Please ban DJS

Should DJS be banned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 12 26.7%

  • No, Ban everyone who starts "Immediate ban/promotion" threads

    Votes: 33 73.3%
  • Total voters
    45
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,935
Location
where the sun rises
Hello - I have had a gutful of abusive, needling, negative,trolls who support other teams coming on to this forum to waste posters` time. Please read my reply to DJS posted just then - his post above mine may seem harmless but if you take the time to read his posts even over the past month or so you will see my point.

Most posters who get into an argument with another poster can hold off when a reasonable reply is posted to them. Or can keep engaging in banter that may seem rude but is harmless. DJS fits into neither category.

His posts today are by no means reflective of the trolling he does daily on these boards but today is really the last straw. Have a look at his posts - go back for a 3 month period up to now. He is a trolling, waster of everybody`s time here.

He is an abusive, nasty troll with a complusive-obsessive disorder and this site does not need his ilk. I am going to keep complaining about him until he is removed. Ban him now please.
 
giggsgirl said:
Hello - I have had a gutful of abusive, needling, negative,trolls who support other teams coming on to this forum to waste posters` time. Please read my reply to DJS posted just then - his post above mine may seem harmless but if you take the time to read his posts even over the past month or so you will see my point.

Most posters who get into an argument with another poster can hold off when a reasonable reply is posted to them. Or can keep engaging in banter that may seem rude but is harmless. DJS fits into neither category.

His posts today are by no means reflective of the trolling he does daily on these boards but today is really the last straw. Have a look at his posts - go back for a 3 month period up to now. He is a trolling, waster of everybody`s time here.

He is an abusive, nasty troll with a complusive-obsessive disorder and this site does not need his ilk. I am going to keep complaining about him until he is removed. Ban him now please.
Click to expand...


If this is genuine GG, then I agree. Ban the boring, scouse, WUM.
 
Ban his Briches.
It'd do him good and leave him some time over for his other intrests in life, like buying Cd roms etc.
 
Giggsgirl appears to have lost the plot.

People like AEBM, Nate, Davo, Gillespie, Jobup etc are all equally, if not more 'abusive' than me....but those with a bit of sense see it for what it is...meaningless 'banter'...it's a bit like a pub in here....people call each other names and those who arent cry-babies get on with it. Does giggsgirl seriously think that i havent taken more than anyone's fair share of abuse?? I get it from mods for heaven's sake! But i dont go and cry about it, shouting 'ban' every five seconds. By giggsgirl's 'logic', there'd be about 4 posters left, if we banned everyone who had 'abused' someone else.

I called her a bint (might've been a clueless bint) once or maybe twice. I still stand by my thoughts that she doesnt understand the meaning of this, which might be why she overreacted to it so much. She threw her toys out of the pram.

Ironically, she wants me banned for name-calling, and in expressing this, she continually calls me a 'troll'....i assume, along with the meaning of 'bint', this irony will go straight over her head.

Furthermore, her outburst didnt come when i actually DID call her a bint, but instead, it came after i'd responded to one of her posts in a debating manner, without anything abusive or rude.

I personally think she has reached a point where she cannot answer my points, so has resorted to the 'ban him' cry. Bit sad really....oops, better be careful, she'll accuse me of 'beating her up' next :rolleyes:

Giggsgirl, if you cannot see that, generally speaking, i have no problem debating with people in a coherent manner and that i usually only get 'abusive' in retaliation to others who do it to me, then you're the one with a problem, not me.

As i've said, there are plenty of posters who are far more abusive than i am, and a lot of it is directed at me....yet, i dont go around 'crying to the teachers'... :rolleyes:

This isnt a nursery school....if you cant hack it, then you might want to reconsider being here.

That is all. :xmas-smil
 
He may be a scouser, and may be delusional and possibly Obsessive Compulsive and even annoying by some standards but I can see nothing in yesterdays posts that would suggest a banning is in order...

maybe if he tries to hit someone over the head with a smilie a banning would be in order, but I don't think anything out of turn went on yesterday, certainly not by the normal standards of the board. Not anything that would merit a banning anyway.
 
FLASHWOK said:
He may be a scouser, and may be delusional and possibly Obsessive Compulsive and even annoying by some standards but I can see nothing in yesterdays posts that would suggest a banning is in order...

maybe if he tries to hit someone over the head with a smilie a banning would be in order, but I don't think anything out of turn went on yesterday, certainly not by the normal standards of the board. Not anything that would merit a banning anyway.
Click to expand...


In all honesty I dont care if he is banned or not. The thing is a lot of his posts are WUM material. He is a liverpool 'fan' and gets away with WU's on a United forum. I-8 kopites (for instance) gets banned for 'winding up' fellow United fans on a United forum....how does that work?
 
GroundSide said:
In all honesty I dont care if he is banned or not. The thing is a lot of his posts are WUM material. He is a liverpool 'fan' and gets away with WU's on a United forum. I-8 kopites (for instance) gets banned for 'winding up' fellow United fans on a United forum....how does that work?
Click to expand...

If that's the standard, then you may as well ban ALL opposition fans.

That'd be a fun forum, wouldnt it?
 
