He's had an unbelievable goal involvement record since the start I think. For an attacking midfielder, he already has 14 goals scored in his limited playing time. That's around 2350 minutes in the last 2 seasons from a quick glance.Since the league restarted he's got 4 goals in 3 games.
I think he was already close to this level but he got a frustratingly low amount of football.I would say he's being perfectly coaced. Alot of posters here are disagreeing though, but he has taken steps and is ready now.
Pep was done excatly right in my opinon.
For England's youth sides, he always played on the wing or sometimes in CM when Angel Gomes would be the #10. So he has a lot of experience playing in that kind of role.Seems like Pep now sees him exclusively as a WF, be it on the right or the left wing...
He has four goals and two assists since lockdown ended. I really hope he gets the opportunities he needs next season with David Silva leaving.
That's an understatement. Tell you what, England have some truly phenomenal talents coming through.He was fantastic against Liverpool. He ran Robertson ragged.
The biggest talents are Sancho, Greenwood, and Foden. The fourth option is a toss up. I would have put CHO along with them, but he had that achilles injury and hasn't been the same since then.Where will he play for England and alongside whom is the question.
I think he was already close to this level but he got a frustratingly low amount of football.
Saying that though maybe he protected him from the pressure and now he can explode. Looks the nuts though doesn't he?
What a shame he ended up a blue.
I've been really impressed whenever they play other youth sides. For example, they smashed Brazil and I think they tied Argentina, but largely had possession. They seem like the clear standout national side for their age group along with France (tbf I'm a little less knowledgeable on France apart from Mejbri, Cherki, and Da Silva). I'm really impressed with England's top talents. However, I don't think it's quite as deep as the 2000 generation. For example, I didn't name Smith Rowe, and Ian Poveda who were bench players. At the time when I first heard of Gomes, and Foden, I thought Kirby was highly regarded, but he fell off compared to his peers. Similarly Oakley Booth fell off.@In Rainbows what's your personal view on the 2003 generation? Like you said, they're very highly regarded but I'm not sure what to make of them at the minute, I don't think they're as good as the 2000 generation but I do think the 2001 generation will rival them for talent in the next few seasons.
@In Rainbows what's your personal view on the 2003 generation? Like you said, they're very highly regarded but I'm not sure what to make of them at the minute, I don't think they're as good as the 2000 generation but I do think the 2001 generation will rival them for talent in the next few seasons.
Any chance you have changed your stance since March?He is very overrated. I have watched several games of him and he is a tidy player for sure with good skills but not much more than that.
Anyone who has watched Foden play and thinks he is overrated is either a troll or knows nothing about football.Any chance you have changed your stance since March?
A very good post/summary. Quoted this part to say that if England can get 3/4/5 top talents from every age group, in a few years it will translate into massive depth for the senior side anyway.From what I can see, the 2003 generation has the top talents, but most likely doesn't have the same depth as 2000.
I consider the 2003 group to be far ahead than the 2000 group.A very good post/summary. Quoted this part to say that if England can get 3/4/5 top talents from every age group, in a few years it will translate into massive depth for the senior side anyway.
I haven't watched a single Man City match since March. I gave the impression I had at the time, not sure why it bothered some.Any chance you have changed your stance since March?