he's quite a flexible player who has competently played multiple positions for us, and as a result hasn't played in his ideal role as often as he'd like.
He’s one of our best players so yes of course.
Bissouma is totally wrong for that role.As others have stated, a 4-3-3 is a must:
CDM
Bruno Pogba
Sancho Ronnie Rashford
We all know the missing piece to this puzzle. Bissouma operating in that line up could arguably make us favourites for the title, depending on the manager as well.
If Pogba was good enough to be our main guy doing the offensive load, we wouldn't have bought in Bruno.He has 7 assists in the league this season already. People can’t ask Pogba to largely play a supportive role in a midfield double pivot and remove him from all set pieces to indulge Bruno and then lament him no longer outputting how he did previously.
He's one of our best players in the same way that Mr Woo is one of the world's best players.He’s one of our best players so yes of course.
How many times have we seen Pogba in a 4-3-3 for United?
How anyone can review our last two years and state that Pogba is the one that is difficult to incorporate or is inflexible is baffling.
From a football perspective, he's not worth it based on our current state. He creates a tactical nightmare that the two managers he has played under since his return have not managed to solve.
We play 4-2-3-1 under Ole and when we tried 4-3-3 it was horrendous. He cannot play in the base of the midfield in a 4-2-3-1 he lacks the discipline. At the same time we have a better #10 in Bruno and better LWs in Rashford and Sancho. We no longer have the same dependency on him as we used to and it seems we cannot play a system that will get the best out of both him and the team as a whole. If he renews he'll probably be our highest earner and you cannot leave that player on the bench, you have to shoehorn him into the starting XI even if you cannot figure out how to do it without unbalancing the team.
But from a commercial perspective I'm sure he's valuable to keep and we'll try desperately to renew him. And if we do, we'll be having the same discussions we've had the last 5 years for the next 5 too.
In what position is he one of the best exactly? Certainly not central midfield or on the left.
He simply isn't worth building a team around at the expense of Bruno. If people don't understand that by now they've not been watching very closely.
Get rid and sign a proper midfielder that doesn't need everyone else to cover for their weaknesses.
Not necessarily by changing the players themselves.
Walker, for example, was a traditional up-and-down-the-line full back for Spurs, and he was excellent at it. He adapted after joining City to fit into their defensive structure. And they didn't play a false 9 with that Fernandinho-Silva-De Bruyne three in the middle, Aguero was the striker pretty much permanently in those two 2017-19 seasons where they amassed 199 points. That was with Sterling and Sane either side of him, neither of whom were particularly renowned for their work rate. Neither was Mahrez, who spent most of his time at Leicester as their main outlet on the break.
I've said this before but I don't see any reason you couldn't get players like Sancho, Greenwood and Rashford to adapt to the kind of system City/Liverpool play that demands intensive off-the-ball work. And the way City in particular use their full-backs is probably more suited for our starting pair than what we have them currently doing - Wan-Bissaka should be tucking in and using his incredible 1v1 ability to protect us on the break, not pushing all the way up to the byline.
This has been discussed to death, isn't it? Tell me how many occasions have we played a proper 3 man midfield with him? We haven't.That's nice, so what's his position?
Fact is Pogba has been more underwhelming than actually world class during his time with us and you can blame the tactics, managers and his teammates but at the end of the day he plays very sloppily and if he's not scoring/assisting, he's a complete liability.
Interesting, so we've played it but ages ago. I was thinking about Ole's reign which is probably why those setups and personnel were not springing to mind.Two spells under Mourinho (partnered by Carrick and Herrera, then Matic and Herrera) and one under Solskjaer (with Matic and Herrera) in his interim spell. And it was largely successful: people have posted our stats with that Matic-Herrera-Pogba midfield three before and it was very impressive, definitely a way higher win ratio than we've had overall for a few seasons now.
Well, no, because Fernandes has been generating more than enough output to justify his apparent inflexibility. If you make the argument that both of them need different formations to get the best out of them, then it becomes a question of who's more central to our attack to justify being accommodated. And that's pretty obvious right now. Fernandes was our top scorer and creator last season while Pogba spent half his time playing wide (and producing very, very little output)
If we were playing 4-3-3 with Pogba in his favourite role and he was carrying the attack putting up boatloads of goals and assists, everyone would agree Fernandes was the one that needed to find a way to fit into the team.
(This is all ignoring the question of whether it is in fact possible to accommodate both of them with a better tactical structure. Different argument)
Square peg round hole?It amazes me that we have a World Cup winning midfielder in our team yet we think he should leave the club . What's even more farcical is midfield is our weak point.How the feck does that work .
He has 7 assists in the league this season already. People can’t ask Pogba to largely play a supportive role in a midfield double pivot and remove him from all set pieces to indulge Bruno and then lament him no longer outputting how he did previously.
Aguero changed his game after Pep arrived, he wasn't the penalty box striker that he was at first. Of Sterling, Mahrez and Sane, only Sane really played as a proper wide attacker in the way that our wide attackers do now. Its not about hard work per se (though you need some of course) its about the number of options for a pass when you're on the ball, or a press when you lose it. City always make sure there's a pass on for their players by using one or more ways of getting the extra player in there. They don't always have a false 9 plus fullbacks coming inside plus 2 inverted wingers, but they usually have at least one of those options, often more than one. Not to mention the fact that De Bruyne and Silva were both more considerate with the ball and patient in the build up than Pogba and Bruno.
In our case, Rashford & Greenwood both naturally stay outside the width of the penalty area in the build up. Ronaldo isn't really linking up play these days. So who are Pogba and Bruno playing off in order to retain and work the ball in attacking areas? Each other and..? That was our problem vs Villareal. With Pogba and Bruno pushing high up, Sancho & Greenwood out wide and Ronaldo up in the box, all our attacking options are risky passes or dribbles, and as soon as we lose possession, we're a single pass away from a 2v1 against our DM with no pressure on the ball. AWB in the middle would help, but that makes our wide right attacker a bit redundant. Fine if they come inside to find the ball, not much good if they like to play in space out wide, as our options do.
Quite possibly, I'd love to see us press high, that would make it easier to play with a lot of numbers up front, but we're miles away from that at the moment. The workrate of our attackers is patchy and a Bruno/Pogba midfield won't outwork many teams either. A different manager might improve things through training or formation changes, but our squad hasn't been assembled with that approach in mind, so I don't see it as a natural progression. Much to our loss.
Is that now a problem ?4 of them were in one game!
This entire forum was waxing lyrical about him after his start to the season, entire team has a rough spell and he’s back on the scrap heap.
Of course we should keep him, our midfield is crap, he’s the only one who can get a feckin assist between them all.
I’d get rid of the entire midfield except Pogba and use the money to buy one single, decent, DM.
We are going nowhere with McFred and Matic is semi-retired, legs have gone.