GroundSide said:
In all honesty I dont care if he is banned or not. The thing is a lot of his posts are WUM material. He is a liverpool 'fan' and gets away with WU's on a United forum. I-8 kopites (for instance) gets banned for 'winding up' fellow United fans on a United forum....how does that work?
Click to expand...

I-8 kopites was a twat right off the bat...from DJS at least it's to be expected that he will attempt to WU since he's a pool fan, with kopites it was because he spent all his time accusing others of not being fans in a way that became tiresome vey rapidly...

An insult from DJS isn't a big deal to me but when a sanctimonius person tells everyone that they are not a true United fan if they don't know the exact date of the last transferred player between LFC and MUFC it gets a bit tiresome...besides, DJS is a favored punching bag for many around here and he provides very valuable target practice to veteran posters.
 
GroundSide said:
No, I dont mind having oppo fans on the Forum...but oppo fans who have 'come on glazer' on there log-ins are not here to talk footy, just on a blatant WU.
Click to expand...

Dont be such a drama queen!

If my location being 'come on glazer' winds you up so much, you need to get out more. It's words on a screen, it's hardly going to get Glazer in is it?

I've said it before and i'll say it again...there are far worse 'WU's than me on here.
 
DJS said:
Dont be such a drama queen!

If my location being 'come on glazer' winds you up so much, you need to get out more. It's words on a screen, it's hardly going to get Glazer in is it?

I've said it before and i'll say it again...there are far worse 'WU's than me on here.
Click to expand...


No im not a drama queen. The Glazer thing is a Cnuts trick.

I should get out more? Mr 80,000 posts on a United forum...
 
DJS said:
If that's the standard, then you may as well ban ALL opposition fans.
That'd be a fun forum, wouldnt it?
Click to expand...

It was done before, all the wums like yourself were removed and the forum was a better place for it. Im all for ethnic cleansning.

You like to think of yourself as the "reasonable scouser", "knowledgeable", "dignified" and of course "classy".
Ive never seen you discuss shite without having to put one of your infamous winks at the end of it. Discuss something with you and you end up going around in circles for months, yrs as is the case of marching.
Of course when things go bad you have to pop out "to buy Cd Roms".
 
Let him be. Admittedly some of his posts are 'twat'-ish and has been recognised as such by the mods, but on the whole, he DOES add to the entertainment value of this place. This is after all the cyber-world. For all we know he could be a decent chap in reality, who shares the same passion for women, whiskey and fine cigars( or this could all be wishful thinking on my part ).

Giggsgirl, my apologies if my post appears to belittle your feelings. I assure you that is not the case. However I don't think banning someone is the answer here. If you don't like his posts, then just tear into him with all you've got, or you could just ignore him. I think quite a lot of us here prefer the latter!
 
Murt said:
It was done before, all the wums like yourself were removed and the forum was a better place for it. Im all for ethnic cleansning.

You like to think of yourself as the "reasonable scouser", "knowledgeable", "dignified" and of course "classy".
Ive never seen you discuss shite without having to put one of your infamous winks at the end of it. Discuss something with you and you end up going around in circles for months, yrs as is the case of marching.
Of course when things go bad you have to pop out "to buy Cd Roms".
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that you, of all people, can complain about others.

And they werent CD Roms.....but nevertheless....
 
thewelshconjurer said:
As long as they are Manchester United supporters they may post on this forum. Otherwise I can't see any point in them being here.
Click to expand...

You may not see the point, that's your perogative.

But i dont see any reason why you'd want to change the entire 'remit' of this site, which has been there since it started.
 
The mods will decide for themselves i'm sure, and if you are banned it will probably be temporary to serve as a warning
 
Gazza said:
The mods will decide for themselves i'm sure, and if you are banned it will probably be temporary to serve as a warning
Click to expand...

It's one particular mod i'm concerned about.

In any case, a warning for what? Calling someone a bint?

Far far worse is said by plenty of people. I dont go around calling United 'Man Yoo' or posting nonsense about Munich, etc.

Any 'winding up' i do is purely banter and i'm no more guilty than numerous other fans. As for 'abuse', you've only got to look at my 'status' to see that i receive far more than i dish out. I dont whinge about it.

Kin storm in a teacup, this...
 
Its not what you say necessarily syd but more how you can ruin threads by posting frivolous bollocks and ending it with a ;)

Speculating here but i dont think you will be banned on the strength of this poll, at least not permanently
 
Gazza said:
Its not what you say necessarily syd but more how you can ruin threads by posting frivolous bollocks and ending it with a ;)

Speculating here but i dont think you will be banned on the strength of this poll, at least not permanently
Click to expand...

If posting 'bollocks' is a problem, then there'd only be 10 posters left here.

And it's subjective i think. One man's 'bollocks' could be another man's logic. Being an LFC fan, i'm hardly going to agree with most of what United fans say.

I'm going to be banned for disagreeing with certain things posted by Man Utd fans....real bastion of fairness, that.

Fact remains that if Giggsgirl hadnt overreacted, no banning would be considered even. And she got her knickers in a twist because she was called a 'bint'...a word which i still dont think she got the meaning of. Hardly the most viscious of 'insults' used here, is it?

The place is turning into a nursery school. :wenger:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.