I am as anti-Glazer as the next person but in the same situation, I would have handled the Lukaku transfer exactly the same way. If Dybala had been keen to join, we would have got a replacement I believe most fans would have been happy with. Since Dybala clearly was only willing to join for the wrong reasons, we took the cash on offer from Inter. Obviously we haven't re-invested the money as yet because the window shut that same day. Since Lukaku did not appear to be part of Ole's plans and had gone AWOL, I say better to have taken the money rather than have a sulky player sat ruining the mood until the window opened again.
So in summary, yes I agree that Pogba is a quality player but I do believe we WOULD re-invest the money. Call me naive but there has to be a balance between wanting the Glazers out but not being ridiculously critical of absolutely every decision they take (or do not take). I don't believe it would make sense for the Glazers to deliberately weaken their own asset when they are currently raking it in anyway. IF it was purely about making a quick buck, why not just sell half our squad in 2006?