TheReligion
Abusive
Harry got robbed
Got Kane'd
Harry got robbed
Son played 37/38 league games..Son missed a third of the season too.
Went missing for a third of them though, didn’t he?Son played 37/38 league games..
One could argue Fernandes has went missing for a large selection considering he gets slated on here often for his performances and especially in big games.. Should he not be picked?Went missing for a third of them though, didn’t he?
Grealish missed 12 straight games with injury and then made cameo appearances in another two. It's hard to make it into team of the year when you miss a third of the season in one chunk.
Agreed, this season he was still great but not as good as before in my opinion - there was also that whole narrative about 'are City actually better without him' when Gundogan was on fire. Would have thought Tielemans could have been a nice shout for the 3rd CM spot.Possibly yes although it was just a purple patch.
KDB the greatest midfielder in the history of the world scored 6 goals in a title winning team, so overrated.
Agreed, this season he was still great but not as good as before in my opinion - there was also that whole narrative about 'are City actually better without him' when Gundogan was on fire. Would have thought Tielemans could have been a nice shout for the 3rd CM spot.
Well, there is KDB and Ederson for companySon doesn't deserve to be in this. He wasn't really that consistent and had a lot of shit games.
I would also take Grealish over Son any day.
Where is Foden?
You are only comparing league gamers and not showing the full picture here. For example, he only made 17 starts in PL, as compared to 36 starts from Son, 34 starts from Salah.Who would you take out for Foden (9G 5A)? Bruno (18G 12A), De Bruyne (6G 12A), Gundogan (13G 2A), Son (17G 10A) or Salah (22G 5A)?
He was only great in the CL knockout games.According to Chelsea fans Kante is the frontrunner for Ballon d‘or, weird that the best player of the year can‘t even make it in the TOS
Stones has 22KdB played 23-24 games out of 38 for City, so he's an odd one out and don't think he should be there everyone else has a valid case.
Stones has 22
It's the PFA Team of the Year for the Premier League, so of course they're only using league stats. Stats in other competitions have no relevance.You are only comparing league gamers and not showing the full picture here. For example, he only made 17 starts in PL, as compared to 36 starts from Son, 34 starts from Salah.
Besides, Foden has overall 16 goals and 9 assists this season (league and cups), which is not bad at all. I'd say Foden is one of the more important player for City winning the title.
It's the PFA Team of the Year (the PFA being the Professional Footballers Association, the players' union), voted for by the players themselves. The FA hasn't been involved.Spurs finished 12 points and 5 places behind us and still have the same number of players in the team as we do. FA might as well just issue a statement saying they hate us.
Mendy/Martinez for Ederson without much doubt.
Fofana had a better season than Stones IMO.
I'd take Grealish over Son at Manchester United, but we are talking about the team of the season. Not sure how you can pick a guy 6 goals and 10 assists over a guy who had 17 goals and 10 assists. Perhaps if Grealish didn't get injured it could be a different conversation, but because he was, the front 3 picks itself...
Not everything is about just goals and assists. Grealish was probably the best player in the league for the first two thirds of the season until he got injured. Son started the season brilliantly for the first month or two, but for the rest of the season he was very similar to Rashford for us - constant poor and frustrating performances somewhat hidden by managing to sneak a goal or assist and the occasional good match. Obviously managing to get those stats up even when playing poorly is a great attribute in it's own right (both for Son and Rashford), but there's no way he should be getting into the Team of the Year ahead of Grealish who was just ridiculously good.I'd take Grealish over Son at Manchester United, but we are talking about the team of the season. Not sure how you can pick a guy 6 goals and 10 assists over a guy who had 17 goals and 10 assists. Perhaps if Grealish didn't get injured it could be a different conversation, but because he was, the front 3 picks itself...
Maguire had comfortably been better than both and pretty much played double the games too.Surprised people think Stones is a controversial call, especially over Maguire. The CB who maybe should feel a bit hard done by is Rudiger.
Sorry but don’t agree with that at all. Stones, Dias, Rudiger, Silva have all been comfortably better in my opinion.Maguire had comfortably been better than both and pretty much played double the games too.
I mean it’s understandable, Maguire doesn’t get anywhere near the credit he deserves, especially amongst some Utd fans.Sorry but don’t agree with that at all. Stones, Dias, Rudiger, Silva have all been comfortably better in my opinion.
Or I mean maybe he is slightly overrated by United fans. He was no doubt decent over the season. But PFA have decided he wasn’t in the 11 and honestly bar the keeper and possibly KDB that looks about right to me.I mean it’s understandable, Maguire doesn’t get anywhere near the credit he deserves, especially amongst some Utd fans.