Please ban DJS

Should DJS be banned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 12 26.7%
  • No, Ban everyone who starts "Immediate ban/promotion" threads

    Votes: 33 73.3%

  • Total voters
    45
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ban DJS....?

nah....I don't know the context of the 'bint' slur, but it's only text on a screen, ignore him if you must.

The worst that can be said of him is that he is annoying.....well maybe childish too. He just needs a smack now and then, not banning.
 
I don't think he should be banned, he has nothing nothing wrong........I think a public stoning would be more appropriate tbh ;)
 
To the moderators - I think DJS` participation in this thread is illustrating exactly what my complaint is. To the poster who reasonably pointed out that in yesterday`s posts there was nothing particularly bad - I am referring overall to his trolling policy.

I think it is clear if you go back over his posts since he started here, they fit the description of those of a TROLL who is out to cause as much disruption as he can.

Yesterday he may have addressed points in a thread that I didn`t look at again (I am not criticising that particular post) but for me and no doubt for some other Redcafe regulars, it is clear he has no interest in the give and take of argument.

As for his calling Gillespie worse or the same or whatever - I disagree. When Gillespie vehemently has disagreed with me (and usually with any other posters), he does so by throwing up insults, yes, but also replies to the points made by the Man United fans. Overall DJS simply engages in provoking, needling, ceaseless pointless `point making` and throws up `bint` where a reasonable reply was posted to him by me.

However, if it was the `bint` reference that motivated me to ask that he be banned, I would have requested at the time. That is not the problem in itself - redcafe should not turn itself into a sanitised version of what has gone on here for some time.

We all have the right to vent. But I question that a fan of another club has the right to hijack this forum with ceaseless posts aimed at having the last word, insulting where the previous post or posts were not abusive towards him, and just waste the time of those who enjoy fiery debate and discussion with others.

DJS is not a legitimate poster - he is a TROLL. That`s why he should be banned.
 
Or if not permanently, ban this TROLL until he can come back without hijacking threads and using this forum to antagonise, post obsessively, and take up space that could be used by some of the posters who seem to have disappeared from this site precisely because they want real discussion and debate.
 
DJS is a wonderful human being and he has an amazing hand eye coordination that enables him to use the keyboard and the monitor effectively but
.
.
.















He writes a single sentence, after leaving big hole (see above- in which you can easily insert a big article) he clicks a :lol: or a :wenger: smiley. It’s really ridiculous to allocate large objects or even space in the database to store the crap that DJS usually writes, even if we ignore the way he codes them

Consumption of bandwidth = DJS -wastage of (time+space) :)

Many corporate prefer cost cutting / resource utilization mechanism and redcafe must take the cue from them. So, the mods must ban DJS to set exemplary standards in bulletin board moderation. Either ban him or Marching should give him some books and teach him how to frame a sentence properly /..\///./….......So that he may learn how to type properly in an electronic document.

At times he also plagiarizes Redeus’s thoughts (a crime of highest magnitude by itself) and it becomes hard for us to differentiate between the two. :rolleyes:

Sign here if you agree


Thank and Regards
Vijay
 
giggsgirl said:
As for his calling Gillespie worse or the same or whatever - I disagree. When Gillespie vehemently has disagreed with me (and usually with any other posters), he does so by throwing up insults, yes, but also replies to the points made by the Man United fans.

he does? since when?

all he posts are wind-ups or some other shite.. when he isn't on a business trip that is
 
At times he also plagiarizes Redeus’s thoughts (a crime of highest magnitude by itself) and it becomes hard for us to differentiate between the two. :rolleyes:
You know, I've received my share of insults here but I don't think I've ever found anything quite so offensive as this statement. How can anyone possibly confuse me, ME, Redeus, with this scouse clown? Never has my good name been stained so severely...
 
Another point some people have missed - if you engage in insulting banter with another poster deliberately that is fine. I would not like to see this board sanitised.

However, there is a difference between two posters willingly and deliberately trading insults, calling each other colourful names and a situation where a trolling poster is continually attaching himself to posts made by another poster and insulting them. There is no give and take there, there is no shared understanding that both posters are venting.

That is what I mean by calling DJS a Troll. Check my posts and see whether I have ever called anybody a cnut, fecker, bint or whatever. You won`t find any. If I make a point, even in sarcasm, I expect a reply that is relevant. I don`t expect a Troll to start slagging without addressing the points made.

As for Davo - to use your own words, `sad feckers` post continuously on other football teams` forums and obsessively come back again and again to wind up the supporters of that football team. That is clear.
 
Davo said:
Yeah, ban moaners who ask for others to be banned

The sad feckers

too right, in fact ban idiots who ask for moaners who ask for others to be banned as well, and remember that indicaters are for all year round and not just for x-mas

its feckin sad
 
Obviously has the painters in or summat.

Hormonal woman should be banned.
 
giggsgirl said:
As for Davo - to use your own words, `sad feckers` post continuously on other football teams` forums and obsessively come back again and again to wind up the supporters of that football team. That is clear.

Blah blah 'kin blah

Do you ever shut up woman?

Get the feckin tea on...no one's interested
 
DJS said:
Giggsgirl appears to have lost the plot.

People like AEBM, Nate, Davo, Gillespie, Jobup etc are all equally, if not more 'abusive' than me....but those with a bit of sense see it for what it is...meaningless 'banter'...it's a bit like a pub in here....people call each other names and those who arent cry-babies get on with it. Does giggsgirl seriously think that i havent taken more than anyone's fair share of abuse?? I get it from mods for heaven's sake! But i dont go and cry about it, shouting 'ban' every five seconds. By giggsgirl's 'logic', there'd be about 4 posters left, if we banned everyone who had 'abused' someone else.

