Jesus, I'm not for abusing players, but some posters are going over the top for defending Jones. Haven't seen the same for other players that have been abused in the last 7-8 years.
Why was Rooney not defended when our own fans were giving him dog abuse for every small little thing?
That's just absolutely not true in any way at all is it?
Fred gets criticized, people stick up for him.
McTominay gets criticized, people stick up for him.
Rooney, Berbatov, Lindelof, Wan Bissaka, Maguire, Pre last season Shaw, De Gea, all the same.
Some love to moan, some love to moan at the moaners. This is how the forum works...
With Phil Jones, a narrative has grown out of al proportion that he's a leech and '
stealing a living' is one of my favourites...
Here's what we know;
He's a talented footballer.
He's been plagued by injuries.
His form has flucuated over the years.
His contract was renewed.
He's now back in training after having knee surgery.
My take from this is, he's a talented player who's form has flucuated because he's been playing through pain and his knees had given up on him. When offering him a new contract the club who aren't a charity, offered him a lucrative contract because they thought he justified it (by whatever metrics they used). He's now getting back to fitness.
And here's the crux for me, I wish him the best for us and don't wish to deride his past performances.
Apparently for some, seemingly like yourself, that seems unreasonable...