I called her a bint (might've been a clueless bint) once or maybe twice. I still stand by my thoughts that she doesnt understand the meaning of this, which might be why she overreacted to it so much. She threw her toys out of the pram.

Ironically, she wants me banned for name-calling, and in expressing this, she continually calls me a 'troll'....i assume, along with the meaning of 'bint', this irony will go straight over her head.

Furthermore, her outburst didnt come when i actually DID call her a bint, but instead, it came after i'd responded to one of her posts in a debating manner, without anything abusive or rude.

I personally think she has reached a point where she cannot answer my points, so has resorted to the 'ban him' cry. Bit sad really....oops, better be careful, she'll accuse me of 'beating her up' next :rolleyes:

Giggsgirl, if you cannot see that, generally speaking, i have no problem debating with people in a coherent manner and that i usually only get 'abusive' in retaliation to others who do it to me, then you're the one with a problem, not me.

As i've said, there are plenty of posters who are far more abusive than i am, and a lot of it is directed at me....yet, i dont go around 'crying to the teachers'... :rolleyes:

This isnt a nursery school....if you cant hack it, then you might want to reconsider being here.

That is all. :xmas-smil


Oi,DJS.......I'm not equally as bad as you........I'm ten times worse!! :xmas-bigg
 
giggsgirl said:
To the moderators - I think DJS` participation in this thread is illustrating exactly what my complaint is. To the poster who reasonably pointed out that in yesterday`s posts there was nothing particularly bad - I am referring overall to his trolling policy.

I think it is clear if you go back over his posts since he started here, they fit the description of those of a TROLL who is out to cause as much disruption as he can.

Yesterday he may have addressed points in a thread that I didn`t look at again (I am not criticising that particular post) but for me and no doubt for some other Redcafe regulars, it is clear he has no interest in the give and take of argument.

As for his calling Gillespie worse or the same or whatever - I disagree. When Gillespie vehemently has disagreed with me (and usually with any other posters), he does so by throwing up insults, yes, but also replies to the points made by the Man United fans. Overall DJS simply engages in provoking, needling, ceaseless pointless `point making` and throws up `bint` where a reasonable reply was posted to him by me.

However, if it was the `bint` reference that motivated me to ask that he be banned, I would have requested at the time. That is not the problem in itself - redcafe should not turn itself into a sanitised version of what has gone on here for some time.

We all have the right to vent. But I question that a fan of another club has the right to hijack this forum with ceaseless posts aimed at having the last word, insulting where the previous post or posts were not abusive towards him, and just waste the time of those who enjoy fiery debate and discussion with others.

DJS is not a legitimate poster - he is a TROLL. That`s why he should be banned.


Thanks Giggsgirl......you're a real sweetie.You'll be pleased to know that I have officially awarded you the title of Redcafe Blue Stocking for 2005 taking over from the previous encumbent (GiggsysGirl) whose recent form,like Phil Neville has been somewhat disappointing.
 
Personally I think DJS should stay he can be quite funny and adds a bit of humour to the board even if some of it is wind ups.
if anything on here is childish its starting threads about who picked on who and who should be banned. FFS grow up.
 
Your post gets the most misinformed post of the week. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

The problems I have been pointing out re DJS are to do with trolling - using an internet site to post excessively, waste space and people`s time, refuse to actually answer questions but jump in with abuse (childish, yes, I`ve been called worse than bint in my life but that is not why I think the obsessive Liverpool fan posting and tacking his endless, often refusing to answer the issue posts, should be banned). Actually I have been told to feck off on this site before, slagged off before. I never asked for those blokes to be banned - they were responding vehemently to points. They weren`t trolling for its own sake.

It is clear from what I have said in the brackets that this time wasting and unnecessary needling and jumping in for the sake of it rather than to contribute to discussion and debate, is why I have called for DJS to be banned. I stand by my posts stating why I don`t think Gillespie or other such posters can be compared with DJS.

He is in his own TROLL league. If you take the time to look at how he cuts into good debates and changes their nature or jumps in, slagging off for its own sake, into threads then maybe it will dawn on you that asking for posters to be banned who just screw everybody around and waste time and internet space is logical.
 
Sid.jpg


DJS is a sad bloke but purely evil.
 
giggsgirl said:
Your post gets the most misinformed post of the week. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

The problems I have been pointing out re DJS are to do with trolling - using an internet site to post excessively, waste space and people`s time, refuse to actually answer questions but jump in with abuse (childish, yes, I`ve been called worse than bint in my life but that is not why I think the obsessive Liverpool fan posting and tacking his endless, often refusing to answer the issue posts, should be banned). Actually I have been told to feck off on this site before, slagged off before. I never asked for those blokes to be banned - they were responding vehemently to points. They weren`t trolling for its own sake.

It is clear from what I have said in the brackets that this time wasting and unnecessary needling and jumping in for the sake of it rather than to contribute to discussion and debate, is why I have called for DJS to be banned. I stand by my posts stating why I don`t think Gillespie or other such posters can be compared with DJS.

He is in his own TROLL league. If you take the time to look at how he cuts into good debates and changes their nature or jumps in, slagging off for its own sake, into threads then maybe it will dawn on you that asking for posters to be banned who just screw everybody around and waste time and internet space is logical.

Kinell! Do you ever stop???

You go on about me doing this, that and the other....yet, you're the one who wont stop going on and on and on and on about it....why dont you get over it and possibly consider a hobby?

You've said your piece (82 times) and made your point. The constant whinging is quite frankly ceased to be remotely funny and i suspect i'm not the only one who you've bored to death.... :boring:

If you dont like me, here's an idea - there's an icon which says 'ignore this user'....use it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.